RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MzMia -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 7:38:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

If I were going to "crash" someplace it'd be someplace "fun."
Why would anyone want to "crash" a W.H. "party?"
Oh great, you get to dress up in "formal wear" and stand up straight all the time and no getting drunk or smoking I assume. Then,.....they get to eat *vegetables!* And some "grains" and rice and probably some stinky "curry!" Then talk to strangers about nothing! Wow!
What's on the agenda for next weekend, break into a nursing home and try to tell jokes to alzheimer's patients? "Boy this is a tough crowd, "rimshot."
One person's boring sermon in church is another person's "fun" I guess.
"Hey, I have "connections" with the Indian embassey, you want "in?" "Ah, no thanks, I'd rather chew on tinfoil."


I am enjoying all the responses on this thread.
Sailorman?  You have made me laugh, as you normally do.
I totally agree with people wanting to "crash" a fun party.

On the flip side, I hope they are prosecuted.
[;)]




popeye1250 -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 8:08:31 PM)

Mia, can you imagine putting on a monkey suit just so you can sneak into a place to eat vegetables???
And they probably "shut them off" after two glasses of wine!
"Sheesh, the last time I snuck into the W.H. when Clinton was president they threw me out drunk off my ass and Barbara Streisand licked Hillary's pussy now gimme that bottle honey!"
I mean what's the draw? And "no getting drunk?" Who want's to go to a "party" like that?
A vegetable, rice, and grain eating party where you can't get drunk and have to listen to stuffed shirts with foreign accents.
Those people should be arrested for being *stoopid* not for any type of security breach.
I wouldn't go to something like that if the president *invited* me and they "snuck in?" Cripes, I'd fall asleep at the table!
"Hey Waitron, you got any doggy bags I'm gonna give this shit to my rabbit."
And just because some Indians are vegetarians does that mean everyone else in there had to pretend to be too? Hell, sneak them some pork fried rice, they might like it!




MzMia -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 8:14:13 PM)

Popeye, you might not go, but they are trying to cash in on it.
Last I heard, they are asking about 1 million just to be interviewed.
 
Can you say:  money, money, money?

Party crashers trying to cash in - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room




popeye1250 -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 8:20:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Popeye, you might not go, but they are trying to cash in on it.
Last I heard, they are asking about 1 million just to be interviewed.
 
Can you say:  money, money, money?

Party crashers trying to cash in - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room


Mia, "interviewed?" By who? Who'd even care?
What do they think, "Opra" would be looking to "interview" them? "How was the rice drowned in curry?"




MzMia -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 8:42:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Popeye, you might not go, but they are trying to cash in on it.
Last I heard, they are asking about 1 million just to be interviewed.
 
Can you say:  money, money, money?

Party crashers trying to cash in - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room


Mia, "interviewed?" By who? Who'd even care?
What do they think, "Opra" would be looking to "interview" them? "How was the rice drowned in curry?"


We shall see, I just hope they are brought up on criminal charges.




slvemike4u -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:01:44 PM)

Well Popeye I offer 6 pages of thread as evidence of "who will care"....




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:20:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

There's certainly been less terrorist attacks on America during Obama's first nine months than there were while Bush was settling in, put it that way.


Wrong again. Fort Hood.


I know Fox wants everyone to believe that but there is no evidence to support it was anything but an unstable soldier.




dreamerdreaming -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:29:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

There is some evidence these people had connections to the Indian Embassy;


Maybe they were there to offer him a better deal on his long distance phone calls.



LOL!!!  [:D]




NewOCDaddy -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:33:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

There's certainly been less terrorist attacks on America during Obama's first nine months than there were while Bush was settling in, put it that way.


Wrong again. Fort Hood.


I know Fox wants everyone to believe that but there is no evidence to support it was anything but an unstable soldier.



Is it hard for your eyes to adjust when your head is buried so deep? Oh yeah, seeing things for what they are isnt really that important to you.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:37:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NewOCDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

There's certainly been less terrorist attacks on America during Obama's first nine months than there were while Bush was settling in, put it that way.


Wrong again. Fort Hood.


I know Fox wants everyone to believe that but there is no evidence to support it was anything but an unstable soldier.



Is it hard for your eyes to adjust when your head is buried so deep? Oh yeah, seeing things for what they are isnt really that important to you.



Hi, Willbur. Did you forget which sock puppet you're using tonight?




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:46:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

I wonder if that has anything to do with OBL being allowed to run training camps with no problem for most of Clintons term. Training, funding and deploying terrorist commandos around the world in sleeper cells, ready to attack at a later date. Which began a string of serious violent attacks worldwide for about 5 years begining in 98.



You really either have a poor grasp of recent history or you are intentionally trying to revise it. 

Clinton was met with a great deal of criticism when he did try to do something about Bin-Laden by those who said he was just trying to distract from his personal issues being reported in the media.

Pay special attention to the links at the bottom of the article that argued we should not be targeting Bin-Laden at all.



frontline: hunting bin laden: the trail of evidence

On August 20, 1998, the United States attempted to retaliate against Osama bin Laden for his alleged role in the East Africa U.S. embassy bombings. On that day the U.S. launched dozens of Tomahawk cruise missiles against two targets--several bin Laden training camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan.


