RE: Nick Griffin - torn to shreds on QT?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Nick Griffin - torn to shreds on QT?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Nick Griffin - torn to shreds on QT?

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 6 [7]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Nick Griffin - torn to shreds on QT? - 10/27/2009 11:03:31 AM

SL4V3M4YB3

Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline

They haven’t changed at all perhaps the only way they have is in terms of political acumen: they will attract greens through ridiculous green policies that they know they'll never impose. Just an attempt to make them look like something other than a single issue party.

Behind closed doors they act the same as they always have, ask any journalist that has done hidden camera reports on their meetings. Do you forget those reports about how they interpret Islam? You can say all you like about political freedom but the reality is we don’t let people stand to represent those that want to conduct illegal activities such as shoplifting so why should such a distinction be made to allow those that want to break laws regarding racial and religious hatred stand?

There are laws to deal with these people in terms of how they act on their website (see what news they focus on there and ask yourself how it isn't inciting religious hatred.) but they are not being enforced because nobody wants to be accused of restricting political freedom.

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 10/27/2009 11:16:48 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Starbuck09)

Profile

Post #: 121

RE: Nick Griffin - torn to shreds on QT? - 10/27/2009 11:42:15 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Starbuck09

Which is precisely why the Question time episode was an utter disaster. They have plenty of policies. None were debated. Therefore those who loathe the B.N.P. were affirmed in their opinion whereas those who support them or are waivering simply saw the B.N.P. unfairly treated. Convincing those who despise the B.N.P. not to vote for them is pointless. What is needed is to convince those who do not view them that way and the farce of that debate [I have never seen a representative of a political party treated in such a manner on that show] will absolutely not do that. Like all of the attempts to combat the B.N.P. so far this was pitiful, embarrasing and terribly damaging.

They have four council seats in Stoke and nobody there has been able to muster anything even approaching a policy statement. They seem a lot more interested in whining.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Starbuck09)

Profile

Post #: 122