RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


sissylaurie -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:41:14 PM)

all i cab say is everyarge new [rpgyam in the ;ast 70 years has been he Denocrats idea's, from Social Security, oemmp[oyment, workmen;s compedstion. the G I Bill etv has been a product of the Semocrats, and has been fough tootth and nail by the Republicans, Juust think what it would be luke without tjhem.




Thadius -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:43:06 PM)

It would be easy to introduce competition into the market, by simply allowing companies to compete across state lines. As of right now many companies have a monopoly or damn close to it in many markets, be it from regulation or the costs to get licensed in each and every state. I honestly believe that this one little thing would do alot to bring down the premium prices.

I do agree with you about the way insurance companies make their profits, and or maximize them. There are plenty of ways to regulate or legislate protections for people. Hell I wouldn't even mind seeing some sort of income based scale for maximum premiums a person could be charged, even with "pre-existing" conditions. I guess what I am saying is there are plenty of ways to improve the current system, without spending a trillion dollars to get a new program started. Speaking of which, if there are $400 - $500 Billion in savings to be had in the current Medicare and Medicaid systems, why the hell aren't we doing it now? Why do we need a new bill to do what is fiscally responsible?




sissylaurie -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:45:54 PM)

i am srry about the typo's but my speech recognition program is wacky to-nite and i cant tyope with out it. Noo manual deterity due to a physical problem




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:52:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissylaurie

i am srry about the typo's but my speech recognition program is wacky to-nite and i cant tyope with out it. Noo manual deterity due to a physical problem



Hey, no problem. It took a few extra seconds to work through it, but we can all stand to learn a little patience! Good luck with the speech recognition software.




sissylaurie -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:55:58 PM)

Bush put us in debt 50 billion over a war we never should have been in. 6 month's after we lrave they will be at each tjers throat again. They have been for a 1000 ytars. hat makes us thik they will stop now?




tazzygirl -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 6:56:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Those who live in Canada and post here have already voiced their opinions on the efficiency of their health care.... point blank.. for them.. it works a hell of alot better than ours does here. And part of the problem with our health care isnt the care we receive.. its the denial of access! Or are you so caught up in the politics that you cant see that?

quote:

He's put us into more debt in the short time he's been in office than Bush did in eight years. He did that bailing out companies that should have been left to sink or swim.


I have posted on this as well. In the 8 years of Bush, between stimulus and Tarp, he costs the country over 1 trillion. Bush started some of the "capitalism" you are complaining about. I dont blame him, its just what had to happen to prevent our contry from financially going under. But, if you are going to complain that Obama was the cause, the one who implemented alot of that, then i have to call you on your bs.


The Canadian Prime Minister himself was on national TV talking about how the Canadian healthcare system was imploding and they had to do something soon. They don't like our system, but they can't support their own anymore either. I guess you'll deny that because I don't have a link - I just pay attention to the news. Right now they send patients to the US on a regular basis that can't be handled there. Where are they going to send them when we're in the same boat? Sounds to me like THEY are the ones being denied access. Even when my daughter had no insurance at all, she was always able to receive healthcare at one of the local hospitals if she needed it. Access is not the problem in America, cost is. There are polls being taken all the time (watch the news once in a while!) where people say they are basically happy with what we have but just want help bringing the cost down.


And if what you say is true, im sure Arpig, Lucy or one of the others will step in and say so. LOL.. and compared to the alternative.. which is NO insurance, many are happy. How happy are you that you are helping to pay MY health care bills each and every year, not only through taxes, but also your policy rates, assuming you have insurance, as well as the increased cost for Dr visits, hospital stays, ect.

quote:


In your rush to condemn me (no suprise there), you misunderstood what I said. What I actually said was that letting companies sink or swim was just capitalism. I then went on to say that was what scared people - that Obama would not allow this to happen. Poor wording on my part perhaps but correct in what I said.


