RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 2:15:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You're bloviating, Spinner. Obfuscating, too.



Well I'm glad to see you have a good vocabulary. But I still am not going to let go on this point until you answer it. You have stated that you are SURE that if there were a republican politician with racist associations equal to your view of Obama's, there would be riots. There have been three elected officials, two republicans and one democrat who have undeniable associations with undeniably racist organizations.

What you refuse to do is answer the obvious questions.
Are you claiming that membership in the KKK and Strong associations with the CCC do not live up to your view of the racist associations held by Barack Obama?
Do you have any belief that there were riots or any other mass disturbance caused by these associations by these republicans (or the democrat for that matter)?

If the answer to neither of these questions is "yes", then was your assertion about "riots" not wrong as is most of this poor victimized white male nonsense that is being thrown around? I'll make it easier for you. Was not your nonsense about riots wrong. We can talk about this victim mentality that has been adopted at a later date.

Either talk truth or quiet down. But when you speak of nonsense that is so very easily disproved, your one line insult postings are not going to obscure the truth in this matter.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 3:20:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Robert Byrd was a chapter Grand Cyclops and was a member of the clan for about 10 years


Ok.. Grand Cyclops...not Wizard[8|]

If you are from the left, it would appear that you were allowed to be racist in the past like Robert Byrd or like Jimmy Carter was when he ran for Georgia Governor in 1971 but somehow, even a hint of racism true or not, needs to be a death sentence to any politician running from the right.




Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 3:31:33 PM)


You ever stop to think that you might be taking that statement a little too literally, Spinner?

Sometimes you spin so much and so fast that you seem to fall into your own little game.

Just in case you really are having problems understanding the meaning of what I wrote before, allow me to rephrase that previous statement for you, so that it may be easier for you to understand it:

If today a white male Republican president were to do similar things that Obama has done, if he had been in the equivalent of Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years (been in the KKK), if he had had the equivalent to Van Jones (a racist) in his inner circle in the White House, he had appointed a racist like Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, and he had his Justice Department drop charges against a white hate group that had been intimidating BLACK voters outside a polling place somewhere, just like the Obama Justice Department dropped the charges against the Black Panthers for intimidating white voters, shit would hit the fan in the black community.

That better?

And who exactly is throwing around any "poor victimized white male nonsense". Why can't you debate something without building these phony straw men... are you convinced that your arguments are really that weak? What we are arguing is that all racism is wrong. Why is it impossible for you to understand that?


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales
Well I'm glad to see you have a good vocabulary. But I still am not going to let go on this point until you answer it. You have stated that you are SURE that if there were a republican politician with racist associations equal to your view of Obama's, there would be riots. There have been three elected officials, two republicans and one democrat who have undeniable associations with undeniably racist organizations.

What you refuse to do is answer the obvious questions.
Are you claiming that membership in the KKK and Strong associations with the CCC do not live up to your view of the racist associations held by Barack Obama?
Do you have any belief that there were riots or any other mass disturbance caused by these associations by these republicans (or the democrat for that matter)?

If the answer to neither of these questions is "yes", then was your assertion about "riots" not wrong as is most of this poor victimized white male nonsense that is being thrown around? I'll make it easier for you. Was not your nonsense about riots wrong. We can talk about this victim mentality that has been adopted at a later date.

Either talk truth or quiet down. But when you speak of nonsense that is so very easily disproved, your one line insult postings are not going to obscure the truth in this matter.






SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:05:46 PM)

quote:

You ever stop to think that you might be taking that statement far too literally, Spinner?

Sometimes you spin so much and so fast that you seem to fall into your own little game.

And who exactly is throwing around any "poor victimized white male nonsense". Why can't you debate something without building these phony straw men... are your convinced that your arguments are really that weak? ORIGINAL: Sanity


Ahhh...so when you said riots, you didn't mean riots. My mistake. You meant that there would be more of an outrcry against a white politician with racist associations than a black politician with racist associations. So I will ask, yet again, Do you feel that there was an outcry against David Duke, Governor Haley Barbour or Robert Byrd that any way equaled the injured outrage of white conservatives over Barack Obama's associations? Do you feel that Van Jones, & Jehermiah Right are so much more racist than KKK members and anti integrationstis that a comparison between the two of them is unfair to your position? Do you feel that the outcry against the republicans (or the democrats for that matter, and I am thoroughly disgusted by that) was louder than the outcry of the conservatives about Van Jones, Reverend Wright and a judge who made one comment that had been so taken out of context as to be unrecognizable?

