N4SDChastity -> RE: Bush's 'torture lawyers' facing arrest in Spain for war crimes? (4/16/2009 8:53:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy Marc, you appear to have missed my point. The US has prosecuted foreign nationals over events that have occured overseas but have affected US interests. So, the idea that country A has no right to prosecute citizens of country B is one that your own country doesn't share. So, why the outrage when instead of US courts trying a foreigner, a foreign court wants to try a US citizen? i am old enough to remember when a couple of US pilots in Italy, broke their own rules and ran into the lines holding up a cable car. People were killed. A clear case of US nationals breaking the law in a foreign country. Those airmen were airlifted out of Italy so fast their feet didn't touch. Why? Why couldn't Italy prosecute those people? The US prosecutes those foreigners who break US law on US territory...and rightly so. So how come the US is all for the rule of law unless it's someone elses courts? US courts do not have a monopoly on justice. (speeeeling edit) I am not only olde enough to remember this event, I was stationed at HQ EUCOM, at the time. The reason they were taken out of country so fast was because no one, not the Italian government, and certainly not the Americans, wanted rioting and the comcomant deaths that would certainly have occured had they remained in country. They were only in country for an exercise, anyway, not permanently assigned there. The reason they were not tried in Italian courts is because of the SOFA (Status Of Forces Agreement) in place that covers who has jurisdiction in situations such as this. Hint: The Americans did. They were tried in a Military Courts Martial. Not guilty of negligent homicide (or whatever the actual chatges were), guilty of conduct unbecomming. DD (dishonorable discharge... A federal conviction, by the way, as are ALL military courts martial. Don't know what happend to the piolt and navigator, but, I can guarantee you they do not hold a Federal, State, or Local government job.) No retirement, either, not with bad papers. Never work as a Gov't contractor, either. Nor will their spouses, or probably their kids, for that matter.
|
|
|
|