rulemylife
Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: QuietlySeeking Problem #1: Current government run programs give direct access to specialists. Solution #1: Force government run programs to mimic for-profit systems which require people to visit primary care physicians and be referred to specialists. How is direct access to specialists less efficient? If I have a foot problem why should I have to go to a primary physician to tell me I have a foot problem and refer me to a podiatrist? Wouldn't cutting out the middle man make it more efficient? quote:
Problem #2: Current gov't run programs allow multiple doctors to run the same diagnostic test and pay for it multiple times. Solution #2: Require the gov't run programs to subscribe to single-diagnostic tests that are then shared amongst providers. And this is a problem unique to government programs? Which in itself is funny, because we've had a big outcry over computerized health records, which the health care proposals call for and which would eliminate these types of redundancy. But, the government would know your health history if we actually put health records into databases, and that seems to be scary for some, though I've yet to understand the reasoning. quote:
Problem #3: Current gov't run programs do not have lifetime caps on insurance which allow people to continue to make whatever healthcare choices without consequence. Solution #3: Almost every private insurer has lifetime caps on insurance payouts. Only the most expensive treatments over many years would every reach these lifetime caps. Do you really believe the majority of people enjoy going to doctors and taking advantage of the resort-like hospital atmospheres that they would take advantage of the system to spend as much time in the hospital as possible? But what about the people who really need the treatment when they reach the private caps? Just too bad for them and let them die? quote:
Problem #4: Emergency room care is the "primary care" for most below the poverty line recipients. Solution #4: Make emergency room care via gov't run programs the same as private insurers. If you aren't admitted, you pay a larger portion of the bill to prevent people from using ERs as physicians' offices. Any facts to back your arguments? Have any proof on this primary care theory? And for that matter, what is it you are defining as primary care? quote:
What makes us think that an inefficient bureaucracy is going to manage our healthcare any better? Are you kidding me? An inefficient bureaucracy is the very definition of any HMO or other health insurer you can name.
|