RE: Now... is it just me...? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


KMsAngel -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 5:21:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Belittled

quote:

ORIGINAL: KMsAngel
you need to be aware of the arguments your sidekick is providing before you get hoist by them yourself


I think reading would help. Also, a dictionary. Maybe look up "attack", and then "argument".
It'll help you understand where fallacious rebuttals work and where they don't.



lol, that hurt a little bit, did it?

let me guess, one or both of you is hoping to be in the legal profession. and all that pre-law stuff you read is coming in really helpful here when you can use those words that you've JUST learned!




Politesub53 -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 5:29:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

holly....after all those posts...you are trolling?????....I am shocked!....dismayed.....I stand in jaw dropping disbelief!!!!!

I have never known a troll with  23,471 posts!

*sniff*
i knew i would be found out eventually, Mark.
*sob*




Your perseverance paid off Holly [;)]




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 6:03:53 PM)

Well hell, if you never posted a question or comment in the Gorean section, then of course you were not replied to. Also, I suggest maybe you stop listening to role players of Gor. If you want to have a serious discussion, come on over and ask your questions in the Gorean section. I doubt I will see you posting there though, and instead will get silence.




thornhappy -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 7:56:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Wow!  I just snorted my grilled cheese sandwich through my nose!

You are a woman of strange and unusual talents!




Belittled -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 8:11:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KMsAngel
let me guess, one or both of you is hoping to be in the legal profession. and all that pre-law stuff you read is coming in really helpful here when you can use those words that you've JUST learned!


Nah, it's called General Education.




KMsAngel -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 8:21:53 PM)

glad to see school is improving over there if that's gen ed.

wasn't that good when i was there. half my first year of uni was a waste of time and money while i had to creatively twiddle my fingers waiting for the rest of the people to catch up with stuff that SHOULD have been gen ed in hs.




lovingpet -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 8:24:52 PM)

Guess what I did guys??????   I had a question about Gorean stuff, so I did this really insane and radical thing and posted the question in the Gorean Lifestyles forum!!!!!!  I know!!!!!!  How stupid could I possibly be?????  LOL

lovingpet




GotSteel -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 8:46:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah

Jim Jones was a Christian Does that mean Christians are just as suspect?

Steel


This isn't a good analogy because, unlike the free for all that is christianity, scientology is trademarked: http://dianetics.lronhubbard.org/tmnotice.htm However, my point isn't about what scientology is or isn't. My point is that just like a number of people on this forum have said one should actually research what gor is before posting about it, one should learn what scientology is before posting about it.




NorthernGent -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 3:08:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

http://www.geocities.com/delphius2002/id83.htm



The author is keen to stress that Gor isn't a one size fits all. Fair enough.

The author is keen to stress that Gor is not akin to Fascism. Fair enough.

The author is keen to stress that no two people are the same and hold differeing talents and skills. I'd say this is self-evident when you look around any room full of people.

The author stresses that equality laws are designed to protect the inferior. Now we're probably getting to the root of the issue - there's a spot of Nietzsche in this thought process. Equality laws however (certainly in England) are not designed to make everyone equal; they are designed to ensure that people get a fair crack of the whip and have the foundations in place from which to succeed or fail from a level playing field. The difference isn't even subtle.

"They hold that it is the desire of the inferiors to be placed on the same level as their superiors"
 
Or conversely Gorean philosophy is the desire of equals to fulfill their ambitions of self-proclaimed superiority.

Two questions remain unanswered for me:

1) What makes one inferior or superior according to Gorean philosophy - it is a stretch to equate differing skills and talents to inferiority and superiority. It would be useful were someone to fill in the missing link. From my point of view these are grand ideas in the same vein as Communism; the idea may be different but they are underpinned by the same common denominator: an appeal to abstract notions (which can never be proven) at the expense of the experience of human behaviour.

2) It would be useful too were someone to describe what exactly is the 'natural order' (it's not clear from the author in the link).




tazzygirl -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 3:45:55 AM)

hi NorthernGent

i could only add my own theory. and i think that the questions you posed would be best left to a gorean Free to respond too. i could try, but they would only be the wonderings of someone who does not identify with being Free.

well wishes

tazzy




NorthernGent -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 4:17:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

hi NorthernGent

i could only add my own theory. and i think that the questions you posed would be best left to a gorean Free to respond too. i could try, but they would only be the wonderings of someone who does not identify with being Free.

well wishes

tazzy


Hi Tazzy:

Well I've posted on the Gorean section for a response. I'm sure someone can put some meat on bones.

Thanks for the reply.

