Under Protection????????

Under Protection???????? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

CelticPrince -> Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:17:50 PM)
To be concise, this just chaps my ass! What does it mean to you? CP

velvetears -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:20:16 PM)
To much online role play and reading rose colored web sites about D/s relationships and protocal.

GeekFreak -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:20:59 PM)
To me it means: "I think you're stupid and won't realize this is a sneak attack into your pants"

Padriag -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:22:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CelticPrince What does it mean to you? Not much [8D]

lovingpet -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:33:48 PM)
Same as under consideration and let's not even get into THAT conversation again! [8\|] lovingpet

tazzygirl -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:34:27 PM)
that he has a harem of on line women who arent smart enough to realize they are the option while he is the priority

NYLass -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:35:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GeekFreak To me it means: "I think you're stupid and won't realize this is a sneak attack into your pants" You should have posted a 'spewage alert'....

lronitulstahp -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:36:43 PM)
quote: this just chaps my ass! rubs a soothing balm made from aromatic oils and aloe vera on CP's tush Is that better???? ~helpful slut

DarkSteven -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:43:40 PM)
I've used it a few times. It's handy when bringing a newcomer to a BDSM event. It's an assurance that they won't be bothered much, and that they'll have a ready reply to those who bug them.

LittleMeganV -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:45:12 PM)
With these you can be chapped and not have to read sillyness from the personal pages. [:D]

ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:47:21 PM)
It means the human race might be just a little better off if the internet weren't so simple even low-grade morons can figure out how to use it.

ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:56:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LittleMeganV With these you can be chapped and not have to read sillyness from the personal pages. [:D] But this is much cheaper!

LittleMeganV -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:59:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote: ORIGINAL: LittleMeganV With these you can be chapped and not have to read sillyness from the personal pages. [:D] But this is much cheaper! No linky.. [:(] Are they panda chaps? (sorry for the thread hi-jack [sm=threadhijack.gif])

lovingpet -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 7:59:23 PM)
Boy this is all really harsh! What is wrong with wanting to express a level of relationship beyond basic friendship in some way that is meaningful to the couple? We all may not agree on the definition, but to me it just denotes some level of commitment prior to higher levels such as perhaps consideration or collaring. Big whoop!!!!! lovingpet who probably ought to get some sleep

daintydimples -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:27:49 PM)
It's seems like BS to me...but then I learned how to protect myself a long time ago.

GeekFreak -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:30:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NYLass quote: ORIGINAL: GeekFreak To me it means: "I think you're stupid and won't realize this is a sneak attack into your pants" You should have posted a 'spewage alert'.... I'm pretty sure this is where I say "That's what she said"...

Danemora -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:32:45 PM)
It apparently doesnt mean a whole hell of alot. I just recently had someone who claimed in their profile to be under the consideration of another dominant contact me.

Daddysredhead -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:34:30 PM)
In my experience, when someone was under another's "protection," it was usually to serve as a buffer if some neanderthal tried to make unwanted advances on her at the club or a play party. More of a big brother type thing than denoting any kind of budding relationship, kind of like having a bodyguard around if needed, just to keep the weirdos or those who don't understand "No thank you" when it's spoken to them, away.

HeavansKeeper -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:49:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CelticPrince To be concise, this just chaps my ass! What does it mean to you? CP Don't mind me as I piss off the woman's studies brigade... I can only note one exception to this, in all my dealings in the world: Of all the women I've ever known, they all adore having someone to call their own. To have, to hold... To have sex with. I've also noted women will out up with laughably stupid shit if it's for their boyfriend/dominant/husband. Most women I know are very protective of their mate, but very loyal. Summing this up, they all prefer a mate to give order to their life. They're 100% aware they can have the freakiest sex with whomever they please... But why don't they? Maybe "under consideration/protection" is a compromise. It gives the girl just enough of a relationship to not feel like a free hooker when she gets the text message "come over, your mouth is needed" and the guy enough freedom to have a fuck buddy. Let it suffice to say, I don't give this condition of consideration much weight. There is, of course, an introductory period in all relationships. This is when people are figuring out if they like each other. I don't formalize this state with a label, but "under protection" could fit. In this regard (though I disagree with the urge to label it) I respect the relationship. Lastly, a situation I've never seen (But have no doubt exists). A D/s couple in which the s-type is free to do as they please, but cared for, trained, protected by a dominant. This is actually a huge fantasy of mine. I love the idea of having a kitten farm full of little s-types who stem from security I can provide. It would be a dream come true for me. I don't have the means, but the idea of being the stone for girls (particularly troubled ones) intrigues me greatly. It's a daddy dom thing, I think - but I digress... As you can see, the phrase "under consideration" can be stretched to be anything from a formality to excuse booty calls or a beautiful relationship surrounding growth and development. Does the term bother me? No. I just don't consider the label important until I know more.

WyldHrt -> RE: Under Protection???????? (7/31/2009 8:50:47 PM)
I'm with DRH and Steven.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125