DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
FR, after read thru LOL OP, your profile reads like total horny net geek material, all kink & nothing else . ... . . That's a red flag for me . . .... There is the issue that the only labels CM offers kinda 'force' people to put themselves into particular boxes that carry a lot of expectations, assumptions, baggage, & so on . . . . .. Frankly, my experience is a lot of people who think they're 'submissive' are as much or more so 'bottoms', some might even be 'dominant bottoms', lol . .. ... Or they might be better described as 'fetishists' or 'kinksters' . . . ... So, OP, you can be forgiven your confusion as far as this applies to your situation . . . . . . & really, was there ever some time when one could somehow consistently & reliably shop for a compliant submissive with no or few desires of their own? Cuz that sounds like a load of nostalgic hooey . . . .. Oooooooh, & extra demerits for the OP's inability to take critique (another red flag), & straw-man argumentation style -- nobody argued the OP's honesty, so waving that around is distracting from the other posters' actual peer-review thoughts . . .. . & wow, so impressed with the yelling, inability to control temper -- another red flag . . .. .. Oh. & major demerits for demonstrating a serious inability to listen & hear feedback, big giant red flag for me . . . . . (lol . . . . . Where's the unicorn scampering away icon?) More, OP, more . . . . You're meeting some of my entertainment needs, thanks!
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|