RE: are we all "equal"? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


NorthernGent -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:24:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

Equality is a pretty myth



What makes equality more of a myth than inequality? Just out of curioisty here.....




NihilusZero -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:25:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam

A slave in our local community wrapped this up nicely for me: We are of equal value but not of equal status.

Master Fire


While I may personally find this an attractive sentiment, it is also not necessarily applicable as I've seen sub/slaves that admit and are okay with being in a situation where they are less important to the relationship than their D-type.

Realistically, there is no actual barometer to measure this either. All we have is whether all partners in a relationships that would be built on such an equality feel that they are relatively equally important.




NihilusZero -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:32:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

Equality is a pretty myth



What makes equality more of a myth than inequality? Just out of curioisty here.....

Inequality is a fact of life. Biology alone would tell us that. We use the term to permit a feelgood concept of equal "worth and value" to each individual, while the very constructs of that worth and value are subjective and insubstantial.

This comes back to the notion that many people want to feel that what they have to offer to a relationship is of equitable value to that of their partner. Humans naturally gravitate towards such thinking and acting (which, unfortunately, is probably why I'm not dating Shirley Manson). But since there is no way to measure this (and, most people wouldn't want it to be measured anyway) it remains one of those concepts that we tell ourselves in order to feel at peace where we are or as a tautological expression of a relationship that just happens to be balanced well enough to warrant the mentality.




barelynangel -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:40:24 PM)

As i know slavery and being owned by a Man, a slave only has the value her Master determines and this is usually assessed along with the cost for him to keep her  -- for it is HIS definition of same which determines when her cost becomes higher than her value and possibly not worth keeping around.  Because the Man is the one who maintains the slave as a slave to him due to his decision to continue the cost of mastering and enslaving her to him.  The value he places upon her i highly doubt would be an equal value to himself, as for him to do so would cause a conflict of interest because in order to determine whether or not her cost exceeds her value to him, he could not actually simply assess her value as EQUAL to his and then evaluate the cost efficiently.

I know many never like this type of thought, but to me, its simply how being a slave to a Man is assessed.  There is no security of equal value to him that is some kind of right or inherent allowance.  A slave is assessed because she MUST maintain value to him that exceeds his cost or he may choose to allow her to find someone else who is willing to pay such a high cost for such low value.

angel





tazzygirl -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:44:51 PM)

i see those facets of fullfilling each others needs not as equality, but as compatability. can you fill my needs, can i fill yours... are we compatable enough to give each other what we want/need/desire.

quote:



Yes, we would be equal, just that I'd be in charge.

Few things are more moronic than the idea of superiority, either in a gender sense, or a D/s sense.


if what you say is true, what gives you the right to call others moronic? name calling in the middle of a debate is used for nothing more than to try and incite. please, try and refrain, it serves no good purpose.

quote:

ORIGINAL: oceanwinds

Our value to life holds equal opportunity in the areas that we are good at. I am an excellent cook, and I know males who are just as good, perhaps some better and some not. I cannot sew but late hubby was great at that, and made most of our leather things, as well as garments we wore for pagan rituals at times. We both were good with growing flowers and vegs, so is Sir. He is better at focus and mastering his emotions, i am striving for that myself.

I believe equal is becoming all you can be in this world. Some are great in logic, others in abstract. Some are better in dealing with other people, some are not. But we all have something of worth to give to this world, hence this is what makes us equal. Ds or Ms is giving the all that you are in that situation. What you give to it has worth.



equal opportunity is indeed afforded to each of us. but, it is up to us to try and grasp it, to excell at whatever we are good at. equal opportunity does not make us "equals". it only gives us the chance, not bthe entitlement. and, yes, we all have worth. im not implying we dont. nor, again, do i see myself as "less" than Master. i just see him as not my equal, because i have given him the power over me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
in my way of thinking, the minute i turn to a man and say... i am giving up control to your wisdom... i am giving up my right to be equal to that man. im still waiting to hear an argument against this.


But that depends if you see yourself as equal to that man before you do the giving up control thing?
For me, I never saw myself as equal anyway. I don't see myself equal to anyone. So when I hand over authority to another, we were not equal in the first place.

the.dark.


i see your point dark. so, perhaps the question is, do we see ourselves as not being equal to anyone. and in this, i have to agree. i am not equal to anyone. no one had the same exact life as i have had to this moment in my life. education, opportunities, health, relationships... all that is different, as a whole, from everyone elses.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Missokyst

I am equal in that I am the sum of my parts. Add up my life, skills, experience, and taste .. it pretty much adds up to who I am now. I don't judge myself by anothers yardstick. The fact that I can dominate life, or submit to a man does not make me more or less in my eyes.
Kyst


so there is only more, less, or equal, in your eyes. what happened to the idea of just being.. different? must we all be equal, the same?


