LdyWintershade
Posts: 41
Joined: 6/9/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
I think that there are different -types- of respect, and that there is a modicum of respect due in certain situations that is not applied to a -person-, per se, but to an office or a position, and which should hold its station irrelevant of the office/position-holde quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW quote:
Should it be given freely to everyone? Or should one have to earn it? I think that there are different -types- of respect, and that there is a modicum of respect due in certain situations that is not applied to a -person-, per se, but to an office or a position, and which should hold its station irrelevant of the office/position-holder. For example: There is a measure of respect that one has for offices like "judge" or "physician" or "Senator" or "Prime Minister". Regardless of the person, the office is treated with a measure of dignity. Even when, say, a President shows some human flaw, the office garners ones respect as a representation of what it is meant to be. There is another kind of respect that is garnered for skill. We respect the obvious effort it took to learn to do something or become something, regardless of the characteristics of the person. "He may be an ass, but he's a really good chef!" Then there is the respect we offer to an individual who seems to have hir act together, and who exemplifies some or most of the characteristics that we see in a leader, either personally or in a group to which we belong. I think it is -this- kind of respect that people talk about when they talk about having to "earn" respect. It takes a while to get to know someone well enough to be able to say "This is a genuinely -worthy- person, who has earned the right to stand up and be seen in this dignified way, and be treated as a worthy individual by me. This is someone I look up to, and someone I am willing to take advice from with all due seriousness." To me, this is completely separate from what I consider "courtesy", which are the basic manners that we use in how we associate with others. It is the absence of basic -courtesy- that generates the idea of 'rudeness', and courtesy, at least to me, should be applied liberally, without concern for whether an individual has 'earned' any particular status or not. Courtesy can be expanded on in order to display respect, but there is a base level of what I consider "good manners" that can be obtained for just about any situation, and the use of these courtesies, including some marginal use of things like titles and forms of address, is not so much an issue of 'respect of someone else' as it is 'self-respect'. Dame Calla I agree that there are positions that are given respect, regardless of the individual. However, even those can become jaded when the person holding them tarnishes or diminishes them. On the whole, I would agree with the formula introduced by the OP. There is a basic respect I try to show everyone, initially and that either increases or decreases based on how they behave, react, treat others (and me), etc. A bit of an abstraction, but a very interesting question to pose. :)
|