Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Misogyny and BDSM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 1:09:48 AM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

(P.S.: You have a CM message!)

Now you do


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 901
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 1:15:25 AM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline
quote:

I think what you mean is that as more people dogpiled on me, I got more and more defensive.  I don't curl up into a ball and give up.  I fight back.  And I get the very real sense that you are saying I deserve to be attacked because I fight back.

And what does that mean, painted a huge target on my back?  All you are doing here is blaming me for your actions.  Is that really what you want to say, that I am somehow compelling you to engage in your very hypocritical attack on me?  That you have no ability to stop yourself because of my actions?

If that's not what you're saying, then stop insisting that something I did is forcing your hand.


I believe what he (she? it doesn't say the name) means is that in this conversation from what I can tell you made no effort to temper your words out of consideration for the feelings of others. You went into the conversation with a sense of your own superiority, and you said at least twice that you were behaving that way for "fun" or "amusement."

So guess what. You're not the only one who thinks it's fun to fuck with people. You think your intellect is superior to mine and have no qualms showing it, well I think that I, and many others here, have a superior intellect *and* superior wit to you. Why would you expect us not to show it? You might get annoyed that people are pointing out your parlour isn't a parlour, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who got annoyed reading "I didn't call her an idiot because of <vague BS technicality that didn't even make sense>" when an apology could have sufficed.

And if you make no apology about posting what you think, in the style you enjoy, regardless of how well it comes across to others, then you're going to find that people are going to respond the same way.

This post really just sounds like "You all did the same thing I was doing except it's unfair because there are more of you" - but really now, up until 10 pages ago Aynne and I couldn't stand each others guts. I'd never had any protracted conversation with Luscious or SexyRed, and my relationship with Lucienne is kind of a "we like each other but we won't admit it in a non-snarky way" thing. This wasn't a coordinated attack of "hags" (dude I'm younger than you, if I'm a forum "hag" wtf are you?) this was a bunch of people, looking at a flame war, and choosing sides based on merit.

And really the best flames in this came from the guys. Ebony and Ron I'm looking at you two. Reading "I bet Kant had a parlour" or "What, you don't like Kant" made me seriously laugh the fuck out loud. So don't blame us hags.

< Message edited by Elisabella -- 1/5/2010 1:17:28 AM >

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 902
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 1:56:53 AM   
wandersalone


Posts: 4666
Joined: 11/21/2005
Status: offline
Psychonaut .... if I may please make a comment as someone who hasn't been participating in the wars on this thread.

You make mention over and over about how you didn't start things, that you were simply responding to other people's initial attacks on you or comments about you.  If at the time you had instead chosen to act with grace and had decided to be the grown-up in all of this I am pretty sure this thread would not have escalated into the dog-fight it became.

Yes I can understand wanting to reply when people say things you don't agree with, especially if it is personal however truly..... has this helped you at all? To the other viewers of this thread we see you replying with thinly veiled attacks on others, we see a whole lot of people all saying a similar thing about one person - you and truthfully, no one has come out looking like an angel.

But maybe, maybe if you had chosen to be a bigger person and had walked away right at the beginning you would not have seen this devolve so greatly.  Is it unfair? Yes.  But you know, at some stage we all have to make a choice to act like an adult and maybe this was one of those times.

I wish you peace and contentment in 2010


_____________________________

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. Martin Luther King
Godmother of the subbie mafia
My all time favourite threads
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2002501
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=790885

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 903
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 3:25:19 AM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

Actually, fuck that.

I don't even want a fucking thing to do with this forum anymore.



People hit you with all type of shit and you argue them up and down all 8 corners of the room. But they dis your parlor and you pack up and leave? Wasn't expecting that.

< Message edited by blacksword404 -- 1/5/2010 3:55:20 AM >


_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 904
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 3:29:16 AM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

And if it were one person fucking with me, then that would be it.  But my issue is with the multiple people dogpiling on me, discussing me in the third person, dismissing me entirely as a human being and engaging in a process of outsidering that will leave me a pariah.


And how many of those people did you call "idiots" or "idiotic" or "dumb bunny" or now "hags" or otherwise personally insult?

You're coming across as someone who can't take his own medicine. And while I feel you on the whole "a bunch of people ganging up on you" thing, you have to understand that you've not only made no effort to be friendly, but you've maintained a condescending attitude throughout.

