BoiJen
Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007 Status: offline
|
TreasureKY, I only read your last link. So this post is in reference to that particular link. The essay goes great lengths to not actually answer the question put forth. At least that's how I experienced the essay. The essay does not address the sudden disappearance of Sodom and Gomorrah or His actual wrath as it pertains to the Egyptian Pharaoh or His reaction/actions in reference to Adam and Eve and their sons (all sons...generations on and on). There is wrath in the sense of anger and hurtful action. Exiling Adam and Eve from paradise on Earth was hurtful and purposeful and not a "natural and logical consequence" as the author of the essay tries to point out. (For those who didn't read, the author referenced the 10 commandments as set of rules to live by in which God does not say "I'll kill you if you don't do these things", rather "your live will be easier if you follow these rules because of the natural and logical consequences that come with violating these rules".) God is all knowing according to the essay. God KNEW Adam was going to eat the apple. God KNEW Eve would be tempted and would cave. If God was a just God (literal interpretation here) why would He even leave the issue of the tree of knowledge? Why leave these things to tempt His "children"? Leave them free will, no problem, but why set them up? It's like leaving a hot pan on the ground next to a toddler and telling the toddler not to touch it cuz it will burn them. It's setting that child up for failure. It's neglect at best and malicious action at worst. And it's incredibly painful spiritually for anyone to struggle with this kind of concept of the God they worship. Not only does this interpretation of God leaving us to "our own devices" fuck us up a little. We're then told, that while we may not get it so bad in this life as a consequence of poor choices, we'll get an eternity of shit storms for it. That's a pretty crappy hand. Now, while I agree with most of the 10 commandments and think they're great guidelines to live by, these are not the only rules we're left with. God's rules don't stop there, if one actually finishes reading the bible. More rules come, they're just not spelled out on a rule sheet like the commandments. And, finally, I want to point out something that really tweaked my butt... "PLEASE NOTE: Satan CANNOT do anything that God does not specifically allow!" I don't get it. I just don't get this statement. According to the essay, Satan is the root of our fuck ups. It's not really us, it's Satan, because Satan manipulates us. By following the above statement from the author, I'm lead to believe that Satan is not "evil" rather is simply a tool God uses so that He can play favorites with us. It just sucks. I can't get past this statement. I really can't. If this can be explained to me in a way the exemplifies the "Loving God" of Christianity, then please do explain it to me, for now the author of the final essay only made a really bad case for literal interpretation and the general acceptance of what Christianity is. boi
_____________________________
Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.
|