marie2
Posts: 1690
Joined: 11/4/2008 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
ORIGINAL: kittinSol quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
...Since slavery is illegal, and they're not arguing to make it so, let them have at it and describe their intimate rapport in whatever way they like... indeed, why must certain folks attempt to invalidate other's relationships with arguements like "slavery isn't legal", when they know full well there is more than one definition of the word, depending on context? ESPECIALLY on a message board that includes sections such as "Ask a Master"...and they aren't talking judo. Here's the crux of it, I think: questioning the semantics isn't invalidating the relationship. The relationship is personal. The words you use to describe it to the world can be questioned, on the other hand, by the world you present it to: and that's part of being on a public forum. if this public forum was match.com, or eharmony, or somewhere folks gather together to discuss conventional relationships, then this slave could possibly agree with you. but it isn't...and THAT'S the crux of it, for this slave. if those sites had sub-sections with the "Ask a Master" and "Ask a submissive/slave" headings, she could possibly understand the "but slavery isn't legal" ignorance that would no doubt waft through, along with the rest of the folks who are only comfortable when everyone is participating in conventional, socially acceptable pairings. but to wade into a BDSM message board, complete with sub-sections for posing questions to "Masters" and "slaves" and then proclaim that none of these folks are in "real" relationships because it's just not based on specific legal definitions of the terms...seems a bit ignorant, if not an outright attempt to invalidate or belittle another's choice of relationship dynamic. This wasn't directly addressed to me, but I'd like to jump in here with some input. I don't think anyone is attempting to invalidate anyone's relationship here. I just think we (generic) share different ideas and have different approaches. And the personal reasons (From either or any camp) are valid to each. I've oscillated at times, and evolved over the years and I've come to certain conclusions, based upon my own experiences and observations, that work for me, just as you (or whoever) has come to the conclusions and beliefs that work for you. What's wrong with sharing those different points of view? I actually like to hear both sides of it. Sometimes it opens up my mind to a point of view I hadn't considered. Other times it makes me more firm in my own beliefs. Either way, it's only a discussion. I don't understand why expressing opposing views as food for thought and adult discussion, is being interpreted as an attempt to "invalidate" your relationship. I don't think anyone here has said (or implied) that someone "shouldn't" use the terms, or that someone isn't real, or that someone's relationship is bullshit or a fantasy. We were asked whether or not we see wiitwd and mastery and slavery etc, as fantasy or reality, not whether or not we think mercnbeth's relationship is real or valid. I agree there are different interpretations of the terms we use. Heck, I use the terms too, when I'm in "Rome". But this is a topic about the application and reality of some of the terms that we use and what they mean to us each as individuals. What's wrong with discussing how we feel about this, and why we feel the way we do? We certainly can't discuss it on Eharmony. So where should it be discussed by those who want to discuss it? Or are you saying it shouldn't be discussed at all?
|