RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

RacerJim -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 6:37:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales quote: Rush must be the envy of progressives everywhere. Not only is he the most listened to radio host ever but I'm pretty sure there are more threads started about him here than anyone, including Barack Obama. Obama even feels so threatened by Rush Limbaugh that he's taking Rush on directly. 'Ol Rush Limbaugh must have something going for him. All thats's awfully good, for an imbecile! ORIGINAL: Sanity I know I am jealous as hell over Rush. I wish we liberals had a voice that was so completely uninterested in truth, integrity or dignity. Of course, then we'd have to find a way to make the liberals as gullible as the conservatives who actually believe in what Rush says, so I suppose it wouldn't work anyway. You liberals do in fact have a voice that has always been completely, totally and utterly uninterested in truth, integrity or dignity and every other positive charactor trait...Barack Hussein Obama aka Barack Obama aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro. Of course, then you'd have to find a way to admit to being so friggin' gullible as to actually believe anything Obama says anymore which, of course, is a false hope in and of itself.

thishereboi -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 6:44:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RacerJim quote: ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales quote: Rush must be the envy of progressives everywhere. Not only is he the most listened to radio host ever but I'm pretty sure there are more threads started about him here than anyone, including Barack Obama. Obama even feels so threatened by Rush Limbaugh that he's taking Rush on directly. 'Ol Rush Limbaugh must have something going for him. All thats's awfully good, for an imbecile! ORIGINAL: Sanity I know I am jealous as hell over Rush. I wish we liberals had a voice that was so completely uninterested in truth, integrity or dignity. Of course, then we'd have to find a way to make the liberals as gullible as the conservatives who actually believe in what Rush says, so I suppose it wouldn't work anyway. You liberals do in fact have a voice that has always been completely, totally and utterly uninterested in truth, integrity or dignity and every other positive charactor trait...Barack Hussein Obama aka Barack Obama aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro. Of course, then you'd have to find a way to admit to being so friggin' gullible as to actually believe anything Obama says anymore which, of course, is a false hope in and of itself. Ha, ha, oh that is so cute....wait your serious. Sorry for a minute I thought it was a joke and I was waiting for the punchline, let me try this again. Ok, nice post but I am confused....Was this supposed to make me think less of Obama or less of you, because I have to say Barak looks about the same to me as he did before. You on the other hand.......Yea maybe you should go stand with ron and mars and kittin. You remind me a lot of them.

Louve00 -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 6:51:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rikigrl quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse One thing is for sure. Rush doesn't have to depend on federal tax payer money to stay on the air. Much unlike PSB. PBS?? LOL I thought the same thing.

rikigrl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 11:12:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Louve00 quote: ORIGINAL: rikigrl quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse One thing is for sure. Rush doesn't have to depend on federal tax payer money to stay on the air. Much unlike PSB. PBS?? LOL I thought the same thing. i wasn't sure if it was a typo or if PSB was an acronym for a new left wing indoctrination program like...umm..Pre-School Brunches (with the prez on video feed) or...President-Student Briefings mebbe.[;)]

mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 11:29:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg So basically you were making a bold faced knowing lie, Mnot. Its ok, we are used to it from you Why do so many of the left have to lie like Mnot does?... why do you post against rule and villify me in vague terms? it is not like you have some point that is worth dignifying. I know for a fact you are a homosexual who lives in filthy airports and sucks shit outta toilet bowls, and pay extra if it is a liberal shit. now why do you want to lie about it, why don't you come clean, why do you pretend you don't? don't be a total dumbass. get some self-respect for fuck sake. Ron Yea talk about respect...you have lost any you ever had from me. Your posts lately are pathetic whines and worthy only of being reported then ignored. edited to add: ok take back the report part, I tried but someone else beat me to it. The point was that all he ever says is LIE, PRETEND ......never citing or backing up the actual arguments he makes... Well he was given a chance to refute, you know, because thats how they want us to do it, refute silly arguments with cite upon cite which they then say are invalid........ And insofar as respect? I'm not going to lose any sleep about it. Too bad really, but it is what it is. Ron

CreativeDominant -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 12:09:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I do, he made the apology (along those lines) on the nightly news. you prolly didn't (and still don't) watch that channel, is all. Ron Actually Ron, I believe what he said...after weeks...was that he considered the source to be unsatisfactory. But he stood by the "truth" of the story, much the same way Rush did...and I don't like that from either side. There is plenty of "truth" out there...quote it and stand by it...don't stand by questionable sources and "make it better" by saying "we all know its the truth/he thinks like that". As for not watching the network, you are right in terms of the news presented...Katie Couric is, if possible, more overtly biased than Rather ever was.

mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 12:26:06 PM)
And CreativeDominant, I am with you all the way, everything you said, and what's good for the goose is good for the gander, bounce Rushes ass off and maybe he will understand due diligence. Ron

kittinSol -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 12:30:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Yea maybe you should go stand with ron and mars and kittin. You remind me a lot of them. I can think of far worse places to be, so kudos to you for recognising quality people when you encounter them.