P.S. No harm in posting what you think....




sirsholly -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 4:19:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

Guess what I did guys??????   I had a question about Gorean stuff, so I did this really insane and radical thing and posted the question in the Gorean Lifestyles forum!!!!!!  I know!!!!!!  How stupid could I possibly be?????  LOL

lovingpet
*blinkblink*

:::::THUD:::::




lovingpet -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 5:56:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

Guess what I did guys??????   I had a question about Gorean stuff, so I did this really insane and radical thing and posted the question in the Gorean Lifestyles forum!!!!!!  I know!!!!!!  How stupid could I possibly be?????  LOL

lovingpet
*blinkblink*

:::::THUD:::::



[8D]




DemonKia -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 5:57:25 AM)

FR, after skim thru

*carefully tiptoes past the actual, substantive discussion about issues Gorean, & about which this demon has darn little interest or opinion*

I have a bit of a fetish for rational argumentation, & in particular for the avoidance of ad hom; I think ad hom makes its users look abusive & moronic, but that's just me . . . .. &, ya know, the more so, the more so, that &: two wrongs don't make things correct; being 'just as bad as' is equally ugly; & fallacious reasoning is fallacious reasoning is fallacious reasoning, no matter how it's used . . . .

I freaking love this about online fora: it makes words into concrete, renders them visible, ineradicable, contributes to transparency & accountability. Once it's out there the poster is stuck with it . .. . . & for those of us with a decent memory, it makes confirming those memories a relatively simple thing. I took a coupla minutes (hint: use the 'Find' function, lol) & went looking for the following (I stripped out the irrelevancies.):

quote:

ORIGINAL: Belittled

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
  1. Person A makes claim X.
  2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
  3. Therefore A's claim is false.
...
Aren't we a little old to battle in verbal cock-fights? Well, apparently we're not, but, you get my point.
...
You can trust me, my schooling wasn't 50 years ago.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Belittled

I honestly find it amusing how age, once again, has slipped its way into a valid argument.
Can't the oldies get over it? Honestly. And no worries on the "you look stupid" thing, stupid seems to be the only language that the senile speak now-a-days.


& your submissive's contributions:

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

...I don't see how the IDEA that since my pubes haven't grayed and my delicate features haven't wrinkled, that my opinions carry less weight.

... if you ... have any sort of ability to comprehend- well... anything...


quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

Someone with a Billy Ray Cyrus style hairstyle is talking about a lack of intelligence in anyone else? ...


Ah. & just for the fun of it, from the journal entries on Belittled's profile:

quote:

6/27/2009 11:09:36 AM [Report Entry]
Who the fuck came up with the idea that heart conditions, gray pubes, and prostate exams make your argument more valid?

Just cause you're closer to death doesn't make you more important, grandpa.


quote:

6/27/2009 2:07:28 AM [Report Entry]
I don't get it.

Why are the ugly people the most willing to actually say shit?

It's so useless when you're worthless and have something to say.

True story. :)


quote:

5/31/2009 2:15:38 AM [Report Entry]

K bitches, listen up.

I am sick and tired of hearing about your little puny cocks. I don't give a shit that it's as big as your IQ or as worthless as your love life. If it's truly small, I heard electrical sockets are comfortable.

And also,
If you wear drag, just don't bother.
If you have a cock and would like to cover it up in a skirt and heels, stop looking at my profile.

I'm here purely for entertainment. For kicks. For some chatting. Not to gag everytime I check my mail.

Also, if you send me a message degrading yourself, where you call yourself stupid, a sissy, and whatever else you would like to assume the role of, then you can move on. I refuse to associate with people that are shit. Brainless. Useless. I am first and foremost a member of society. I don't need some bullshit about how lame you are.

We both know it.
No need to advertise it.


{Emphasis DemonKia's.}

quote:

4/13/2009 12:01:22 PM [Report Entry]
The journal is back. D:
And I'm tired of hearing about experience.
I get it.
If you don't have experience, you're bound to make mistakes.
Honestly, I think common sense is a bit more important. I only have a handful of years under my belt, but I was pretty much doing now what I did then.

I'm tired of the, "Hi I'm.... I'm a very experience Dom.."
I don't give a shit.
Are you interesting? Smart? Are you into what I'm into?
Cause your experience isn't going to make me scream in bed. It's not going to make me feel amazing about myself.
It's not going to make me respect you more.

Get over yourself.
Old is old.
Drop the experience bullshit.


So. Pot. Kettle. Black.

I kinda feel sorry for all those young people who denigrate aging & those older than themselves, simply on the basis of aging; given that if one is lucky enough to survive that long, age happens -- wrinkles, grey pubes, all that. Those who engage in this paint themselves into a corner ultimately, or they change their minds -- the choice ultimately becomes between embracing the inevitable aging, or increasingly hating the grey & wrinkled self that one becomes. & that's truly sad, those I've known who steer this path have ended up being tragic figures, whether they're world-famous celebrities or people much closer to my heart . . . . . . & age-ism & attractiveness bias, from either direction, is as unsavory as all the other repellent -isms . . . . . In my not-so-humble . . . . . (LOL, & how revolutionary & rebellious is it to worship youth in a youth-obsessed culture, to denigrate aging in a society that despises aging? I decided in my youth to embrace aging in part because that seemed to me to actually be an insurrectionist policy to hold, lol . . .. . .)




