RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen?

RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/1/2009 2:45:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Those are facts. Deal with it. "Suggest?? he had ties to Muslim extremists"? You certainly know that he was communicating regularly with Anwar al-Awlaki, and was discussing how to make financial transfers sub rosa? This bullshit is exactly why I dont waste my time responding to your disingenuous crap. Willbeur, when you question my comments I provide you sources and citations. Asking you to do the same is simply a matter of common courtesy. Unless, of course, you really have nothing to back your argument. Which seems to be the usual case with you. You make vague references to make it appear as if there is no question what you are saying is true without ever offering anything substantial. Sorry, but Im not wasting time providing you sources and citations because 1. What I said is in every fucking news report 2. You dismiss any sources for one made up reason or another

mnottertail -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/1/2009 2:51:45 PM)
remember this is the guy that believes in the laffer curve. that should about sum up the depth and breadth of the intellect. but it is interesting to think that the 'liberal media' is a friend to at least one neo-con. Ron

Sanity -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:17:11 PM)
quote: White House: Social Secretary Will Not Testify in Gate-Crashing Probe The Obama administration's social secretary will not testify at a congressional hearing into the security lapse that allowed a Virginia couple to crash last week's state dinner, the White House said Wednesday. Press secretary Robert Gibbs said Desiree Rogers will not testify before the House Homeland Security Committee, which is probing how aspiring reality TV stars Michaele and Tareq Salahi gained entry into the dinner honoring the Indian prime minister. "Staff does not go to testify," Gibbs told reporters during an afternoon briefing, citing the separation of powers and a history of White House staff not testifying before Congress. He did not answer repeated questions about Rogers' performance as social secretary. [img]http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Politics/Desiree_Rogers_monster_397x224.jpg[/img] http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/02/white-house-social-secretary-testify-crasher-gate-probe/ There is only one reason that this president who campaigned on flowery promises of unprecedented openness in government would refuse to allow Desiree Rogers to testify - she has the answers, and he doesn't want them known.

slvemike4u -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:21:13 PM)
I'm not following your thinking here(what else is new)Sanity....are you somehow suggesting President Obama was involved in the screw up.....and/or is involved in a cover up of this incident? BTW...it was a publicity seeking couple crashing a fucking WH dinner....other than the obvious concern over the failure in security.....there is no story here!

rulemylife -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:27:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity There is only one reason that this president who campaigned on flowery promises of unprecedented openness in government would refuse to allow Desiree Rogers to testify - she has the answers, and he doesn't want them known. Uh-oh! Another Obama conspiracy. Thank God we have you Sanity, and Fox, to point them all out. My theory is he secretly has a death wish so he purposely downgraded White House security and now he is desperate to cover up the facts.

servantforuse -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:28:07 PM)
The party crashers wouldn't show the White House their invitation until Obama showed them his birth certificate.

Sanity -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:31:16 PM)
From that same article: quote: New York Rep. Pete King, the top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee, was quick to respond to Gibbs' remarks on Wednesday, saying it is "indefensible" that Rogers will not testify. "It's a needless confrontation. Why are they stonewalling?" King told Fox News.

mnottertail -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:31:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity There is only one reason that this president who campaigned on flowery promises of unprecedented openness in government would refuse to allow Desiree Rogers to testify - she has the answers, and he doesn't want them known. I seem to remember you saying almost that identical thing when there was a probe wanting Cheneys secret meeting with Oil execs exposed to the senate.... Keep sniffing out the corruption and conspiracies buddy. Ron

slvemike4u -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:35:57 PM)
Servant...that joke is a cry for help.....please get it.Clinging in any way shape or form to the birth certificate canard is just sick.....please see your nearest mental health practicioner.[:D] Rule that is the best theory yet put forth in support of Sanity's search for a way to tie this to the Oval Office.Way to think outside the box.....LOL

servantforuse -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:43:02 PM)
You liberals have no sense of humor...I think you guys need the help..

mnottertail -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:49:49 PM)
oh, no mike...........we're all laughing.........alot. Ron

Sanity -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 12:57:10 PM)
Tense White House exchange [sm=lol.gif]

mnottertail -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 1:01:15 PM)
and the peroration is what you missed: In the end, Gibbs recommended that they return to more weighty issues, "like 98,000 men and women in Afghanistan." or is this part of the coverup? do you feel that they are throwing troop into Afghanistan to keep us off the scent of the fact that the secret service is contemplating a coup against the Obama administration, or how exactly does this all tie together? Ron cause I cant spell closing summary

slvemike4u -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 1:02:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse You liberals have no sense of humor...I think you guys need the help.. Au contrair servant...I thought it was mildly amusing.....in a I need help fast sort of way [:D]

servantforuse -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 1:25:43 PM)
It wasn't an original. I heard it at a bar last night.

popeye1250 -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/4/2009 1:40:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse You liberals have no sense of humor...I think you guys need the help.. Servant, I don't think anyone's ever accused liberals of having a sense of humor. Now it's comming out that these vegetable party crashers have, ..."financial problems." Their "horse farm" is in arrears it seems. That would explain their "$one million dollar fee" for an interview. I think the next t.v. show they'll be on is the one with the big bald guy and the fat broad backing up to their Mercedes and hooking it up for a Repo!

Moonhead -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/6/2009 1:07:56 PM)
The whole fuss about this does seem to have been a pretty good example of a partisan teacup storm from the off, but what else would you expect?

popeye1250 -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/6/2009 2:41:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead The whole fuss about this does seem to have been a pretty good example of a partisan teacup storm from the off, but what else would you expect? I don't know Moon, yesterday in Yahoo News there was an article about these deadbeats bouncing a check to the state of Maryland liquor commission, (State Liquor store?) for $13,000 for liquor purchased for a Horsey Polo Fundraiser." "I'll gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today." This isn't about "partisanship" it's about a couple of lowlife, deadbeat, scam artists

slvemike4u -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/6/2009 3:00:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead The whole fuss about this does seem to have been a pretty good example of a partisan teacup storm from the off, but what else would you expect? I don't know Moon, yesterday in Yahoo News there was an article about these deadbeats bouncing a check to the state of Maryland liquor commission, (State Liquor store?) for $13,000 for liquor purchased for a Horsey Polo Fundraiser." "I'll gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today." This isn't about "partisanship" it's about a couple of lowlife, deadbeat, scam artists Perhaps you might point that out to Sanity who is spinning his wheels trying to make something more of this...hell,just read this thread Sanity isn't alone.

Sanity -> RE: White House Party Crashers/How did THAT happen? (12/6/2009 4:38:55 PM)
It may not be nearly as important as the four or five threads per week we see about Sarah Palin's new book, or how she's learning to be a politician, or that there are unfounded rumors circulating about her... but still, it is in the news. [;)] quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead The whole fuss about this does seem to have been a pretty good example of a partisan teacup storm from the off, but what else would you expect?

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 [7] 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875