If its poor wording on your part, its not my misunderstanding, now is it. As far as condemning you, i didnt. I condemned what you said. Huge difference.

quote:


There ARE extensive waits in the UK and Canada for health care. I don't know who's been posting here, but perhaps they don't know any better because that's all they know. No, they don't wait 12 months for cancer surgery, but their waits most defenitely are far longer than ours.



I had to wait 6 weeks for my knee surgery. About the equivelent someone else had to wait in Canada from another poster. Depending on where we live in the US, our waits can be long or short. Emergent care is never made to wait, neither here nor there.

quote:



A link to prove what they're doing with the healthcare plan now? You people LOVE your links. Kinda like Obama - keeps you from having to think on your own. Just pull up a few links, post them, and scream to all who will listen that it's true, it's true! I'm not going to post any personal figures out here, but we pay a hell of a lot less than 10% of our annual salary for our insurance. You people really believe you're going to get totally FREE healthcare? How old are you? Nothing is free, especially if the government is involved. Medicaid will be broke in approximately 8 years and we haven't even fixed THAT yet. The money for startup of this new healthcare plan alone will be one hell of a tax.


Again, you are already being taxed for those who have no insurance. And gouged. And, guess what? Here is a novel idea? People who have access have better health! ~gasps~ unbelievable huh?

As far as free... no one wants a free ride.. especially me. I do want insurance i can afford that will pay for preventative care. Something beyond the sick day care of starbridge that most employers of lower wage jobs offer.
quote:



What's gone wrong with Obama's policies? Where do I start? The first thing he did when he got in office was spend a trillion dollars to bail out companies who should never have been helped, but were big supporters during his campaign. His foreign policies are a bad joke. He snubbed the Queen of England while giving her an embarrassingly inappropriate gift. Then off to the Middle East where he bowed to one of their leaders.(Again, watch your news. It was right there for all to see.) He is going around the world apologizing for things we've done. Well, I don't feel like we need to apologize for anything and I resent him acting like we do. Unemployment rates are hanging around 8-10% with no end in sight. The current administration has actually said that we need to spend our way out of this situation! When you're out of money, the last thing you do is go out and spend. It's just common sense. On the personal side, you may think it's sweet that he takes his family everywhere he goes, but I don't happen to enjoy spending my tax money for his family to tag along on Air Force One. There are extravagant parties held in the Whitehouse every week. I spoke personally to someone attending one of those parties. Her mother got a small business award, so her entire family was being flown to Washington for the party. She had been shopping all day for the evening gowns she needed for all the different parties. Wow. My tax dollars at work - again.



The underline is mine. Which companies? Second underline is also mine. You honestly think its costs more to squeeze 4 extra people onto Air Force One? your kidding, right?

As far as the mother... do you have any proof government tax dollars are being spent on her? Or could it be possibly that their own money is being spent? Often things the more conservatives complain about it things they know nothing about. Even guests on Air Force One get a bill for their meals.

quote:



Obama put us a trillion dollars in debt just since he got into office. Yes, Bush spent approximately the same amount while he was in, but the economy was in far better shape and it took him EIGHT YEARS to do it. He also had a democratic congress at the time and they are the ones who hold the purse strings. They're still holding them and once we got a democratic president in office, the money just poured out like never before. Now we're printing it like monopoly money.



Again, if your not too afraid to break a nail typing... who did he spend a trillion dollars on?

quote:



I don't care how Maher worded it, it boiled down to the same thing. While America was still grieving for all the innocent people killed in 9/11, he thought he could get away with a totally insensitive and inappropriate remark. If it had been Glenn Beck (since someone mentioned him) who had made the remark, the outcry would have been 3 times as loud. The media wouldn't have stopped until he was crying and begging for mercy.



And i agreed with Maher.... they were many things, those people who crashed their planes... but they were not cowards.

quote:



Yes, Bush went into Iraq after the bombing, but he did it after he had time to cool down and look over the situation. If he had done nothing, what kind of message would that have sent? Obama is in charge now and we are still there. The difference is I doubt if he knows his enemy and he is taking so long to make decisions that he's putting our troops in far greater danger than Bush did.