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant



Somehow along the way, the goals of the founding fathers got screwed up and people began thinking that there should be equal OUTCOME rather than equal OPPORTUNITY but that's for a political thread.

There is no equality in relationships either. Sometimes things are going to go more your way and sometimes things are going to go more your partner's way, at least in vanilla relationships. In D/s, if you are really looking at the dynamic, and you have a healthy D/s dynamic that works for you, there really is more equality going on...in terms of outcome...than in many non D/s relationships and that is because the submissive is having his/her wants and needs and desires cared for by the dominant and the dominant is having his/her wants and needs and desires cared for by the submissive. His need to be responsible, her need to serve are being met, etc, etc, etc.. From that abstract position, that is where you find the equality. The inequality comes in in that the dominant has the ability to make final decisions, it is the dominant whose wants and desires and needs (but not basic needs, as discussed in other threads) that come first. The inequality comes in in that the submissive has the right to make something that was not a hard limit before a hard limit now. The submissive has the right, no matter how deeply the dominant owns and controls her, to say "No". The equality comes back in in the recognition by both the submissive and the dominant that abdication of the dominant's responsibilities or the invoking of the choice of "No" by the submissive alters the dynamic.

There is equality to be found within the inequality and inequality to be found within the equality. Master FireMa'am's slave acquaintance put it nicely...We are of equal value but not of equal status. That does not make either party inferior or superior nor does it make them equal. It makes them partners who understand that life isn't always fair but on balance, it is what works best.


this i find interesting... the first bolded section, i have a bit of trouble with. a Dominant has the ability to decide IF he will fullfill teh submissives desires and wants... needs should always be met, in my opinion. the submissive will always strive to fullfill the D's wants, desires and needs. a slight difference, i think.

the second bolded part i could not agree more with. my value, in Master's eyes, rise with my obedience. i can see a man coming to the point where he will look at the woman (or the woman looks at the male submissive) and states... you have no equal in my eyes.

then again, i already knew that. i have no equal. not do i want one, or do i expect to become equal to anyone else. what i have, i worked for, what i dont have, i didnt deem worthy of my efforts. but if you list all my accomplishments, all my failures, all my trials and experiences, my education, my work history, my wants, desires, needs, ect ect ect... you will find no one is my equal. that does not make me better, that does not make me inferior... it makes me ... different.




digits80 -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:52:00 PM)

LOL......we are now dealing with a generation that grew up being equal.  In sports everyone got a trophy, in academics no one fails!

What a joke!  No two people are equal! We are different but the true fact is that everyone judges everyone everyday.  So it may hurt someones feelings that someone else has rated another above them but that is life.  We have become to politically correct.  As long as you are happy with who you are, and that you are happy with the opinion of others that you care about, who cares about other opinions.  So my ranking of people may be different than yours but if you rank me as a non-equal than my opinion should not matter.

LOL, then I should not be on a message board (or at least care about the comments here)




Drakontos -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:52:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

borrowed from another thread, this had me wondering last night. the following is an article found discussing equality both in the real sense of the word, and in the sense of it being used in a D/s, BDSM way.

http://www.domsub.info/equality.shtml

to those who serve, do you feel you are equal to your owner? why or why not?

to those who control? do you feel you are equal to those who serve you? why or why not?

and to both who do not see yourselves as equal to the other person in your relationsip... do you see that inequality as inferior?

zaphira is not on equal footing/equal to/equal with/equal anything in comparison to Master; nor does she wish to be so. zaphira is a servant; property. If Master saw this slave as equal to himself, our relationship would no longer be what iit is. If zaphira saw herself as equal to Master; it would destroy OUR particualar dynamic and reduce our relationship to that of 'normal'.
zaphira enjoys her relationship with Master. She has no desire to ever see it change.

As for if I see myself as inferior; yes. zaphira is inferior to Master. He is the owner, zaphira is property. There can be no equal status in Master's house.




IrishMist -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 1:56:16 PM)

Are we all equal? No, we are not.
quote:

to those who serve, do you feel you are equal to your owner? why or why not?

