RE: Now... is it just me...? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


YoungLust -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 3:53:51 PM)

Lol, then you're accepting of some ridiculous things.

Lighten up, sugar... it's the internets.




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 3:59:30 PM)

If you are using the word validation in context with defending ones beliefs, then rationalization is not something that would be expected of anyone.  Unless, of course, they felt inclined, compelled, or were proselytising.  I rather doubt Goreans are inclined toward any of the above.  At least, I've yet to come across any recruiting door-to-door proselytising Gorean zealots.

If you are using the word validation in context with legalizing, or providing legal sanction - then the debate would likely go a different direction. 

WinD




GreedyTop -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:01:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

Lol, then you're accepting of some ridiculous things.

Lighten up, sugar... it's the internets.



Kiddo.. I'm accepting that not everything that *I* believe in is going to be a shared view with everyone else. 

YOU need to lighten up. 







OrionTheWolf -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:03:33 PM)

You are selectively avoiding reading the responses with substance, as well as being directed to a link that goes to a topic in this forum that has a lot of information. Instead you concentrate on the posts that you were actually trying to illicit, and that is trolling.


quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

And here's the thing.... Many of you say that no one should have to validate their lifestyle and beliefs.

What if my life style involved an inherent belief that Caucasians were superior to African Americans and thus African Americans should be submissive to and/or the slaves of white people. That would be offensive. The burden of proof doesn't fall upon the non-believer when dealing with matters such as racial inequality or gender bias. I have made some rather contentious statements, but no one has delivered any sensical rebuttal beyond "don't feed teh trolls plz".

What, if any, is the basis for the gender inequality within the Gorean code?

edit: Man, there was a 6th page already? These old eyes are deceiving me :(





MarsBonfire -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:04:22 PM)

This is another aspect that I really wish someone would actually supply details on. The Gor folks keep saying "Oh, Gor is a mish-mash of all sorts of philosophy from ancient times." So far, although I've been on this board for going on seven years now... NO ONE has ever written out or linked to a site that listed these "inspirations" to Norman. Nor has there been any discussion, that I've sever seen, of any specific cultural influnces on "Gorean ethics."

It seems to me like you just throw this stuff out there, with little to nothing to back it up.

Any links, guys? Anything at all?




Belittled -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:05:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KMsAngel
you need to be aware of the arguments your sidekick is providing before you get hoist by them yourself


I think reading would help. Also, a dictionary. Maybe look up "attack", and then "argument".
It'll help you understand where fallacious rebuttals work and where they don't.




YoungLust -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:08:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

Lol, then you're accepting of some ridiculous things.

Lighten up, sugar... it's the internets.

Oh, no worries. I'm amused.

Kiddo.. I'm accepting that not everything that *I* believe in is going to be a shared view with everyone else. 

YOU need to lighten up. 








GreedyTop -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:11:07 PM)

I am amused too, since you and your sidekick seem to always focus on posts that have nothing to do with Gor philosophy...

grow a pair..both of ya.







OrionTheWolf -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:19:52 PM)

Norman/Lange did not directly copy, but if you read and study the series, as well as read and study philosophy or some anthropological social structures, it is evident where they spring from.

Sorry Mars but it will not benefit you, just like the times before I refered you to the Gorean FAQ we created in the Gorean section, or the www.silkandsteel.com website. I just do not have the fortitude today to keep going in circles. Have a nice day.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

This is another aspect that I really wish someone would actually supply details on. The Gor folks keep saying "Oh, Gor is a mish-mash of all sorts of philosophy from ancient times." So far, although I've been on this board for going on seven years now... NO ONE has ever written out or linked to a site that listed these "inspirations" to Norman. Nor has there been any discussion, that I've sever seen, of any specific cultural influnces on "Gorean ethics."

It seems to me like you just throw this stuff out there, with little to nothing to back it up.

Any links, guys? Anything at all?




YoungLust -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:24:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

I am amused too, since you and your sidekick seem to always focus on posts that have nothing to do with Gor philosophy...

grow a pair..both of ya.




I will kindly ask that she does not grow a pair because that would upset me very much.