You are the one who brought up the matter that black or democratic racism is tolerated while white republican racism is not. This is not a straw man. This is the dead elephant in the room. I'm just bringing it up for discussion.




Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:14:17 PM)


There are always two standards for the left but in reality, or at least in a more perfect world, there is only one.





SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:17:47 PM)

deleted because my )&)&) computer keeps double posting....my apologies




SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:19:39 PM)

quote:

There are always two standards for the left but in reality, or at least in a more perfect world, there is only one. ORIGINAL: Sanity



Sanity, if I gave you a hundred dollar bill for it, you wouldn't answer my questions. When in doubt, change the subject, ignore the questions and blow smoke. I'd call it Alinskyism, but then I'd be sued by another poster on these boards for gimmick  infringement.

I would ask where you see a double standard in my writings, especially when I have made a point, as a point should be made, that the idea that the democratic party has a past Grand Dragon of the KKK in the senate disgusts me as much or more than the fact that the Governor of Mississippi has ties with a racist group that is basically the KKK with snazzier suits. But since you refuse to answer questions about your positions, it doesn't seem very productive.




Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:24:24 PM)


You want someone to jump through your hoops? Get a dog. As an added bonus you can call it a racist and it'll still jump through your hoops all day long.







SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:35:51 PM)

quote:

You want someone to jump through your hoops? Get a dog. As an added bonus you can call it a racist and it'll still jump through your hoops all day long.

But I've got a news flash for you, I'm not a dog - and I'm sure as hell not your dog.
ORIGINAL: Sanity



Is this like your "riot" comment, Sanity, not to be taken seriously? I have never called you a racist. I have never suggested it. I support your right to spout whatever you like whenever you like, but again, I will ask you to back up what you say or suggest you stop saying it.

And you can get as mad as you want over it. Asking you to answer questions about your positions in this venue is not asking you to jump through hoops. It is what this forum is for. I have never and will never fail to answer a direct question about what I have written here. Why is it then inappropriate for me to ask the same of anyone else?

You have presented the fact the Obama's associations show him to be a racist. You have presented the position that if a white person and/or a republican had equally racist associations, the result would be anything from "a riot" to "the shit hitting the fan". I have provided evidence that shows the contrary and asked you to defend your position in light of that evidence. That is not jumping through hoops. That is called discussion.


If you don't like being asked to defend indefensible positions, stop taking indefensible positions.




gift4mistress -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:36:40 PM)

The fact that many of you liberals ignored my last post shows how you on the left are in a deep state of denial.  You don't want to admit that there is racism on both sides, and most of you rebut that the republican party has more of a history fighting racism than the democrats have. [:'(] 




Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 4:59:15 PM)


You can ask general questions all you want but when you begin demanding specific individuals to answer specific questions you're going to see words like "pompous ass" and "Napoleon complex" appearing on your screen, pretty near every time.




SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 5:03:14 PM)

quote:

You can ask general questions all you want but when you begin demanding specific individuals to answer specific questions you're going to see words like "pompous ass" and "Napoleon complex" appearing on your screen, pretty near every time.
ORIGINAL: Sanity



Ahhh...so if I ask a specific individual to answer specific questions about a position he brought up, I should expect evasion and abuse?

How about this: Can you show me that any of my citations are incorrect? Can you show me how any of my questions were unfair to ask? Or shall we all expect the consideration of having everything they say be accepted as truth simply because they say it?




FirmhandKY -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 5:39:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

How about this: Can you show me that any of my citations are incorrect? Can you show me how any of my questions were unfair to ask? Or shall we all expect the consideration of having everything they say be accepted as truth simply because they say it?