It's obvious that you've already had a sip of the kool-aid, so I won't bother to pursue this any further. I'll leave you with one quote from Magaret Thatcher (Go ahead- look it up): The only bad thing about socialsim is sooner or later you run out of other people's money.

Happy Shredding,

Mistress Scarlet






Ah dear miss scarlet... i didnt expect you to stay around in the deep end of the pool. [:D]




MstrssScarlet -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:02:07 PM)

"Ah dear miss scarlet... i didnt expect you to stay around in the deep end of the pool"

Why should I? What's my incentive? You're obviously an Obama fan (as most people on this site are) who will never in a million years believe that anything he does is wrong and anyone that disagrees with you is simply on a rant. Even your questions show how ignorant about the issues you are. You don't know where that trillion dollars went? Wow. Unbelievable. Does AIG ring a bell? Look it up. I'm not wasting my time teaching you current history events. Apparently you have your own online "experts" and no one else could POSSIBLY have anything else to say that could be accurate. Sheeesh!

Mistress Scarlet




MstrssScarlet -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:12:12 PM)

"compared to the alternative.. which is NO insurance, many are happy. How happy are you that you are helping to pay MY health care bills each and every year, not only through taxes, but also your policy rates, assuming you have insurance, as well as the increased cost for Dr visits, hospital stays, ect."

Well, pretty soon we'll ALL be paying and maybe that will finally make you happy. Right now I don't have a problem with what I'm paying, but we'll overhaul the entire system just for people like you.

Mistress Scarlet




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:30:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet



There ARE extensive waits in the UK and Canada for health care. I don't know who's been posting here, but perhaps they don't know any better because that's all they know. No, they don't wait 12 months for cancer surgery, but their waits most defenitely are far longer than ours.


You do realize, don't you, that some of the people who are telling you you're wrong are people who actually live in those countries? Do you think they're lying, or do you suppose that maybe - just maybe - they actually know more about the countries they live in than you do?


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
A link to prove what they're doing with the healthcare plan now? You people LOVE your links. Kinda like Obama - keeps you from having to think on your own.


Uh.... let me get this straight... we're asking you to provide some proof to back up the claims you're making, and you say that just shows that we don't know how to think on our own? Do you seriously not see what a completely silly argument that is?


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
Just pull up a few links, post them, and scream to all who will listen that it's true, it's true! I'm not going to post any personal figures out here, but we pay a hell of a lot less than 10% of our annual salary for our insurance. You people really believe you're going to get totally FREE healthcare?


WTF? Who in the world ever said that? Can you name just one poster here who said we think we're going to get free health care? And if not, then why in the world are you even bringing it up? Maybe you should try to win just one argument against the things we are saying before you move on to arguing with things nobody said. Because so far, you haven't won a single real argument. I don't see where you have the time to start trying to win imaginary ones.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
He snubbed the Queen of England while giving her an embarrassingly inappropriate gift. Then off to the Middle East where he bowed to one of their leaders.(Again, watch your news. It was right there for all to see.)


Were you just as angry at the two Presidents Bush when they bowed to the Prime Minister of Japan?



quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
Yes, Bush went into Iraq after the bombing, but he did it after he had time to cool down and look over the situation.


Another completely upside-down argument. If he took the time to  think things through, then don't you think it makes him look even worse when he still made the wrong decision?


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
If he had done nothing, what kind of message would that have sent?


So those were his only two options? Invade a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, or do nothing at all? I didn't realize Cheney  only gave him the two choices.

But let me turn the question back at you - what kind of a message do you think it sends to invade a country that didn't attack us? Do you seriously think that shows strength - when someone attacks us, we invade somebody who had nothing at all to do with it so that we look strong? And you're the one accusing us of making children's arguments?