When I was in a relationship; no, there was no equality between us; nor did I ever hope that there could be. And yes, I always saw him as being superior to me; and myself as being inferior.

No big reason why; it's just the way I saw things.




tazzygirl -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:02:01 PM)

hi mist

i tried that on the way back from lunch with Master today. we were on the escalator, and he was above me... i looked up and smiles and said.. so tall.. so manly... so superior. the look i got told me to never voice that again, even though he knew i was teasing in part. Master doesnt see me as less than him.. just different. there are so many things i can do that he cant.. and so much he can do that i cant.. we celebrate our differences. but, still, in my eyes, he is who i look up too, turn too, rely upon... he isnt my equal, the need for him to not be my equal is too great.




NorthernGent -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:06:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

Inequality is a fact of life. Biology alone would tell us that.



An explanation would be useful.




IrishMist -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:15:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

hi mist

i tried that on the way back from lunch with Master today. we were on the escalator, and he was above me... i looked up and smiles and said.. so tall.. so manly... so superior. the look i got told me to never voice that again, even though he knew i was teasing in part. Master doesnt see me as less than him.. just different. there are so many things i can do that he cant.. and so much he can do that i cant.. we celebrate our differences. but, still, in my eyes, he is who i look up too, turn too, rely upon... he isnt my equal, the need for him to not be my equal is too great.

Hmm, well...I think you are thinking in different terms than I am.

I don't see somoene as being superior simply because they are a man, stronger, taller, manly, blah blah blah. It has nothing to do with those things at all; those are simply physical traits that a man has that are enhanced in some...I see nothing superior about that at all.

For me, it's an attitude that a man has that gives him an 'air of superiority' that I bow down to [:)] Nothing more and nothing less.




Mercnbeth -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:16:29 PM)

I won't speak to it, but I find myself a bit more than a tad self conscience of my beth's representation of me. That said...

There may not be equality but there is balance. My dominance is balanced by her submission. her abdication of personal financial responsibility is equal to the value she brings to my life and my desire for her to serve no other 'master', financial or other. her surrender to my decisions is equal to my personal ideal of the dynamic of Master and slave. There is balance in how we define those words uniquely for us within our relationship.

However she represents me, it would be meaningless and totally impossible without her. It would not even be desirable to try. My desire to achieve or do anything, is motivated by the relationship. The relationship is the source of all that "FUN" she represents as my "addiction". The relationship doesn't happen, and doesn't exist without her. Taking everything she represents as fact, its still nothing outside the context of balance we provide for each other.

Equality? In the macro, "human" consideration, as if that is critical or important; yeah, we have the same number of chromosomes. Everything else, whether it is a social equality, such as which one of us can and can't go topless on the beach; or a physical comparison as to who can lift more, or who is smarter, or who can cook 'sauce', or who can kick whose ass in Backgammon; is as obvious as it is meaningless. There is no 'better' between us; only respect and appreciation for how whatever skill or ability the other has serves us so well.

Together we are balanced. As the days and years flow past us, we find the pivot point for the fulcrum of that balance getting wider with the passing of each day. The pivot point is the absolute trust we have in each other. Then again, daring to use the word as a 'Master', there is also balance in the love we have for each other.

A question for the OP anyone who thinks equality is important; why is it important to be considered "equal" or to be "equal"? A game where the outcome is always a tie gets boring after a while. The 'game' of life with another person would be mundane and predictable if your partner was equal to you in all ability and knowledge. If it is a given that no two people are exactly alike why assign importance to equality? Shouldn't the goal be complimentary, compatible, balance?




tazzygirl -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:18:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

hi mist

i tried that on the way back from lunch with Master today. we were on the escalator, and he was above me... i looked up and smiles and said.. so tall.. so manly... so superior. the look i got told me to never voice that again, even though he knew i was teasing in part. Master doesnt see me as less than him.. just different. there are so many things i can do that he cant.. and so much he can do that i cant.. we celebrate our differences. but, still, in my eyes, he is who i look up too, turn too, rely upon... he isnt my equal, the need for him to not be my equal is too great.

Hmm, well...I think you are thinking in different terms than I am.

I don't see somoene as being superior simply because they are a man, stronger, taller, manly, blah blah blah. It has nothing to do with those things at all; those are simply physical traits that a man has that are enhanced in some...I see nothing superior about that at all.