Louve00 -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 12:59:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rikigrl i wasn't sure if it was a typo or if PSB was an acronym for a new left wing indoctrination program like...umm..Pre-School Brunches (with the prez on video feed) or...President-Student Briefings mebbe.[;)] I took it pretty much as it read. Didn't understand it, but wasn't about to go there.

tazzygirl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 1:07:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant As for not watching the network, you are right in terms of the news presented...Katie Couric is, if possible, more overtly biased than Rather ever was. Wow, i was wondering if i was the only one who thought that.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 1:10:52 PM)
Mnot, yet I have full confidence that the folks reading along at home, got my point, and my explanation of why the 2 apologies are different. And see that your point, as much as you had one, was simply an assertion with crude insults.

tazzygirl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 1:15:47 PM)
hey lucky, how about hitting reply at the top of the post you are responding too? sure would make it easier

mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 1:16:36 PM)
luckster, Thank you for enlightening me, I feel so much more (in every way) the entire fullness of life, now. And I am fully confident that everyone who read your partisan defense, sees that you are trying to make a distinction of no difference. Once again, we find ourselves on opposite ends of the spectrum, and we need not marvel at it. Ron

luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 2:58:22 PM)
Sorry if you are confused Tazzy. But after your earlier assertions that Rather has secret evidence he is holding for a future court date, I see why you want to get off topic. Perhaps you could attack my spelling also.

Moonhead -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 3:01:55 PM)
I wasn't on here before the last election election, but can I assume that everybody who's been whining about Obama in this thread would have shat blood and thrown a tantrum if any morally void liberal had said anything of the sort about Bush? I'd have found the abandonment of that whole "if you diss the Preznent then you hate America" business hilarious if it wasn't so thoroughly pathetic.

mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 3:06:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Sorry if you are confused Tazzy. But after your earlier assertions that Rather has secret evidence he is holding for a future court date, I see why you want to get off topic. Perhaps you could attack my spelling also. Why are you despicably creating bold faced lies and pretending tazzy asserted that he had secret evidence, re read what she said, or post it and parse it for us, she said no such thing, you are twisting words and and babbling like a fuckin moron. Don't be such a goddamn slime, and dont accuse others of your typical bullshit antics. Grow a fuckin sack and man up for fucks sake.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 3:07:00 PM)
yawn yawn Mnot

mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 3:20:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg yawn yawn Mnot you cant be yawning, your foot is in your mouth too deep. gagging maybe. Here you go. You stir up shit, with lies and pretension, you are bound to get a great deal of it on you, you don't have brains enough to pour piss out of a boot, the stuff is still searchable, wait to obfuscate and lie until after you cannot be caught...... He believes he has good grounds for a lawsuit. I wouldnt let any information i had to support that suit out until it needed to come out in court. Too much shifty, shady bs happening these days. and correcting another in their take she quotes it again....... As i said... you arent reading very well tonight... but allow me to find it for you... "He believes he has good grounds for a lawsuit. I wouldnt let any information i had to support that suit out until it needed to come out in court. Too much shifty, shady bs happening these days. " And as usual, you only villify people and accuse, but you haven't one goddamn fact to proffer in evidence.

tazzygirl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 3:42:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Sorry if you are confused Tazzy. But after your earlier assertions that Rather has secret evidence he is holding for a future court date, I see why you want to get off topic. Perhaps you could attack my spelling also. This post has my name on it, yet, its in reply to Mnottertail. If you need help figuring out the format, i will gladly lend you assistance. since its so hard for you to figure out this simple program, i can understand why you didnt understand my post.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/28/2009 4:26:38 PM)
Tazzy, sorry if a post that starts with the name of the person I am replying to as the first word confuses you. It seems wierd that you would start at the bottom, and not grasp how a post that starts "Mnot," is directed to him. But since you lost the actuall debate, it makes sense you focus on this.

Page: << < prev 5 6 [7] 8 9 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

5.078125E-02