Look, believe it or not I agree with a lot of your positions. And I respect your political point of view. But what you have to understand is, if you're going to come in here and debate, you have to bring some facts to back up your positions. And I don't recall ever seeing you actually support a single one of your assertions. Maybe you did once or twice and I missed it, but all I recall seeing from you is reciting a long list of talking points from right wing radio shows, with no facts to back any of it up, and then getting pissy when we point out that you don't have any idea what you're talking about.

You don't bring anything to the discussion but bullshit made up by Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. If you want to swallow it hook, line, and sinker without making any effort to find out whether it's true or not, be our guest. But please don't be pissed at us if we ask for a little proof.








Kirata -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:36:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

they were many things, those people who crashed their planes... but they were not cowards.

They were zealots seeking the rewards of a martyr's death, not courageous men who chose to face a death they neither wished for nor welcomed.

K.






tazzygirl -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:50:11 PM)

i never said they were not idiots, Master Kirata... i just agreed they werent cowards.




Thadius -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 8:56:21 PM)

tazzy,

Some might argue that they were cowards, for not facing an enemy that could fight back... or for taking their war to civilians... The one thing I would give them credit for is having enough faith (or being brainwashed enough) to see the plan through to whatever end.

I can understand how some could argue the opposing view; that they had courage to "sacrifice" themselves for their cause. It is just not a position that I can agree is accurate.

I wish you well,
Thadius




tazzygirl -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:01:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet

"Ah dear miss scarlet... i didnt expect you to stay around in the deep end of the pool"

Why should I? What's my incentive? You're obviously an Obama fan (as most people on this site are) who will never in a million years believe that anything he does is wrong and anyone that disagrees with you is simply on a rant. Even your questions show how ignorant about the issues you are. You don't know where that trillion dollars went? Wow. Unbelievable. Does AIG ring a bell? Look it up. I'm not wasting my time teaching you current history events. Apparently you have your own online "experts" and no one else could POSSIBLY have anything else to say that could be accurate. Sheeesh!

Mistress Scarlet


AIG was given the money in september 2008... Obama took office in 2009. Gee... he sure had some political power before he became President, huh.

Hardly. AIG and the other banks received their money before Obama took office. Perhaps some research might help your argument.

quote:

the AIG bailout was engineered by the Federal Reserve and the Bush administration in September of last year, weeks before Obama was elected.


http://www.factcheck.org/2009/03/aig-campaign-donations/

Am i an Obama fan? Yes... i also have stated many times that i am not one with blinders on. Come to me with facts, and i accept the facts. Come to me with opinions, and the opinions of others, and those i may question.

Now that i am finished doing your research on this topic... have any others you wish for me to debunk?


quote:

"compared to the alternative.. which is NO insurance, many are happy. How happy are you that you are helping to pay MY health care bills each and every year, not only through taxes, but also your policy rates, assuming you have insurance, as well as the increased cost for Dr visits, hospital stays, ect."

Well, pretty soon we'll ALL be paying and maybe that will finally make you happy. Right now I don't have a problem with what I'm paying, but we'll overhaul the entire system just for people like you.

Mistress Scarlet


LOL... for people like me... how cute! Your paying for many people like me, which should outrage you. instead you are just happy as things are going... until when... until you lose your job? until they price you out of your insurance? until you develop cancer and they find out you didnt tell them about that sinus condition you had 9 years ago and they drop you? Do you even know that being an abused woman with a documented history can be considered a pre-existing condition and they can drop you for not revealing that?

How much of your life are you going to sit back and be happy that they are controlling?




tazzygirl -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:03:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

tazzy,

Some might argue that they were cowards, for not facing an enemy that could fight back... or for taking their war to civilians... The one thing I would give them credit for is having enough faith (or being brainwashed enough) to see the plan through to whatever end.

I can understand how some could argue the opposing view; that they had courage to "sacrifice" themselves for their cause. It is just not a position that I can agree is accurate.

I wish you well,
Thadius



Hi Master

i would agree more with the brain washing than i would the "courage". and i would lable those who sent them as cowards for not being "courageous" to do the deed themselves. but, to me, to call the men flying those planes cowards doesnt fit right... idiots... zealots... mindless... bastards... all those things and more... but.. cowards... i cant see.