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

You mean like the famous riots that occurred when the republican party nominated a man who was elected to the state senate who was a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan in Louisiana?

The Republican party never "nominated" David Duke for anything, that I could find.  Perhaps you have a better source?

In fact, David Duke first ran as a Democrat, then as a Populists, then snuck through as a registered Republican (we can't excommunicate people). You do know how one "registers" as a Democrat or a Republican, don't you?

In fact, the only election which he won as a Republican was in an "open" special election in which he ran against the Republican supported candidate:

In January 1989, Duke ran in a special election open primary for the State House's 81st district seat. Running as Republican Duke finished first in the primary with 3,995 votes for 33.07% [5]. Since no one received over 50% of the vote there was a runoff election with Duke running against fellow Republican John Treen (2,277 votes 18.85% in primary) for a seat representing Metairie in the Louisiana House of Representatives. Despite the endorsement of Treen's candidacy by President George H. W. Bush, former President Ronald Reagan, and other notable Republicans,[20] plus Victor Bussie (head of the Louisiana AFL-CIO and Ed Steimel (head of the Louisiana Association of Business & Industry, the major pro-business lobbyist organization in the state); Duke, however, hammered Treen on a statement the latter had made indicating a willingness to entertain higher property taxes, anathema in that district.[21] Duke with 8,459 votes defeated Treen 8,232 votes (50.68% to 49.32%) [6]. He served in the House from 1990 until 1992.     

If you want to call anyone "racist" in this situation, it's more likely correct to call the 8,459 voting members of the 81st District such - even though I think that point is arguable as well.

Other interesting quotes:

Despite repudiation by the Republican Party[31], Duke ran for Louisiana Governor in 1991 ...

His candidacy was repudiated by the Republicans[37]. Republican Party Chairman Jim Nicholson remarked: "There is no room in the party of Lincoln for a Klansman like David Duke."[37

I don't find any where that the Democratic Party "repudiated" him, especially in the 70's, when he ran as a Democrat, and even won a national primary as a Democrat:

In 1974, David Duke founded the Louisiana-based Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, a Ku Klux Klan group, shortly after graduating from LSU.

In 1979, Duke ran as a Democrat for the 10th district seat in the Louisiana State Senate. He finished second in a three candidate race with 9,897 votes for 26.26%.[18]
In 1988, Duke ran initially in the Democratic presidential primaries. His campaign failed to make much of an impact, with the one notable exemption of winning the little known New Hampshire Vice-Presidential primary [3]

(amazing, isn't it?  I didn't realize how racist New Hampshire Democrats were!! And do you notice the trend, where he gets more votes when he is running as a Democrat, than as a Republican?)

There's plenty more shit, but the point I wish to make is that you (and many other left of center posters) is trying to make is both simplistic, and wrong.

Firm




Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 5:52:09 PM)


You dish out enough abuse that you should expect the exactly the same in return - and I don't take a lot of time to go looking things up weekdays, and I won't ask your forgiveness for that.

I post a little here and there, and that's about it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

Ahhh...so if I ask a specific individual to answer specific questions about a position he brought up, I should expect evasion and abuse?

How about this: Can you show me that any of my citations are incorrect? Can you show me how any of my questions were unfair to ask? Or shall we all expect the consideration of having everything they say be accepted as truth simply because they say it?





SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 5:57:52 PM)

quote:

There's plenty more shit, but the point I wish to make is that you (and many other left of center posters) is trying to make is both simplistic, and wrong.
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY



Hey, when I'm wrong, I'm wrong and I'll admit it. The republicans did have some appropriately disapproving things to say about David Duke. I applaud them just as I condemn the democratic party for tolerating Robert Byrd in their midst.In fact, the idea that any member of the KKK, past or present can be elected to anything is more than a little disgusting.

Haley Barbuor, though, is still pretty egregious on his own. Will you give an equal examination of the facts in that case? I see it as him refusing to ask that his picture be taken down from the CCC website. This picture shows him alongside several of the CCC hierarchy. The CCC, evidenced by it's own statement of purpose, is a racist organization who's ideals, if not methods, are equivilant to the KKK's. Barbour is a republican. Please turn your scrutiny to these facts as you did the others. Again, if I am wrong, I will admit it.