But immediately after, questions began to emerge about the choice of targets, and the Clinton administration has yet to satisfactorily answer many of those questions.











rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:49:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NewOCDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

There's certainly been less terrorist attacks on America during Obama's first nine months than there were while Bush was settling in, put it that way.


Wrong again. Fort Hood.


I know Fox wants everyone to believe that but there is no evidence to support it was anything but an unstable soldier.



Is it hard for your eyes to adjust when your head is buried so deep? Oh yeah, seeing things for what they are isnt really that important to you.



Don't give me your usual arrogant bullshit, give me facts.

I know you must have heard of the word, it's all the rage now.




NewOCDaddy -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 10:52:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

I wonder if that has anything to do with OBL being allowed to run training camps with no problem for most of Clintons term. Training, funding and deploying terrorist commandos around the world in sleeper cells, ready to attack at a later date. Which began a string of serious violent attacks worldwide for about 5 years begining in 98.



You really either have a poor grasp of recent history or you are intentionally trying to revise it. 

Clinton was met with a great deal of criticism when he did try to do something about Bin-Laden by those who said he was just trying to distract from his personal issues being reported in the media.

Pay special attention to the links at the bottom of the article that argued we shoukd not be targeting Bin-Laden at all.



frontline: hunting bin laden: the trail of evidence

On August 20, 1998, the United States attempted to retaliate against Osama bin Laden for his alleged role in the East Africa U.S. embassy bombings. On that day the U.S. launched dozens of Tomahawk cruise missiles against two targets--several bin Laden training camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan.


But immediately after, questions began to emerge about the choice of targets, and the Clinton administration has yet to satisfactorily answer many of those questions.




Yes, history might be quite different if hadn't lied his ass off about ML and didnt create the need for investigations and hearings. The whole thing could have been done with in a matter of weeks, and wagging the dog would never have been an issue.




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/29/2009 11:11:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NewOCDaddy

Yes, history might be quite different if hadn't lied his ass off about ML and didnt create the need for investigations and hearings. The whole thing could have been done with in a matter of weeks, and wagging the dog would never have been an issue.


He didn't create the need for it, the Republicans in Congress did.

Unless you think the issue of his extra-marital affairs was the most important thing facing the country then.

Which also does not address the false claim that Clinton did nothing to go after Bin-Laden.

And I'm still waiting on those facts that prove the Ft. Hood shooter was an Islamic terrorist.






willbeurdaddy -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 5:19:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: NewOCDaddy

Yes, history might be quite different if hadn't lied his ass off about ML and didnt create the need for investigations and hearings. The whole thing could have been done with in a matter of weeks, and wagging the dog would never have been an issue.


He didn't create the need for it, the Republicans in Congress did.

Unless you think the issue of his extra-marital affairs was the most important thing facing the country then.

Which also does not address the false claim that Clinton did nothing to go after Bin-Laden.

And I'm still waiting on those facts that prove the Ft. Hood shooter was an Islamic terrorist.





"Allahu Akbar", "Soldier of Allah", counseled wounded soldiers that they should have been killed for participating in a war against Islam.

Case closed.




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 6:59:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


"Allahu Akbar", "Soldier of Allah", counseled wounded soldiers that they should have been killed for participating in a war against Islam.

Case closed.


Offer me some facts Willbeur.

You, apparently taking your cue from Fox, are trying to suggest he had ties to Muslim extremists.

And in turn cite it as a failure of the Obama administration, when in reality you had a respected officer who gradually slipped into mental illness after the death of his parents.  His increasingly bizarre behavior was well-documented.




jackod -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 7:03:18 PM)

They new  husein obama ,while he was still senator,is just publicity trick.Ps: there is just one beast with 2 heads spitting on each other dividing the people,controlled by the international bankes,jack,los ngeles




willbeurdaddy -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 8:18:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


"Allahu Akbar", "Soldier of Allah", counseled wounded soldiers that they should have been killed for participating in a war against Islam.

Case closed.


Offer me some facts Willbeur.

You, apparently taking your cue from Fox, are trying to suggest he had ties to Muslim extremists.

And in turn cite it as a failure of the Obama administration, when in reality you had a respected officer who gradually slipped into mental illness after the death of his parents.  His increasingly bizarre behavior was well-documented.



Those are facts. Deal with it. "Suggest?? he had ties to Muslim extremists"? You certainly know that he was communicating regularly with Anwar al-Awlaki, and was discussing how to make financial transfers sub rosa?

This bullshit is exactly why I dont waste my time responding to your disingenuous crap.




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 9:54:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Those are facts. Deal with it. "Suggest?? he had ties to Muslim extremists"? You certainly know that he was communicating regularly with Anwar al-Awlaki, and was discussing how to make financial transfers sub rosa?

This bullshit is exactly why I dont waste my time responding to your disingenuous crap.


Willbeur, when you question my comments I provide you sources and citations.

Asking you to do the same is simply a matter of common courtesy.

Unless, of course, you really have nothing to back your argument. 

Which seems to be the usual case with you.

You make vague references to make it appear as if there is no question what you are saying is true without ever offering anything substantial.




rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (11/30/2009 11:23:37 PM)

Defense official communicated with WH crashers


WASHINGTON – The couple who crashed the Obama administration's first state dinner communicated with a senior Pentagon official about going to the event, but the official denies that she helped the couple get in.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.152344E-02