ownedgirlie
Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou Hmmm, I'm a little taken aback by some of the posts here. Okay granted the OP was naive, and admittedly inexperienced. The Domme knew that, and still neglected to teach him anyway of communicating without a safe word. My view is if your going to be a Dom, Domme, you are the one with a greater responsibility than the sub. Because you are making decisions for them. This Domme knew he had been abused by men, then had him gangbanged by two men? This Domme knew he didn't know what being collared meant, yet didn't teach him anything at all, and took him as slave. My view this Domme, if the OP is telling the full story, belongs in jail. Really call your local Police department, and see how well, the dommes arguments stand up. So, I guess some believe a domme, can just accept a new slave, and not make sure they understand what position they are taking, then take one of the most dramatic experiences in there past and inflict it upon them within a couple weeks. Gag them when the only thing that's been explained is a safe word. Oh on top of it, not even gone over the hard limits a person has might be. Yeah, that's a good domme . If this was a man doing this to a woman, he'd be in jail for rape. hmmm, okay. And someone brought up that just because a guy wants to fuck a guy, means he should be willing to be fucked. That is absurd, and completely off-base. So, if I like my balls kicked by guys, I should assume they'll want theres kicked as well. If I like to be choked during sex, that means my parnter must be choked? If a slave likes to lick a Dommes pussy, does that mean the Domme must suck his dick. No, is the answer to all those one sided non-sexually equal relationships. Wanting to fuck a guy, doesn't mean you want to be fucked. If that's the logic, well, all the dommes or doms on here, are due for a few years of pain and submission. Line up, no lube for you. In reading some of these posts, i was thinking along these lines. i can only speak from the experience i know, from my own Master. He has put me through some extreme situations but NEVER without being completely sure he had prepared me adequately for them. Even if something has been sprung on me by surprise....there had been enough prior explorations of my mind, thoughts, feelings that he was confident i would be able to handle it. What happened to the creed of not putting more on your submissive than he/she can handle (i'm not really sure there is such a creed; i made that up). Yes yes yes, one who claims to be slave to Master or Mistress has then consented to serve in any form Master or Mistress deems...but what Dominant collars a slave after just a few days?? And what Dominant would push a situation which has proven to be emotionally traumatic on one's past? These are the questions that come to me as i read. It seems rather irresponsible to me. If i may indulge (since i am on a roll now)....for example, i was belt-whipped regularly as a child. Not fun. Very traumatic. When i begged my Master to own me, he knew this history. Did it prevent him from belting me? No. HOWEVER, there was a lot of time and many discussions PRIOR to my first belting....about the difference between childhood abuse and receiving what my Master doles to me...about understanding he is safe, at all times. Lots of time was spent exploring my brain on the subject of beltings, and when he deemed it was time for me to face that fear, he did it appropriately (in my humble opinion), introducing the belt to me by way of having me kiss it, smell it, love it....before he ever struck me with it. Damn, if he had just pulled that baby out and whacked me without preparing me, i would have been institutionalized (okay that's an exaggeration). That would have had nothing to do with my submission and everything to do with being traumatized.
|