Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer On reflection, I think she may have been feeding me horseshit. She invited me to believe that she'd been a 24/7, naked slave to a master and mistress for some years in Italy. Then she'd had a full-time lesbian relationship. Now, though, she'd decided that she'd had enough of all that and wanted to be a dominant to a male sub. Basically, she didn't know what she wanted. She was fruitcake, wasn't she? I don't see anything wrong with all of the above, or with deciding that she wants something different this time. The snark about her nose sounds like rather petty sour grapes, and there certainly wasn't anything in your post to indicate that she was crazy or weird or deserved to be called a fruitcake. A guy lowering his eyes or doing other submissive body language can be really hot if it seems to come naturally to him, but playing it up makes it come across as fake, which is a turn-off. quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer atypicalsub, she and I didn't talk much before meeting. This was wrong and made me uncomfortable. I'd try to avoid that again. RedMagic,She said that she'd had female slaves before. I presume she knew something about dominating, though not of a male. The fact that she'd had female slaves (and was bi), plus the fact that she'd been a sub herself before, made me wonder whether she did actually know what she wanted. But as for . . . Could you talk to her again, or meet her again? I certainly didn't see any red flags in what you posted. She might just be new. . . . No, there wasn't any spark and I wouldn't want to try again. I really don't think there was anything there. Lockit, I got no sense that she even wanted to discuss anything. We didn't move beyond vanilla - and cool vanilla at that. She wasn't what you'd call a 'communicator'. And, like I said, I find it very difficult to 'be sub' till I know a woman and I get on in a vanilla way. It feels too false otherwise. No luck with that first one and I shan't pursue it. When I was still looking, I usually talked on the phone and via e-mail a few times, until we had some idea of if we had things to talk about, but I don't think it's "wrong" to meet early, and I did so a couple of times. I read a quote somewhere "women are like crockpots and men are like microwaves." It's not universally true, but it frequently takes me a couple of times of playing with someone before I get a lot of sparks. On a first date in a vanilla location with lots of people around, sparks are pretty darned unlikely, but I might pull his hair or bite his neck or something when we're hugging goodbye afterward, if all else went well. Then again, I might not, even if it *did* go well, it depends on a lot of different factors. If you're going to write off every woman who you don't have instant chemistry with, you'll pass up a lot of possibilities who might grow into more with a little patience. In that case, you get what you deserve (or don't get, I suppose). You yourself just said that it's difficult for you to "be sub" until you get to know a woman and get along on a vanilla basis, so how can you expect her to "be dominant" when you've just met and don't know each other yet?
|