Thadius -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:05:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

tazzy,

Some might argue that they were cowards, for not facing an enemy that could fight back... or for taking their war to civilians... The one thing I would give them credit for is having enough faith (or being brainwashed enough) to see the plan through to whatever end.

I can understand how some could argue the opposing view; that they had courage to "sacrifice" themselves for their cause. It is just not a position that I can agree is accurate.

I wish you well,
Thadius



Hi Master

i would agree more with the brain washing than i would the "courage". and i would lable those who sent them as cowards for not being "courageous" to do the deed themselves. but, to me, to call the men flying those planes cowards doesnt fit right... idiots... zealots... mindless... bastards... all those things and more... but.. cowards... i cant see.

I can agree with everything you state here.




rulemylife -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:19:56 PM)

I can't believe I'm actually bothering to address the unbelievable amount of inaccuracies in your post, but I guess I'm bored.

But I do have to ask a general question to no one in particular.  Why is it so many conservative posters on here will post endless tirades with no factual reference and then claim there is no need for citations because "those are the facts and everyone knows them"?


quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet

The Canadian Prime Minister himself was on national TV talking about how the Canadian healthcare system was imploding and they had to do something soon. They don't like our system, but they can't support their own anymore either. I guess you'll deny that because I don't have a link - I just pay attention to the news.


Since you pay so much attention it should be no problem for you to find a link so we can all see exactly what he said instead of relying on your interpretation.

quote:

Right now they send patients to the US on a regular basis that can't be handled there. Where are they going to send them when we're in the same boat? Sounds to me like THEY are the ones being denied access.


And you have some facts to support this I assume.

quote:

Even when my daughter had no insurance at all, she was always able to receive healthcare at one of the local hospitals if she needed it. Access is not the problem in America, cost is. There are polls being taken all the time (watch the news once in a while!) where people say they are basically happy with what we have but just want help bringing the cost down.


So, you or your daughter then made payment arrangements out-of-pocket?

Or did it become the "free healthcare" you talk about later in your rant?

Because you do understand part of the reason for the high costs are people who are responsible enough to carry their own insurance are paying for those like your daughter who "had no insurance at all, she was always able to receive healthcare at one of the local hospitals if she needed it". 

quote:

In your rush to condemn me (no suprise there), you misunderstood what I said. What I actually said was that letting companies sink or swim was just capitalism. I then went on to say that was what scared people - that Obama would not allow this to happen. Poor wording on my part perhaps but correct in what I said.


The AIG and bank bailouts occurred under Bush and he also set things in motion for the auto industry bailout.

quote:

There ARE extensive waits in the UK and Canada for health care. I don't know who's been posting here, but perhaps they don't know any better because that's all they know. No, they don't wait 12 months for cancer surgery, but their waits most defenitely are far longer than ours.


Those who have been posting here are those who live in the UK and Canada and they seem to know better about our system then you apparently know about theirs.

Perhaps it is you that doesn't know any better because this is all you know and all you've heard is from those who are opposed to single-payer but actually have no first-hand knowledge of those systems in other countries.

quote:

A link to prove what they're doing with the healthcare plan now? You people LOVE your links. Kinda like Obama - keeps you from having to think on your own.


And how you do you think on your own when you cannot back what you are saying with facts?

Does thinking on your own mean you are just spitting out whatever opinion pops into your head with no reasonable factual basis?

quote:

Just pull up a few links, post them, and scream to all who will listen that it's true, it's true! I'm not going to post any personal figures out here, but we pay a hell of a lot less than 10% of our annual salary for our insurance.


You're right.  Much better to scream to all who will listen that your facts are correct because, well........after all, you said they were.

quote:

You people really believe you're going to get totally FREE healthcare? How old are you? Nothing is free, especially if the government is involved


Which brings us back to "Even when my daughter had no insurance at all, she was always able to receive healthcare at one of the local hospitals if she needed it".

quote:

Medicaid will be broke in approximately 8 years and we haven't even fixed THAT yet. The money for startup of this new healthcare plan alone will be one hell of a tax.