Hmmmmm. Interesting username -- belittle verb { trans. } make (someone or something) seem unimportant . . . So, the impression I'd take from your username, whether you like it or not, is that you are Belittled, ie, unimportant . . . . Or at least you seem to want it that way . . . . I'm a writer in part because I'm a bit of a vocabulary fetishist; words matter, to me . ...




Oh, & I will incidentally address the OP, for the benefit of the dozens of others who may read my words: if I find some set of beliefs offensive, ignorant, or whatever, I generally have zero interest in listening to exposition about those beliefs. I got my fill of that in my youth with the various Christians who would happily go on & on & on, validating & elucidating their beliefs at great length. I have better uses for my time, like being amused at the highjacking highjinks in response to posts that can be perceived as trollish, lol . . . .




Ah. Final note. The banter of the other posters entertained me. I'm gonna make use of that lovely 'Hide' feature, tho' I suspect that it will be unnecessary; this is a tough crowd for the disrespectful & the trollishly inclined, lol, & those who display that kind of inclination don't last long here . . . . . I personally don't get any kicks out of provoking individuals who identify as dominant & / or sadistic, but I find those who do generate all kinds of funny replies . . . . . . & I posted this to edify those I know will find this post useful & / or entertaining. It was fun putting this together, thanks . . . . . . I'm a writer & a thinker & I love the opportunity to do both . . . . .

Fin




IronBear -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 8:35:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Well hell, if you never posted a question or comment in the Gorean section, then of course you were not replied to. Also, I suggest maybe you stop listening to role players of Gor. If you want to have a serious discussion, come on over and ask your questions in the Gorean section. I doubt I will see you posting there though, and instead will get silence.


Of course old friend there is this: Cum tacent, clamant - When they remain silent, they cry out. (Their silence speaks louder than words) (Cicero)





YoungLust -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 11:45:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DemonKia

FR, after skim thru

*carefully tiptoes past the actual, substantive discussion about issues Gorean, & about which this demon has darn little interest or opinion*

I have a bit of a fetish for rational argumentation, & in particular for the avoidance of ad hom; I think ad hom makes its users look abusive & moronic, but that's just me . . . .. &, ya know, the more so, the more so, that &: two wrongs don't make things correct; being 'just as bad as' is equally ugly; & fallacious reasoning is fallacious reasoning is fallacious reasoning, no matter how it's used . . . .

I freaking love this about online fora: it makes words into concrete, renders them visible, ineradicable, contributes to transparency & accountability. Once it's out there the poster is stuck with it . .. . . & for those of us with a decent memory, it makes confirming those memories a relatively simple thing. I took a coupla minutes (hint: use the 'Find' function, lol) & went looking for the following (I stripped out the irrelevancies.):

quote:

ORIGINAL: Belittled

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
  1. Person A makes claim X.
  2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
  3. Therefore A's claim is false.
...
Aren't we a little old to battle in verbal cock-fights? Well, apparently we're not, but, you get my point.
...
You can trust me, my schooling wasn't 50 years ago.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Belittled

I honestly find it amusing how age, once again, has slipped its way into a valid argument.
Can't the oldies get over it? Honestly. And no worries on the "you look stupid" thing, stupid seems to be the only language that the senile speak now-a-days.


& your submissive's contributions:

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

...I don't see how the IDEA that since my pubes haven't grayed and my delicate features haven't wrinkled, that my opinions carry less weight.

... if you ... have any sort of ability to comprehend- well... anything...


quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

Someone with a Billy Ray Cyrus style hairstyle is talking about a lack of intelligence in anyone else? ...


Ah. & just for the fun of it, from the journal entries on Belittled's profile:

quote:

6/27/2009 11:09:36 AM [Report Entry]
Who the fuck came up with the idea that heart conditions, gray pubes, and prostate exams make your argument more valid?

Just cause you're closer to death doesn't make you more important, grandpa.


quote:

6/27/2009 2:07:28 AM [Report Entry]
I don't get it.

Why are the ugly people the most willing to actually say shit?

It's so useless when you're worthless and have something to say.

True story. :)


quote:

5/31/2009 2:15:38 AM [Report Entry]

K bitches, listen up.

I am sick and tired of hearing about your little puny cocks. I don't give a shit that it's as big as your IQ or as worthless as your love life. If it's truly small, I heard electrical sockets are comfortable.

And also,
If you wear drag, just don't bother.
If you have a cock and would like to cover it up in a skirt and heels, stop looking at my profile.

