VeryMercurial -> RE: BOIZ, LEMME TELL YOU HOW IT'S DONE....THAT TIRED OLD TOPIC, "TRIBUTE"..... (8/23/2009 8:08:29 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NoreenSwan quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamerdreaming quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy Financial domination is a radical departure from a normal, healthy, well-adjusted relationship. Signing too much of one's own life away to one person --- might be a really unbalanced and unwise move to make. In sum, financial domination straddles a thin line between BDSM and exploitation. This is why many ladies are uncomfortable with it, and why many men steer clear of this requirement. What a crock of shit. You would trust a dom with your life, but not your money? [8|] That's fucked up. Great point. Exploitation. Depends on who you ask. If he doesn't feel exploited, is it exploitation? He could feel giving away his money as part of his submission. I find it odd that some say it's okay to submit in this area, but not ok to submit in this area. If a girl sub is expected to have sex with whoever her Dom says, that's a form of exploitation to some people. But to her, giving up her body however her Dom says is a a form of submission, a way to show him she's committed to serving his desires. Who knows, maybe even that exploitation may be what drives her. So many different flavors and likes. I totally agree, your kink may not be my kink, but who are we to judge other people's kinks? It is okay to have sex with 50 men or women because your Dominant orders you to, but it is not okay to give someone $100 to listen to your fantasies? WTF? Who makes the rules and what are they? If someone wants to "serve" me by washing my car, cleaning my home OR giving me cash, that is between the two of us.
|
|
|
|