I haven't seen any of the aforementioned responses, maybe I'll try to read more carefully. Every response I've seen has been essentially "You young, trolling asshole... you shoulda asked in the Gorean forum, rabblerabblerabble". Rather tiring, I must say.




tazzygirl -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:25:47 PM)

FR

this is, in my opinion, a great discussion on what is RT Gor, written by Master Luther. included is a more defined definition of natural order. Master Luther posts from time to time on the gorean boards.

http://www.geocities.com/delphius2002/id83.htm

hope it helps, somehow, i doubt it.. might want to pay particular attention to the percentage of slaves on gor and the comments following that.

tazzy




GreedyTop -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:30:50 PM)

you do need to re-read then.  There have been several posts that have tried to give you both an insight. 




sweetsub1957 -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:41:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

(I'm definitely not trying to troll as much as this will seem like I am, but whatevs)
Oh really?  I do not consider myself Gorean, but it sure seems to me like trolling.  It appears to me that you are just trying to stir up shit.  If You were really looking for information, you would've asked these questions in the Gorean forum.
Does the whole Gorean philosophy/lifestyle seem to be like a bdsm version of Scientology?
Does it really matter?  I personally don't live by it, but does that make it wrong for everyone?  No.  To each their own.
A lifestyle based upon the words of a science fiction author, seemingly ridiculous to any outsider who catches a glimpse of it...
As long as we're talking about lifestyles based on fantasy and ridiculousness, what about religions?  I don't happen to agree with them all and IMO there is a lot of fantasy involved in most of them, but I respect others' right to live according to the tenets they want to live by, as long as it's not hurting me.
So yeah, am I the only one who has drawn a parallel to the two?
The two?  I think there's a lot of science fiction and ridiculousness not limited to this.  I think it's very ridiculous that you expect anyone to validate their lifestyle or philosophy to you.  From what I can tell, it's the ideas of Honor and Self-Discipline that the Goreans adhere to which make it attractive to some.  Plus, the last time I checked, we on this site are not suppose to trash anyone else's kink.....and you are doing exactly that. 



quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

I think the true crime is that people are basing lifestyles around books that were so poorly written.
Well, I haven't read the books, but everyone likes different writing styles.  As far as basing lifestyles around books.......refer to my above comments on religions.  People do it all the time. 



Actually it might be kind of interesting if you posted a similar original post in the Gorean forum, so we could all see how fast you get flamed.[:D]

Blessed be,
sweetsub1957






SteelofUtah -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:44:05 PM)

THANK GOD there is only so many weeks before the kids go back to school.

Steel




GotSteel -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:45:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah
If it makes you happy to be a Sceintologist who is getting hurt by it?


http://www.lisamcpherson.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout





Maxwell67 -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:48:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
quote:

ORIGINAL: Maxwell67
I think this is correct also.  When one lives with a set of beliefs which cannot be defended, then the proper response to criticism is no response.  You see this sort of thing regularly online when the beliefs that reinforce bigotry and extremism are attacked.  Sure it sometimes brings the idiots and crazy's out of the woodwork, but the intelligentsia will not dignify your criticism with a serious response (though they might address something else that is being discussed within the same thread). 

Actually this is utter bullshit. Walk up to anyone and ask them to explain their entire life philosophy, and I doubt you will get the entire thing. In the Gorean section we discuss topics all the time, using the series and the philosophers that Norman borrowed from. Now if you ask a specific question, you might get a more specific answer. An example would be "How do you reflect the Caste system in your everyday life?" The answer you may get is "Those of the castes of Gor took great pride in the things that they did, and they had a caste code which they followed. I have developed a Caste code for what I do, and I follow it with pride." From there you might ask a specific follow up question, and then you might get an answer.

When people use certain words that are obviously insulting, or take a condescending attitude, you are likely to get silence.

What is utter bullshit?  Nothing in that statement is particularly off base.  Perhaps you are making the mistake of thinking that I was attacking you or the way in which you practice your philosophy personally, but that is not at all the case.  I admit to having grouped bigots and extremism together, and to be honest, I have never met an extremist Gorean.  I have, however met a large number of Gorean bigots (many of them calling themselves Tuchuks and hanging out in the mountains of Western Pensylvannia, but the vast majority online where it was impossible to tell if they actually understood the Gorean ideals or were simply claiming to be Gorean as an excuse to justify thier bigotry). I doubt that any of the Gorean proponents are going to stand up and defend those parts of their philosophy which justify such bigotry.  You are certainly welcome to prove me wrong on this count, if you like.

quote:


(snip)... a Free Woman in her own home is also considered to have ultimate authority within those walls as well. Patriarchy is the method that is used in the Gor series, and is used in many cultures today. There is no inherent problem with that, except when the duty of care is not fulfilled (I suggest some reading on Patriacrhy to understand what I mean), or when the female part of us being humans is ignored. Nature/God/whatever created the two sexes for a reason, and nature has molded us in certain ways. You can substitute gender roles for the word sexes, as you like. Each portion, masculine/feminine, or dominant/submissive (adjectives and not nouns), function as a whole and not as separate. Just because someone is born male does not automatically mean they are in charge, and just because someone is female does not automatically disqualify them from being a leader.


