aravain
Posts: 1211
Joined: 8/26/2008 Status: offline
|
Maybe in your state, not in mine. And they don't need to give that as the reason for denial of service. "I assert my right as manager/owner of this private establishment to deny service to anyone for any reason" and bam, the nursing mother doesn't have a leg to stand on; she must leave... as far as I know, no state has ever compelled any establishment to serve people when using that to expel them (or upheld the expelled person's 'right' to be on their private property). But this is only in the case of someone who refuses to move to a private area. It would be the same as me talking loudly, or lewdly, and upsetting the gentleman down a couple tables. If I'm asked to move/quiet down/whatever and do not, they can deny me service. Quite simply, they *have* a valid reason, even if they *don't* use it. "Mr. Aravain was upsetting other customers with his behavior" is enough of a reason to eject anyone legally. Notice how behavior is unspecified? The courts (or the government) can't compell a service/salesperson to sell to someone in a group setting who is upsetting other customers. You may be allowed to breast feed, legally, in PUBLIC, but in a restaurant you're in private property, where it is *not* your right to be there. You can be ejected at any time without a reason given (even if that reason is that you're breast feeding and refuse to do so elsewhere, if they eject you without using that as the reason, there's no legality issue). The fact that it IS illegal in those 12 states signals a strangeness to me, especially if, as you imply, it covers PRIVATE property where they are receiving/purchasing a service. @Kittin I have *never* tried to hide my distaste for female genitalia, however, I *would* (and DO) have a problem with similar displays (discreet or not) of male genitalia in public, too, for what it's worth. And I dunno anyone irl who'd call me a prude.
|