What I'm saying is that if you come and act as though you believe yourself to be superior in some manner to other people, other people are going to do the same. Really, you come across as rude. It would be one thing if you said "I don't feel that's a valid argument" or "if we're going to stick to logical debate you just committed xyz fallacy" but instead you say "You don't know anything about debating. Only an idiot would do that. Go educate yourself. What I'm saying is too complex for me to explain to you so I'm just going to say I'm right and you're dumb."

I'm not saying you "deserve" to be ridiculed. I'm saying the reason you were isn't hard to figure out. And I know you want to get upset that the rest of us aren't better, more ethical people, but now you're aware that most of us aren't going to take the high road. If you wish to continue debating things with people who insult you, you know what kind of people they are. It's pointless to tell us "you should be better" because if we're not good enough, you don't have to talk to us. You can ignore us.

quote:

I'm fine with a friendly little scuffle, but I don't think that's the same thing as joing in with a bunch of other people to mob someone.  As soon as it becomes a mob mentality, with people engaging in "two minutes of hate" style rhetoric, sitrring each other up, then I bail.  I won't be part of a gang-rape.  And I don't think comparing me being kind of a dick to people getting caught up in a mob is actually a reasonable comparison.


It's not a comparison, it's a cause and effect.

quote:

You asked me for an apology at the wrong time (and also, you're not who I was talking to, I don't have to apologize to you), and being under attack by many people I didn't feel like budging an inch.  So I tried to snow-job you.  Whatever.  You win, I for all intents and purposes called her an idiot.  Happy?


I didn't ask for an apology. Nobody asked you for an apology. She asked you for an explanation of why you called her an idiot when she said nothing negative to you. You said you didn't, and I pointed out you did.

And no I'm not happy. I wasn't telling you that you said it because I was trying to "win" or "prove you wrong" - I was trying to show you that you did, in fact, do it, so that you'd be able to answer her question and tell her why you did it.

You're excusing your own behaviour with 'whatever, I was in a bad mood, people were being rude to me' but you can't accept other people saying 'whatever, we were annoyed, you were being a dick.' Pick one or the other, because you see it as an individual dealing with a mob but I'm just seeing a lot of individuals.

quote:

And those people formed a mob, and when that happened they should have checked themselves.  Because online a mob can do serious damage and make someone an outcast.  Me posting what I think, in the style I enjoy, regardless of how well it comes across to others doesn't make it impossible for you to enjoy the forum.  Everyone turning me into this week's punching bag does make it impossible for me to use the forums.  It forces me to be on continuous defensive, and that is insanely stressful on a psychic level.


Why should I have checked myself when you didn't? Because I was 'part of a mob'? I didn't see myself as part of a mob, I saw myself as Bella, posting in reply to various individuals. I went a really long time just responding to your posts, but eventually I had enough.

The "mob" didn't make me start to make fun of you. The fact that you tried to get all semantic on me over whether or not you insulted someone unprovoked did. That's when I said "fuck it, why am I taking this so seriously" and turned snarky.

It doesn't matter whether or not you "deserve" it on some abstract level - that's the reason. You now know the reason. You now know that introducing argument and condescension for the purpose of watching people "scurry" for your own "amusement" is going to give you this result.

If you hit me, and I punch you back, that doesn't mean you "deserve" to be punched, but it does mean that you know that if you do it again, you'll get the same response. If you don't want to get punched again, you won't punch me. If you want to try to convince me that you don't "deserve" to be punched even if you punch me first, you can feel free to do so, but that's your choice. If it's stressing you out offline or you're worried about your social reputation you might do well to learn that sometimes the benefits of compromise outweigh the "fun" of being right.

quote:

No, I think they were choosing sides based on factors other than merit.  No one seems to have picked my side, and yet I think its a little ridiculous to claim my position has absolutely no merit at all.  Nobody joined my side because when the mob forms to chase after Frankenstein, it takes a person of rare and exceptional courage to stand with the "monster."


I think sides were chosen based on personality rather than merit of argument.

That being said, most people weren't saying "You are wrong in your argument" with the flames. They were saying "LOL I don't like you."

quote:

Forum hag is a play on fag hag, that's all.  And an allusion to the nastiness of the behavior.