I guess more things we all know to be true.

I can even live without the factual data if you present a reasoned argument, but all you are doing is ranting.

quote:

What's gone wrong with Obama's policies? Where do I start? The first thing he did when he got in office was spend a trillion dollars to bail out companies who should never have been helped, but were big supporters during his campaign.


It's actually astounding to see so much misinformation in one sentence.

The only thing that can be attributed to Obama is the stimulus package, which was designed to be spent over a multi-year period and only a small portion has been spent so far.

It had nothing to do with helping any specific company.

The bailout of GM and Chrysler was initiated by Bush out of TARP funds after Congress refused to provide separate funding.  Obama only continued the policy and provided additional funding.




quote:

On the personal side, you may think it's sweet that he takes his family everywhere he goes, but I don't happen to enjoy spending my tax money for his family to tag along on Air Force One.


Sooooo.........do you mean that we taxpayers get charged extra airfare from Air Force One Airlines when his family travels with him as opposed to him traveling alone?

quote:

There are extravagant parties held in the Whitehouse every week. I spoke personally to someone attending one of those parties. Her mother got a small business award, so her entire family was being flown to Washington for the party. She had been shopping all day for the evening gowns she needed for all the different parties. Wow. My tax dollars at work - again.


Wow, that Obama is just one party animal!

quote:

Obama put us a trillion dollars in debt just since he got into office. Yes, Bush spent approximately the same amount while he was in, but the economy was in far better shape and it took him EIGHT YEARS to do it.


Nope, wrong yet again.  But don't stop now, you're on a roll.

PolitiFact | $5 trillion added to national debt under Bush
When Bush took office, the national debt was $5.73 trillion. When he left, it was $10.7 trillion. That's a difference of $4.97 trillion...

quote:


He also had a democratic congress at the time and they are the ones who hold the purse strings.


Bush had a Republican Congress for his first six years in office.


quote:

Yes, Bush went into Iraq after the bombing, but he did it after he had time to cool down and look over the situation. If he had done nothing, what kind of message would that have sent? Obama is in charge now and we are still there. The difference is I doubt if he knows his enemy and he is taking so long to make decisions that he's putting our troops in far greater danger than Bush did.


So, on one hand you are complimenting Bush for taking time to analyze the situation and then, in the next breath, criticizing Obama for doing the same.






tazzygirl -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:26:59 PM)

He spent a bit more than that, rule.

http://www.mercatus.org/PublicationDetails.aspx?id=26426

Most sources im finding talk of figures around 10 billion or more for his 8 years in office.




Thadius -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:32:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

He spent a bit more than that, rule.

http://www.mercatus.org/PublicationDetails.aspx?id=26426

Most sources im finding talk of figures around 10 billion or more for his 8 years in office.

Thanks for the source... interesting tables there. I did notice something looking at those numbers that kinda jumped out at me... the huge increase in entitlement spending between 2008 and 2009 (almost $900 billion). I wonder if the bailouts are included under the "entitlements" category.




SpinnerofTales -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:34:16 PM)

quote:


All quotes are from MstrssScarlet
His foreign policies are a bad joke. He snubbed the Queen of England while giving her an embarrassingly inappropriate gift. Then off to the Middle East where he bowed to one of their leaders.(Again, watch your news. It was right there for all to see.) He is going around the world apologizing for things we've done. Well, I don't feel like we need to apologize for anything and I resent him acting like we do.

