CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Prinsexx I need to try to understand this from the dominant perspective. I'm a strong, creative, intelligent woman. I get a great deal of mail: some of the 'hiya wanna chat i wanna own you' type crap to the seriously considered. Sometimes the mail I get surprises me, Like for instance the Dom who wrote and said he had copies parts of my profile and my journal to send to a friend because he was impressed. 'Fans' also who read when I add to my journal. That's great and has the potential to change a grey day into a day of sunshine. BUT why is it that what so attracts others (not only to me but to women I suppose like me) also repels? OK to make it clearer: I run a house, I teach/lecture, I write and am in the process of setting up a publishing house. That seems to attract some very interesting dominants but then what is it in that which also repels them? Is it because a Dominant wants to bring me to my knees but to be able to do so they want to stop me being those things? That they feel I would have no time for the relationship or to serve them? This is not just peculiar to the lifestyle but has also happened to me during vanilla marriage when I was expected to exist within the paradox of being powerful yet also just the llittle woman at home. It just so happens that it is far more crystallised within the dynamic of M/s. So why is it that what attracts also repels? Would really appreciate understanding more about this. Good question with some good answers here. I can't speak for anyone else definitively so let me speak for me, from my perspective as a dominant. I appreciate a competent submissive woman. My first submissive was the business manager of the dental clinic she worked at and at home, she was the dominant partner in marital matters, not her husband. His dominance occurred outside the home. What attracted me, besides her looks-personality-character-intelligence-emotional stability, was the contradiction of her submission to me versus her dominance over all other situations. Tis been mentioned on here that for some dominants, that...the outer world dominance replaced by submission when within their presence... is a difficult and confusing thing to deal with and I guess that shows that there all kinds of variations on this side of the whip. For me, it is attractive. What repels me is something you did mention...emotional complexity of a sort wherein I never know from day to day where those emotions are going to be. What some people see as "dull" in terms of emotional variety, I see...like Dame Calla...as healthy stability when the emotional reactions...the feelings about something, including me...are more or less predictable. I want to know that she is going to love me today in the same way...if not more...as she did yesterday. I want to know that it is not going to take some minor thing to set her off on an emotional soul-search. I'd rather that soul-searching be done over something major or over something I've asked her to probe within herself. What repels me is the submissive who can be so very competent and intelligent in the outside world and yet bring a "dumbed-down" attitude to her submission, mistakenly thinking that it is part of submission. Again, some dominants like that...I don't. I want the same intelligent outlook they bring to their job, their family, their friends to be brought to their submission to me. What repels me is the submissive woman who will dress up for her friends and colleagues and family members but who thinks/assumes that when around me, her mode of dress is going to be "naked". It isn't. I appreciate a well-dressed woman as much as her friends and family and co-workers do. I appreciate the submissive who understands that sometimes, it is what is hidden and yet revealed that is most sexy to me. What repels me is the submissive who, while getting to know her and who, once she is developing a deeper interest in you, displays her sexuality and sensuality combined with her submission but who, once she is yours, begins to let all direction of sexuality be only at my command. That is the one who didn't listen when I said that I expect a submissive who is not only open to her own sexuality but actively looks for ways to express it to be able to behave in that same manner when mine. The cutting off of that "seduction" reminds me too much of sooooooooooooo many vanilla women who are "hot to trot" while being pursued but who, once they have been caught, become lukewarm. I know that for many submissives, it is because they have turned over all sexuality aspects to their dominant but where does it state that yielding of control over their sexual life means that they are no longer a creature imbued with the same wants/desires and the ability to express those that they were before control? These are the sorts of things that repel me...not competence, not intelligence, not the ability to rule the world outside of the D/s dynamic I share with her. What might repel me about that is the inability to set that facet of their personality aside and turn the facet of submission to me without some sort of prodding on my part. If the submission must be constantly prodded, then there would be difficulty but not necessarily repulsion UNLESS it were to continue to be so.
|