PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
FR, Thank, everyone, for your interesting and helpful comments. LD - Yes, I do think it'd work better if 'She' were to start small and get bigger with those 'injections of dommeliness' (want of a better phrase). A little thing like "Call me Ma'am" or "Contact me once per day" at the start is - wow. "Watch the entire first series of Sex in the City " is going to be too big. A chore that big (and, indeed, appallingly onerous), I think, is something to be saved for when the relationship is already in first gear at least. Blaakman, I think you and RedMagic between you highlight an important point regards the experience, or otherwise, of the dominant in question. As RM says, I'd imagine (more to the point, expect) that a younger woman is a tad more likely to be less experienced than would be an older male at taking the lead. Things would be a lot easier for me otherwise, but I can't take that experience for granted. atypicalsub, she and I didn't talk much before meeting. This was wrong and made me uncomfortable. I'd try to avoid that again. RedMagic, Do you know if she ever told a man ever in her life, "Sit down," or, "Sit down please," in a way that controlled the situation? She may want to be able to do that -- even be hungry for that -- and yet not know how to pull it off, so be nervous about trying. She said that she'd had female slaves before. I presume she knew something about dominating, though not of a male. The fact that she'd had female slaves (and was bi), plus the fact that she'd been a sub herself before, made me wonder whether she did actually know what she wanted. But as for . . . Could you talk to her again, or meet her again? I certainly didn't see any red flags in what you posted. She might just be new. . . . No, there wasn't any spark and I wouldn't want to try again. I really don't think there was anything there. Lockit, I got no sense that she even wanted to discuss anything. We didn't move beyond vanilla - and cool vanilla at that. She wasn't what you'd call a 'communicator'. And, like I said, I find it very difficult to 'be sub' till I know a woman and I get on in a vanilla way. It feels too false otherwise. V, No, I didn't wear any clothes to the meeting with her, except flip-flops and a top hat. Do you see this as a teensy problemette? MzMia, You're clearly more experience than she was. Yes, I'd have a problem getting my head around telling a dominant when the relationship's begun. It takes both parties. But it all comes back to the same thing: if things haven't yet warmed beyond vanilla, it's not going to happen, no matter which side tries to initiate D or s 'vibes'. Dancing, though? Why not? Certainly I'm not the best dancer - handicapped as I am by having three legs (if you catch my drift) - but I'll try that. Always fancied a bit of ballroom dancing, actually. Anything to see 'her' in one of those low-backed ballgowns (yum). Akasha, I don't like submissive posturing . . . . Well, I tried it, made a hash of it, and have concluded I don't like it either. Trembling is one thing, being squirmingly embarrassed is something else. Lashra, You, like Akasha and probably all dominants writing here, are completely clear of your dominant tendencies and know how to act on them. A domme 'pouncing' on me? Oooh, great - bring it on. An order from her to 'Take off your shirt' - oh yes, right away, and hopefully I won't tear it at the buttons. *Sigh* - I wish all dominants were that confident. But I might as well wish for the weather to be hot and sultry in winter. I can't make that assumption, especially not here in good old Blighty. Once again, thank you all for your help. I appreciate it greatly. No luck with that first one and I shan't pursue it. As I always say: there's no point in flogging a barn door after the dead horse has bolted with the spilt milk. Never mind. As I also always say: plenty more fish in the bush. Strong cup of tea, then get back on my bike.
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|