RE: Sisterhood (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


LaTigresse -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 3:05:35 PM)

Actually..........there are more women on this site that I quite like and enjoy, than the reverse. Many of them I have disagreed with multiple times in debates. We still manage to communicate without rancor and I would love to meet them personally given the opportunity. I don't get the whole 'sisterhood' concept but I do understand mutual respect and admiration.

Unfortunately there are a few that refuse to, agree to disagree, and instead take the disagreement personally. That is when we see the cattiness. Your posts have reflected that........at least in my eyes. Though I am quite sure you will tell me that my opinion matters not. I am fine with that.





LadyAngelika -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 3:07:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

Catty? Really?

More frustrated...this is what was said all the while.

I said the same about a sisterhood a couple pages ago.Perhaps it was missed via the chaos. It is void because we get ugly. I also rarely take offense to what people say. Let them spew. This is why we live here. Freedom of Speech. 

I am usually rather sarcastic. Rarely Catty.

I just believe that if you would leave CM because of a poster, some faceless guy, at that...it's rather sad. To give s/o that much power because of their WORDS...really?  Which is all they are...WORDS. You allow them the power you choose to give them.


Sarcastic humour I adore actually. This didn't feel that way. Perhaps it's all a question of perception.

I'm not going to leave CM because of a poster. I though I made that clear. I said he made me feel like leaving. But I would never give him or anyone that power. If I chose to leave, it will be for a larger set of principles.

- LA




LadyAngelika -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 3:08:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Actually..........there are more women on this site that I quite like and enjoy, than the reverse. Many of them I have disagreed with multiple times in debates. We still manage to communicate without rancor and I would love to meet them personally given the opportunity. I don't get the whole 'sisterhood' concept but I do understand mutual respect and admiration.

Well I'm not sure if it's mutual, but I've enjoyed all of your posts to date.

- LA




windchymes -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 3:16:27 PM)

What she said.




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 3:19:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

Catty? Really?

More frustrated...this is what was said all the while.

I said the same about a sisterhood a couple pages ago.Perhaps it was missed via the chaos. It is void because we get ugly. I also rarely take offense to what people say. Let them spew. This is why we live here. Freedom of Speech. 

I am usually rather sarcastic. Rarely Catty.

I just believe that if you would leave CM because of a poster, some faceless guy, at that...it's rather sad. To give s/o that much power because of their WORDS...really?  Which is all they are...WORDS. You allow them the power you choose to give them.


Sarcastic humour I adore actually. This didn't feel that way. Perhaps it's all a question of perception.

I'm not going to leave CM because of a poster. I though I made that clear. I said he made me feel like leaving. But I would never give him or anyone that power. If I chose to leave, it will be for a larger set of principles.

- LA


It was misconception. I assure you.

Good that you are still here.

Block is our buddy.




LadyPact -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 4:14:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Actually..........there are more women on this site that I quite like and enjoy, than the reverse. Many of them I have disagreed with multiple times in debates. We still manage to communicate without rancor and I would love to meet them personally given the opportunity. I don't get the whole 'sisterhood' concept but I do understand mutual respect and admiration.


I think this is very much how I see the subject.  It's easier for Me to see/feel a connection with some women, but not all women.  It just isn't enough for Me to think that just because the whole of those who identify as Dominant women, we are all automatically linked.  I'm guessing on that level, I'm more interested in the person, rather than the label.

There are definitely Dominant women on these boards who I'm more inclined to think I feel more of a sisterhood type of thing than others.  It's more about Me liking who they are through their words here, rather than basing My opinion on their gender, orientation, or role.  That doesn't necessarily mean that I agree with every word I've ever read out of them, but more the character that they convey when doing so.

Even though we're discussing the topic of sisterhood, and we are on the ask a Mistress board, I have to say that I don't agree with the idea that only Dommes should post here.  I'm noticing that coming across *especially* when it comes to someone who is offering a different style of writing or an opposing opinion.  Quite frankly, when I've answered threads on other boards, such as the Master or submissive section, and someone tried to pull that 'you don't belong here' stuff, I've been very blunt in telling them exactly why I do.  Dominance isn't wrapped up in what type of genitalia someone has and submission is only one half of the kneel.

I tend to have nothing bad to say about 98% of the folks who post around here.  The 2% that I do, I just tell them that I wouldn't want to be associated with if it was personal life instead of a message board.  Yes!  There are a few out there that I wish would find greener pastures than CM, but they sure aren't worth Me giving up that 98% that I find positive interaction.




Level -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 4:15:31 PM)

Hey, I thought I was your buddy. [&o]

Domi has a very unique style of communication lol, and I'm glad he's back. I also like some of the anti-DG folks. I don't see where it has to be either/or; take what you can from where you can, let the rest blow away in the wind, because I promise you, that's where it goes, and that's what it is worth.




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 4:18:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Hey, I thought I was your buddy. [&o]

Domi has a very unique style of communication lol, and I'm glad he's back. I also like some of the anti-DG folks. I don't see where it has to be either/or; take what you can from where you can, let the rest blow away in the wind, because I promise you, that's where it goes, and that's what it is worth.