Simplistic thinking goes both ways. And I am not enough a fool to not accept when I have been guilty of it.





SpinnerofTales -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 6:05:02 PM)

quote:

You dish out enough abuse that you should expect the exactly the same in return - and I don't take a lot of time to go looking things up weekdays, and I won't ask your forgiveness for that.

I post a little here and there, and that's about it.
ORIGINAL: Sanity



It seems you have time on this weekday to call names, avoid questions and generally throw out more smoke than a charcoal factory on fire. But you don't have time to answer any questions on your position.

I say again. Your assertion was plainly stated. You said that if a white republican politician had the same level of racism that was, in your mind, shown by Barack Obama, there would be a far greater outcry of public outrage than that shown to President Obama. I have tried to show you that you are incorrect. Why are you taking that as a personal attack? Is it so hard to admit that there is even a possibility, in this individual matter, you were wrong?

I yield the floor. Take your last shot. Have your last word. Unless you are willing to address the issues you raise in a reasonable manner, there is no more to be gained from this conversation.





Sanity -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 6:47:27 PM)

Try this, Spinner. Say, I disagree with you, I don't think that's the case, and then allow the other poster to answer at their leisure if they choose to do so, as opposed to pushing your passive - aggressive BS at me.

How many ways do I have to tell you I'm not playing your game before you finally get it?





Brain -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 7:18:48 PM)

Chuck Norris to American patriots: stop flying U.S. flag or fly one that is 'tea-stained'

Chuck Norris is known for playing good guys with a violent streak. Now as a political commentator he continues to play that role but now he considers America’s choice of Commander in Chief the bad guy. In short he hates the choice voters made and is willing to suggest that a violent overthrow of that choice would be consistent with the Founders’ principles.

http://www.examiner.com/x-5697-Grassroots-Politics-Examiner~y2009m9d21-Chuck-Norris-to-American-patriots-stop-flying-American-flag-or-fly-one-that-is-teastained

I don’t know if this guy is a racist or not but he’s dangerous because for these people it’s all about serving God and they think God’s laws take priority, not the laws of the United States government.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 7:18:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales

You are the one who brought up the matter that black or democratic racism is tolerated while white republican racism is not. This is not a straw man. This is the dead elephant in the room. I'm just bringing it up for discussion.

Jimmy Carter’s Race Problem 

When former president Jimmy Carter accuses the opponents of Barrack Obama’s policy of nationalizing broad aspects of our economy and spending us into bankruptcy of being “racists,” perhaps he should look in the mirror. In his 1982 book, Keeping Faith, Carter disingenuously said he “was not directly involved in the early struggles to end racial discrimination.” No kidding — in fact, he directly and unambiguously supported segregation. When Carter returned to Plains, Georgia, to become a peanut farmer after serving in the Navy, he became a member of the Sumter County School Board, which did not implement the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision handed down by the Supreme Court. Instead, the board continued to segregate school children on the streets of Carter’s hometown.

As Laughlin McDonald, director of the ACLU’s Voting Project, relates in his book A Voting Rights Odyssey: Black Enfranchisement in Georgia, Carter’s board tried to stop the construction of a new “Elementary Negro School” in 1956. Local white citizens had complained that the school would be “too close” to a white school. As a result, “the children, both colored and white, would have to travel the same streets and roads in order to reach their respective schools.” The prospect of black and white children commingling on the streets on their way to school was apparently so horrible to Carter that he requested that the state school board stop construction of the black school until a new site could be found. The state board turned down Carter’s request because of “the staggering cost.” Carter and the rest of the Sumter County School Board then reassured parents at a meeting on October 5, 1956, that the board “would do everything in its power to minimize simultaneous traffic between white and colored students in route to and from school.”
Why isn't Carter considered a racist by the Democrats?

Firm




tazzygirl -> RE: Matthew Norman: The insanity and enduring racism of the American right (9/21/2009 7:23:16 PM)

Im supposed to be upset over something that happened 55 years ago?




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875