HatesParisHilton -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/22/2009 8:09:05 PM)
|
"So your opinion changes, based on who you are talking to about the subject? " No, more along the lines of "what". as in "what you are", "what you present yourself to be". which is what any selction process, including mating and enforced or rejected racism, is all about. Semiotics and Memetics. You present yourself as someone who may or may not be believed when you claim to have impregnated someone. I don't believe you have, but I don't disbelieve it either. However if you impregnated one of MY female relatives and they wanted to abort for any reason there is no way in hell, no matter "what" you "really are", that you could stop such a rellie of mine from aborting the product of your semen, no matter what you might imagine. Thus with you, it's rather moot. Polite sub, on the other hand, is a different kettle of fish, nd yes, I treat you both ENTIRELY differently. He uses a pic of his own generation (as in self-generated), whereas you employ a shit character from a shit movie. Coming from both a published media BG and as someone who has very destinct experience in what is said by someone appropriating the work of others even for a casual use, this draws a LARGE destinction between you and politesub, and would do so for anyone who'd ever receive both domestic and foreign royalties from companies auch as WB. So no,you AIN'T the same,and no, you DON'T deserve to have the same answer or be perceived in the same way. Like a blogger versus an actual author. "Your ability to state the obvious is impressive, even if slightly flawed. Using your guideline, few of us would be able to have a say on anything." Yes, absolutely, and I'll add fodder for you and FirmKY since you both LOVE the tug and tussle and that's why you are both here. If you are Austrian in your lineage, you can talk smack about the Austro-Hungarian Empire and what that culturally led to and could even make WILD comments about how that affects - eventually, down the line - the Gubernatorial maintenance of CA. I cannot. Or if I want to, what I say will be worth 2% at most of what YOu say. You appear to be of my Father's Generation. My words about that generation mean SHIT ALL compared to yours. If you have been an advertising exec, and have used the work of someone like myself before, then the math changes slightly (RE Pari passu). I have a bit more parity RE my opinion with yours on subjects of manipulating psychological reactions through images, words, fonts, sounds, scents, etc., but your opinion in such a case will still outweigh mine. If you, I and Firm discussed military endeavors, and if none of us SERVED in the military, and Loki 45 (who stated he had served, or at least worked for the military) said we were all completely wrong, we would have to weather that. Our taxes paying his military wage and the budget for his training and equipment would never be equal to the stuff he'd GO through in that training much less the simple physical RISKS of being called up not just for this war, but (depending on his age) the previous one. And yes, it is rather stating the obvious. So was the need to not let parasitic scumsucking bad-mortgage pimps have the rule of the roost but - albeit being obvious - it wasn't acknowledged.
|
|
|
|