I'm here purely for entertainment. For kicks. For some chatting. Not to gag everytime I check my mail.

Also, if you send me a message degrading yourself, where you call yourself stupid, a sissy, and whatever else you would like to assume the role of, then you can move on. I refuse to associate with people that are shit. Brainless. Useless. I am first and foremost a member of society. I don't need some bullshit about how lame you are.

We both know it.
No need to advertise it.


{Emphasis DemonKia's.}

quote:

4/13/2009 12:01:22 PM [Report Entry]
The journal is back. D:
And I'm tired of hearing about experience.
I get it.
If you don't have experience, you're bound to make mistakes.
Honestly, I think common sense is a bit more important. I only have a handful of years under my belt, but I was pretty much doing now what I did then.

I'm tired of the, "Hi I'm.... I'm a very experience Dom.."
I don't give a shit.
Are you interesting? Smart? Are you into what I'm into?
Cause your experience isn't going to make me scream in bed. It's not going to make me feel amazing about myself.
It's not going to make me respect you more.

Get over yourself.
Old is old.
Drop the experience bullshit.


So. Pot. Kettle. Black.

I kinda feel sorry for all those young people who denigrate aging & those older than themselves, simply on the basis of aging; given that if one is lucky enough to survive that long, age happens -- wrinkles, grey pubes, all that. Those who engage in this paint themselves into a corner ultimately, or they change their minds -- the choice ultimately becomes between embracing the inevitable aging, or increasingly hating the grey & wrinkled self that one becomes. & that's truly sad, those I've known who steer this path have ended up being tragic figures, whether they're world-famous celebrities or people much closer to my heart . . . . . . & age-ism & attractiveness bias, from either direction, is as unsavory as all the other repellent -isms . . . . . In my not-so-humble . . . . . (LOL, & how revolutionary & rebellious is it to worship youth in a youth-obsessed culture, to denigrate aging in a society that despises aging? I decided in my youth to embrace aging in part because that seemed to me to actually be an insurrectionist policy to hold, lol . . .. . .)




Hmmmmm. Interesting username -- belittle verb { trans. } make (someone or something) seem unimportant . . . So, the impression I'd take from your username, whether you like it or not, is that you are Belittled, ie, unimportant . . . . Or at least you seem to want it that way . . . . I'm a writer in part because I'm a bit of a vocabulary fetishist; words matter, to me . ...




Oh, & I will incidentally address the OP, for the benefit of the dozens of others who may read my words: if I find some set of beliefs offensive, ignorant, or whatever, I generally have zero interest in listening to exposition about those beliefs. I got my fill of that in my youth with the various Christians who would happily go on & on & on, validating & elucidating their beliefs at great length. I have better uses for my time, like being amused at the highjacking highjinks in response to posts that can be perceived as trollish, lol . . . .




Ah. Final note. The banter of the other posters entertained me. I'm gonna make use of that lovely 'Hide' feature, tho' I suspect that it will be unnecessary; this is a tough crowd for the disrespectful & the trollishly inclined, lol, & those who display that kind of inclination don't last long here . . . . . I personally don't get any kicks out of provoking individuals who identify as dominant & / or sadistic, but I find those who do generate all kinds of funny replies . . . . . . & I posted this to edify those I know will find this post useful & / or entertaining. It was fun putting this together, thanks . . . . . . I'm a writer & a thinker & I love the opportunity to do both . . . . .

Fin
Lol. insult fail.

You just made this topic a win.




Apocalypso -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 12:19:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust
You just made this topic a win.
How would you possibly know?  You are, after all, the cancer that is killing /b/.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 12:27:23 PM)

http://www.flayme.com/troll/newsgroups.shtml

My favorite quote here is that an internet troll is an asshole looking for a body to attach itself to.[;)]

Oh, yeah.  And... trolls tend to be pedantic, unable to admit they are wrong, and sexually immature.

Has anyone else noticed that... or is it just me?




Anarrus -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 12:59:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

quote:

But, I would like Goreans to validate their belief system.

Hahahaha! Sorry, OP. I'm not a particular fan of the Gorean lifestyle, but I suspect that most Goreans would find that remark rather humorous.


Yep, it's pretty amusing, laughable in fact.





Apocalypso -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/28/2009 1:03:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

http://www.flayme.com/troll/newsgroups.shtml

My favorite quote here is that an internet troll is an asshole looking for a body to attach itself to.[;)]

Oh, yeah.  And... trolls tend to be pedantic, unable to admit they are wrong, and sexually immature.

Has anyone else noticed that... or is it just me?

To be fair, we're not talking about a particuarly competent pair of trolls here.  Too obvious, apart from anything else.

I'd hazard a guess that we're dealing with a couple of Something Awful rejects.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875