The president did not bow to anyone. He went to shake hands with a man who was about a foot shorter than he was. It was a case of bend over or pull the foreign leader's hand up more than politeness dictates. I know that we got used to a president who thought rudeness a virtue, but let's not turn politeness into anything more. As for America not having anything to apologize for? I would say lying to the world about WMD and trying to join us in attacking a country that had not attacked us in any way is one thing to apologize for. Becoming a nation that routinely tortured people, often with little or no evidence that they had anything to do with terrorism is another. A general "If you don't do what we say, fuck you" diplomatic agenda is another. Mending fences is not necessarily a bad thing. Let's keep in mind there is a huge difference between "My country right or wrong" and "My country is always right"

quote:

Unemployment rates are hanging around 8-10% with no end in sight. The current administration has actually said that we need to spend our way out of this situation! When you're out of money, the last thing you do is go out and spend. It's just common sense. On the personal side, you may think it's sweet that he takes his family everywhere he goes, but I don't happen to enjoy spending my tax money for his family to tag along on Air Force One. There are extravagant parties held in the Whitehouse every week. I spoke personally to someone attending one of those parties. Her mother got a small business award, so her entire family was being flown to Washington for the party. She had been shopping all day for the evening gowns she needed for all the different parties. Wow. My tax dollars at work - again.


Economists were predicting that unemployment would rise long before Obama was elected. They also said it likely wouldn't come even start coming down until late 2010. As for the "extravagant parties", I have heard nothing about the current administration spending more on travel, entertainment or any other associated expense than previous administrations. Of course, any excuse to lambaste the president is a good one, especially when you don't have to worry about pesky things like citing sources for your assertions.  


quote:

I don't care how Maher worded it, it boiled down to the same thing. While America was still grieving for all the innocent people killed in 9/11, he thought he could get away with a totally insensitive and inappropriate remark. If it had been Glenn Beck (since someone mentioned him) who had made the remark, the outcry would have been 3 times as loud. The media wouldn't have stopped until he was crying and begging for mercy.


Why do so many right leaning posters feel that they have to point out their idea that the left gets better treatment, more media attention than the left? If it had been Beck or Limbaugh, the comment probably would have gotten the same treatment. Let us try to keep the "right as victim" conversation to a minimum if we can.

quote:

Yes, Bush went into Iraq after the bombing, but he did it after he had time to cool down and look over the situation. If he had done nothing, what kind of message would that have sent? Obama is in charge now and we are still there. The difference is I doubt if he knows his enemy and he is taking so long to make decisions that he's putting our troops in far greater danger than Bush did.


So Bush took some time, thought things over and decided either to lie or manifest his gross incompetence. He and his administration swore that there was proof that Sadam had weapons of mass destruction. There were none. He told the country that this would be a three month, three billion dollar effort. And shall we all forget his famous "Mission accomplished" speech. (I do note that I don't see much written these days about the wasted money of having the president fly a fighter jet onto the deck of an aircraft carrier for a photo op, btw).

What impression would he make on the world if he hadn't attacked Iraq? How about that we were a country that didn't lie to the world and attack countries that we had no business attacking? Maybe that we were people who were serious about stopping terrorism rather than a bunch of cowboys looking for someone to shoot? I would have kind of liked that message sent.

quote:

It's obvious that you've already had a sip of the kool-aid, so I won't bother to pursue this any further. I'll leave you with one quote from Magaret Thatcher (Go ahead- look it up): The only bad thing about socialsim is sooner or later you run out of other people's money.


I'm always amazed by the fact that everyone who agrees with me is an educated, clear thinker while those who disagree with me are just mindless, silly sheep buying the lies that they are being fed....drinking the kool-aid as it were. I see that you've discovered the same thing.




thornhappy -> RE: The crazies are coming out of the and they have radio to support them (10/10/2009 9:35:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrssScarlet
Even when my daughter had no insurance at all, she was always able to receive healthcare at one of the local hospitals if she needed it. Access is not the problem in America, cost is.

How much did she pay for that medical care - I bet she paid through the nose.  ERs are not for "I left this go way too long" or "this is something straightforward but I can't find a doctor who'll treat me without me paying up front."  You can bankrupt the hospital, along with the non-insured patients, that way.

I had some tricky neurosurgery back in 2001.  If I didn't have insurance, I would've been out over $20,000; instead I paid about $1000, including all fees.  I was a student at the time, and lucky enough to be on COBRA.

thornhappy




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875