lovingpet
Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero The whole crux of this is interpretation, isn't it? Nevermind having to balance if there is appreciation being given in the first place, but having (if you genuinely care in an objective fashion) to determine if there are different 'currencies' of appreciation at play in a relationship. I don't know that this is really what I am look at though. I am not so much interested in if people feel they are appreciated within their relationships, though that has been a major thrust in this thread so far, but whether or not they want to be appreciated at all, in some areas and not others, or in all things in some fashion. The manner of expression is not really of all that much importance to me. Modes of expression are as varied as there are people. My own example in this thread shows a range of expressions from a mere two people. quote:
I this much of this comes down to the authority dynamic. I find, in my own view, that this is why being on the submissive side of things requires a genuine natural propensity to serve and be subservient. That will dictate the appreciation. I've seen words of subs/slaves on here that indicate that just being able to be allowed to perform a service for their D-type is appreciation enough. As an s-type, if your motivation is actually serving, there is a heavy introspective responsibility, I think, to determine if you are measuring every instance of action/reaction in the dynamic by your measuring stick or the D-types because, ideally, the D-types appraisal is what is supposed to motivate you. I understand this and it is what brought this question to mind in the first place. A submissive person will do many things without thought of it being anything special until it is treated as such. It wasn't the expression of appreciation he/she wanted. It was to be, do, or provide those services in the first place. That is what made my particular example poignant for me. I wanted to do what it just seemed natural to want to do for my partner. In the same breath, he denied me permission to do it (for appropriate and necessary reasons to my benefit) and yet thanked me for wanting to do them. I never needed those words and certainly didn't want them for having actually done absolutely nothing, but he bestowed them and I accepted them as gracefully as I could manage. I think in honoring his expression that was taking his measure over my own. quote:
Not so say that all instances of feeling unappreciated will necessarily be bad, but I often see too much of this emotional quid pro quo belying what should be the natural cyclic process of subservience/leadership. No, I have no interest in any sort of tit for tat trade personally. If folks are looking for equitable exchange and validation, this is likely not the best relationship for them. It is a giving everything on one side and a taking everything on the other. The times when these reverse are precious in and of themselves, but are so because they go against the grain of the natural flow, so they make a bit of a wave. Waves tend to have a great power to knock people off their feet. lovingpet
_____________________________
If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me 10 Fluffy pts.
|