kdsub
Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kittinSol Who actually declared a war on whom again? The problem with treating terrorists as if they were nations is that their organisations shift, mutate and adapt much faster than nation states. Terrorists are crazy fuckers - and those nations that fund them should be penalised (*follow my gaze*, koff koff). There won't be another 9/11 - there might be another attack (and in my heart, I pray there won't be), but that would only because of the folly of individuals armed to their teeth with hatred (there is no shortage of such people anywhere on the planet). 9/11 doesn't diminish the horror of "non-terroristic" attacks that apparently belong to the world of war... and so, alas, do most wars go: there won't be another Auschwitz. There won't be another Blitz. There won't be another Hiroshima. There won't be another Kosovo. There won't be another Rwanda. None of these events prevent other terrible events from happening. Kant was wrong: humanity does not learn from history. Kitten what you say is true...except there can always be a bigger shock... like New York City uninhabitable for a few thousand years with a dirty bomb. Terrorists have no factories to build weapons… they have few resources for training areas on their own…they have little money without industry…SO We know who are supplying, training, and funding these terrorists and those are the countries that would be at risk in an all out war on terror. It would be hard for terrorists to scare New York city with a few ak-47’s…so we don’t need to catch and kill all the terrorists just take away their weapons and ability to recruit, train, and arm. Butch
_____________________________
Mark Twain: I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing
|