See the CM meet up thread...perhaps that will appease you my love.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:16:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Why they keep letting him slither back in is beyond me,

Not to pick on you, TDP, because others have said similar things, but the only people allowing slitherification are the people reading the thread who haven't clicked the "Hide" button on domiguy's posts.  There certainly is no consensus, even among the femdoms who post regularly, whether his posts are humorous-and-beneficial or misogynistic-and-hurtful.  So I wouldn't be waiting for the Hand of Mod to swoop down from the sky to save anyone from the evil pixels. 

Don't like it?  Don't read it, and don't respond to it. 



That's fair enough, and for the most part I don't read him. By his own admission, nothing he says is meant to be taken seriously, and I've never gotten the whole "being obnoxious just for the sake of being obnoxious" thing as a form of humor, so why waste time reading it? And I don't respond to him  at all. What is there to say? I don't respond to him any more than I'd bother trying to have a dialogue with a circus clown pedaling around on a unicycle. And for pretty much the same reason.

The problem I have with him is that he's nothing but a troll. He makes no bones about it - he admits that his posting style is to deliberately poke people in order to provoke a reaction. He does this most often by insulting people. If anyone else wandered in here and started doing that, everybody would line up shoulder to shoulder and call them a troll, so how is domi not a troll? But for some reason, a lot of people here think he's a funny troll, so instead of running him out on a rail the way they would any other troll, people fall all over themselves making excuses for him and patting him on his pointy little head - "oh, he's not really as much of an asshole as he acts." And often ridiculing the people who complain about him, accusing them of being the problem because they don't have a sense of humor; they're not seeing the "real" domiguy.

Fuck that. On a message board, you are what you post, and if you consistently and deliberately post like an asshole, then you're an asshole. It's discouraging to me that for a lot of people, the fact that they find him an amusing asshole makes it OK. To my mind, like any other troll, his self-centered bullshit is disruptive and degrades the experience of reading and posting here. I know that I'm in the minority, but I see absolutely nothing of value in his self-indulgent attention whore routine. He's obviously a really bright guy, but none of that comes through in any sort meaningful form, because it's all drowned out by the bullshit.

The reason I'd like to see him bounced out of here once and for all is the same reason I don't want any trolls infesting the place - he contributes nothing but disruption, and has no redeeming qualities. Others obviously disagree, so I'm sure they'll enjoy however many days or weeks he lasts before being "banned" again this time, but personally I'll enjoy the forums a lot more when he gets his ass pitched headfirst out the door again.

Edited to add: And while we're at it, I never liked the Three Stooges either. So fuck them, too!




LadyPact -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:25:22 PM)

By some of your criteria, Panda, I'll bet there's a few folks who see Me just as much of an asshole.  Nobody's gotten rid of Me yet and it ain't gonna happen.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:28:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

By some of your criteria, Panda, I'll bet there's a few folks who see Me just as much of an asshole.  Nobody's gotten rid of Me yet and it ain't gonna happen.


LP, you are direct in your tone and firm in your opinions, but I've never seen you ever remotely close to an asshole.

- LA




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:29:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

By some of your criteria, Panda, I'll bet there's a few folks who see Me just as much of an asshole.  Nobody's gotten rid of Me yet and it ain't gonna happen.


Couldn't be further from the truth. You post a considerable volume of of worthwhile work, and you do it in good faith. Domi does neither. His stated intent is to be obnoxious and provoke people. That's a world of difference.




Level -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:30:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SDFemDom4cuck

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Hey, I thought I was your buddy. [&o]

Domi has a very unique style of communication lol, and I'm glad he's back. I also like some of the anti-DG folks. I don't see where it has to be either/or; take what you can from where you can, let the rest blow away in the wind, because I promise you, that's where it goes, and that's what it is worth.



See the CM meet up thread...perhaps that will appease you my love.



*smooch*

[:)]




Level -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:33:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Edited to add: And while we're at it, I never liked the Three Stooges either. So fuck them, too!



Now, Panda, that's crazy talk! Nyuck nyuck nyuck! [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:35:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika
LP, you are direct in your tone and firm in your opinions, but I've never seen you ever remotely close to an asshole.

- LA

I am literally nominating this as one of the best, open barn door opportunities for a strap on joke for the entire YEAR!

[sm=passthelube.gif]




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:41:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
Edited to add: And while we're at it, I never liked the Three Stooges either. So fuck them, too!



Now, Panda, that's crazy talk! Nyuck nyuck nyuck! [:D]


Why, I oughta.... whack! Ow ow ow!!!




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:43:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


LP, you are direct in your tone and firm in your opinions, but I've never seen you ever remotely close to an asshole.



Oh, I don't know. She spent an afternoon with me once, and then we spent some time together at Folsom, too.




LadyPact -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:45:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


LP, you are direct in your tone and firm in your opinions, but I've never seen you ever remotely close to an asshole.



Oh, I don't know. She spent an afternoon with me once, and then we spent some time together at Folsom, too.


Pffft.  You're not an asshole.  Had a great time talking with you on both occasions.

Speaking of which, when are you coming back?




mnottertail -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:46:16 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE9hubGnqQM&feature=related

thats as serious as i will get the rest of the year.







ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Sisterhood (12/29/2009 5:47:52 PM)

March! I still haven't made up my mind about whether I'd rather move to the LA area or the Bay Area, but while I'm prevaricating, I'm planning to come out for another vacation in March. Dates still to be firmed up, which i should probably get serious about pretty quickly here.

Which reminds me, I'd better pay off the parking tickets from my last trip out there, or I'll get arrested at the airport....




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875