leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LPslittleclip for me and the dynamic im in it is a measure of trust with the one that you are partnered to. as a botttom i had to develop trust with the top i played with.as a sub i had more trust in the relationship but not developed the level of trust with my Mistress that i have now as a slave. this is how it is in my dynamic it works for U/us Yup, that. Which, in the end, means that there is no such thing as a master or a slave. There are only doms and subs and when they hookup and it all goes really well, then we call it master & slave. That, at least, is my interpretation. Note that I don't refer to sexual-only people as submissives, I refer to them as bottoms. I see that as an entirely different beast. But once it goes outside the bedroom, I have a hard time seeing what would limit it other than the mutual trust, respect, and overall compatability of the two people. In the end, you can chase all kinds of statements like "no boundaries", but absolutes seldom work in real life. And, as Drifa pointed out early on, labels only take you so far. In the end, between my wife and I, what there really is is not master and slave or dom and sub. There is Jeff and Carol.
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|