AnimusRex
Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth All those movements you mention have one thing in common - 'good intentions' combined with resources available at the time to accomlish a goal. Did any of them solve anything? Are we without corruption in industry since Teddy broke up the Trusts? Has the 'New Deal' generated 100% employment? Did the 'Great Society' make us all equal or create, by statute a 'more equal' group? Did 'Reaganomics' trickle down to all? No - ALL Failed. The problem is many are still be funded with no end in sight in lieu of consideration of alternatives. You give failures as reasoning to continue down the current path of a government solution. They provide a reason to think that there must be a better way. OK, lets take this one at a time: Are we without corruption in industry since Teddy broke up the Trusts? Did TR eradicate all fraud and corruption? Um, no. But yes, he did eradicate a tremendous amount of corruption and monopoly; the fact that we have a competitive market in gacoline and petroleum today? A direct result of the breakup of Standard Oil; the fact that we have a Food & Drug Administration to inspect meat? Again, a direct result of the Progresive Era at the turn of the century. By any reasonable standard, the reforms of that era made huge improvements in our society. Has the 'New Deal' generated 100% employment? No. But it DID put millions- literally, millions of people to work during the Depression, when the private markets simply could not. It is a certainty that actual famine and starvation would have resulted had the New Deal not occurred. And it DID result in Social Security, which even today keeps millions of old people out of poverty. It resulted in soil conservation, agricultural price stabliization, without with the farms that feed America would be a wasteland. The list of things that the New Deal did would take pages; it would be absurd to say that it did not benefit us. Did the 'Great Society' make us all equal or create, by statute a 'more equal' group? Yes...Emphatically, yes. The Civil Rights Bill, the war on poverty- these things had mixed results, with some failures. But to sweep them aside and say they were failures is foolish; it overlooks genuine progress in our society. If you want to argue that the government is too intrusive, great- I can agree, and can find areas where it should retreat. But is you want to go on to a general dismissal of the ability of government to make society better, or do constructive things, then I would disagree.
|