For me, it's an attitude that a man has that gives him an 'air of superiority' that I bow down to [:)] Nothing more and nothing less.


what i said to him was a tease.. a joke of sorts... one he typically finds funny. but, the minute i start to put myself down, in his eyes, its no longer funny. as he puts it.. i am slave... that doesnt make me less.. its makes me different.

viva la diference




IrishMist -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:19:36 PM)

quote:

I won't speak to it, but I find myself a bit more than a tad self conscience of my beth's representation of me. That said...

[:D][:D][:D]
Come on Merc...strut your stuff [8D]
quote:

A question for the OP anyone who thinks equality is important; why is it important to be considered "equal" or to be "equal"? A game where the outcome is always a tie gets boring after a while. The 'game' of life with another person would be mundane and predictable if your partner was equal to you in all ability and knowledge? If it is a given that no two people are exactly alike why assign importance to equality? Shouldn't the goal be complimentary, compatible, balance?

Nicely stated
[sm=applause.gif]




IrishMist -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:20:51 PM)

quote:

what i said to him was a tease.. a joke of sorts... one he typically finds funny. but, the minute i start to put myself down, in his eyes, its no longer funny. as he puts it.. i am slave... that doesnt make me less.. its makes me different.

viva la diference

Why would something like that be a put down though?
Inquiring minds want to know.




NorthernGent -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:22:35 PM)

General reply:

Perhaps people who place a great deal of emphasis on 'winning' see life as full of winners and losers/chiefs and indians.

Perhaps people who place more emphasis on enjoying the ride see little value in attempting to divide people into superiors and inferiors.




tazzygirl -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:23:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

I won't speak to it, but I find myself a bit more than a tad self conscience of my beth's representation of me. That said...

There may not be equality but there is balance. My dominance is balanced by her submission. her abdication of personal financial responsibility is equal to the value she brings to my life and my desire for her to serve no other 'master', financial or other. her surrender to my decisions is equal to my personal ideal of the dynamic of Master and slave. There is balance in how we define those words uniquely for us within our relationship.

However she represents me, it would be meaningless and totally impossible without her. It would not even be desirable to try. My desire to achieve or do anything, is motivated by the relationship that doesn't exist without her. Taking everything she represents as fact, its still nothing outside the context of balance we provide for each other.

Equality? In the macro, "human" consideration, as if that is critical or important; yeah, we have the same number of chromosomes. Everything else, whether it is a social equality, such as which one of us can and can't go topless on the beach; or a physical comparison as to who can lift more, or who is smarter, or who can cook 'sauce', or who can kick whose ass in Backgammon; is as obvious as it is meaningless. There is no 'better' between us; only respect and appreciation for how whatever skill or ability the other has serves us so well.

Together we are balanced. As the days and years flow past us, we find the pivot point for the fulcrum of that balance getting wider with the passing of each day. The pivot point is the absolute trust we have in each other. Then again, daring to use the word as a 'Master', there is also balance in the love we have for each other.

A question for the OP anyone who thinks equality is important; why is it important to be considered "equal" or to be "equal"? A game where the outcome is always a tie gets boring after a while. The 'game' of life with another person would be mundane and predictable if your partner was equal to you in all ability and knowledge? If it is a given that no two people are exactly alike why assign importance to equality? Shouldn't the goal be complimentary, compatible, balance?


this topic is a carry over from another thread. i could not agree more with the ideas of being complimentary, compatible, balanced... those words are SO much better than equal, greater than, less than... (i feel like im back in algebra again!)

i feel we do ourselves, our children and society as a whole a great disservice by insisting all is equal. it removes the desire to excell, to be better,.... take competition out of the game.. and we are left with.. why bother to improve?




sweetgirlserves -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:24:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


as he puts it.. i am slave... that doesnt make me less.. its makes me different.

viva la diference


Interesting idea for a Gorean.

~sgs




tazzygirl -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:25:28 PM)

mist

the answer is two fold

one... who wants to own something "inferior"

two... why should i think he would want to own someone inferior




IrishMist -> RE: are we all "equal"? (7/1/2009 2:28:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

mist

the answer is two fold

one... who wants to own something "inferior"

two... why should i think he would want to own someone inferior

You are a slave right?

That in and of itself, should tell you right now that you are inferior in terms of status to him...

why is facing the truth a put down?

Ya'LL make things so complicated when it really does not need to be.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875