This I must take issue with.  I know a number of 'Free Women' and not a one of them I have met who is married.. not one.. is not submissive to her husband.  Show me a so-called Free Woman who dances when the music makes her feel sexy or dresses in a way that expresses her sexuality in any overt way within a group of other Goreans and continues to remain free.  I would be very interested in seeing that, because to my knowledge, it does not happen.  In my mind, such heavy restrictions on a womans behavior do not translate to freedom.

quote:


I welcome you to the Gorean section to seriously discuss anything you wish, as it is open to all members of this site. I do recommend that if you go there with a superior attitude, or condescending remarks that you will likely receive silence or ridicule. That is part of human nature. There have been many non-Goreans that have started topics, that continue to add to topics, and have been given much information on each of our personal views on subjects. Making statements such as you have, leads me to believe you have not even read any of the topics in the Gorean section.

I have read several threads in the Gorean section.. some of them quite interesting, intelligent and containing ideas that actually influenced my thinking, however, I have also read threads in which men have attempted to justify their so-called superiority by providing examples of behavior which they believe prove that all women desire to be enslaved.  I have seen discussions on homosexuality and various kinks which are conducted with an air of superiority because no one living a in tune with 'natural law' would bother with such behavior.  I find the Gorean folk, in general to be the most judgmental and least tolerant of all sub-groups involved in the M/s lifestyle. 

As to getting any answers to my own questions, I am the owner of three former Gorean slaves (yes, this is online, for which expect I will get some derision which I will summarily dismiss), two of whom have been 'lifestylers' offline and both of those were Free Women for a time as well, and both have had over a decade of experience.  If I have questions, which I often do, they answer them.  All three like to tell me I am Gorean in all the ways that matter to them. 

However, though I might have some traits in common with many Goreans, I am most certainly not Gorean.  I have a thing for evolving and adapting to circumstance rather than fighting the inevitable fate I can see coming.  I have progressive views and a need to remain involved with the world at large instead of withdrawing from it to live my life my way.  I am not an island, I am a part of a much greater whole which I am proud to contribute to and I understand that compromises must be made to do so.  And I do not believe that I am inherently superior to anyone either by virtue of gender or of my dominance.  Those traits have never been shown to me by any Gorean man I have spent enough time with to really get to know.  I am not saying such men are not out there, but I am saying I have met many men claiming to be Gorean, and I have yet to meet one who has not over time shown themselves to be incapable of tolerating the world beyond their narrow views.

So why should I want to participate in any discussion in the Gorean forums here or anywhere else?  Sorry I am far too busy learning, growing and evolving to waste my time with such nonsense.




SteelofUtah -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:51:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah
If it makes you happy to be a Sceintologist who is getting hurt by it?


http://www.lisamcpherson.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout




Where I did not know this before my comment and it is obviously disturbing..... There is MUCH that is nothing more that Accusation in those links. I am not saying that they are incorrect however there are many things that were not followed up on they just say Scientologists and leave that discription as enough.

Jim Jones was a Christian Does that mean Christians are just as suspect?

Steel




sirsholly -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:54:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YoungLust

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

I don't see how the IDEA that since my pubes haven't grayed and my delicate features haven't wrinkled, that my opinions carry less weight.
opinions are not deemed weightless by a lack of  grey hair and wrinkles. Rather, by intelligence or lack there of.
Someone with a Billy Ray Cyrus style hairstyle is talking about a lack of intelligence in anyone else?

For an anti-troll, you're trolling pretty damn hard.

shhhhh.... don't tell my heart...my achy breaky heart....




sirsholly -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:55:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

holly....after all those posts...you are trolling?????....I am shocked!....dismayed.....I stand in jaw dropping disbelief!!!!!

I have never known a troll with  23,471 posts!

*sniff*
i knew i would be found out eventually, Mark.
*sob*





sirsholly -> RE: Now... is it just me...? (6/27/2009 4:58:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

"opinions are not deemed weightless by a lack of  grey hair and wrinkles. Rather, by intelligence or lack there of." If gray hair were the determining factor I'd be the KING!!!!!........
[sm=imking.gif] <---here ya go Mark




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875