Again I'll just say, if it makes you feel superior, feel free to judge my nastiness. If that's what you want out of this forum - to feel "right" and "superior."

If you're more interested in meeting people and being a part of the forum, you'd do best to leave the superior attitude to those who get turned on by it.

I'm not saying either course of action is better for you. I'm just saying it's up to you to choose.

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 905
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 4:13:53 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZeroAnd I wasn't here a week ago! Excuse meeeee for being fashionably late.



*pictures NZ with a fake arrow in his head while writing that*

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 906
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 4:55:39 AM   
blacksword404


Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

Yeah, I know.  Except most of them were saying I was wrong when they MEANT they didn't like me.  This is a good example of why I think they are stupid.



You are stupid! You are stupid! Oh, and don't forget, you are STUPID!
Dexter's Laboratory

_____________________________

Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole.

Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum

Genuine catnip/kryptonite.
Ego sum erus.

The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 907
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 4:57:09 AM   
Aynne88


Posts: 3873
Joined: 8/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

I think what you mean is that as more people dogpiled on me, I got more and more defensive.  I don't curl up into a ball and give up.  I fight back.  And I get the very real sense that you are saying I deserve to be attacked because I fight back.

And what does that mean, painted a huge target on my back?  All you are doing here is blaming me for your actions.  Is that really what you want to say, that I am somehow compelling you to engage in your very hypocritical attack on me?  That you have no ability to stop yourself because of my actions?

If that's not what you're saying, then stop insisting that something I did is forcing your hand.


I believe what he (she? it doesn't say the name) means is that in this conversation from what I can tell you made no effort to temper your words out of consideration for the feelings of others. You went into the conversation with a sense of your own superiority, and you said at least twice that you were behaving that way for "fun" or "amusement."

So guess what. You're not the only one who thinks it's fun to fuck with people. You think your intellect is superior to mine and have no qualms showing it, well I think that I, and many others here, have a superior intellect *and* superior wit to you. Why would you expect us not to show it? You might get annoyed that people are pointing out your parlour isn't a parlour, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who got annoyed reading "I didn't call her an idiot because of <vague BS technicality that didn't even make sense>" when an apology could have sufficed.

And if you make no apology about posting what you think, in the style you enjoy, regardless of how well it comes across to others, then you're going to find that people are going to respond the same way.

This post really just sounds like "You all did the same thing I was doing except it's unfair because there are more of you" - but really now, up until 10 pages ago Aynne and I couldn't stand each others guts. I'd never had any protracted conversation with Luscious or SexyRed, and my relationship with Lucienne is kind of a "we like each other but we won't admit it in a non-snarky way" thing. This wasn't a coordinated attack of "hags" (dude I'm younger than you, if I'm a forum "hag" wtf are you?) this was a bunch of people, looking at a flame war, and choosing sides based on merit.

And really the best flames in this came from the guys. Ebony and Ron I'm looking at you two. Reading "I bet Kant had a parlour" or "What, you don't like Kant" made me seriously laugh the fuck out loud. So don't blame us hags.


Agrees with all, and if anything good came from this it is the other side talks with Elisabella especially, and also my favorite SexyRed, and Lucienne, and the courteous brilliant gentlemen that did indeed take you down more than any of us forum hags did. For you to claim that you were dogpiled is so ridiculous, dude, everything is right here in the archives, you know, evidence and all that. You started this, you provoked it, you added fuel to flames, and oh no, boo hoo, you actually *gasp* got verbally smacked down in return. Some nicer  than others. I don't pretend to be nice when attacked, I'm pretty much a fan of self preservation, a bit more Gotti than Ghandi. Sue me, I'm also a humanist, so the thoughts of punishment in the afterlife being removed makes it so much easier to be myself, good or bad.

Ebony and Ron, just priceless.

Barring me, the ignorance you presented to SexyRed just as one example, was so desultory I can not beleive you still cry "picked upon." That in itself just oh so clearly shows you don't have to cajones to run with the big dogs, so just chill on the porch with insults and smug attitude, I am sure it makes you very very popular with your "real life" friends.


_____________________________

As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
—Isaac Bashevis Singer, writer and Nobel laureate (1902–1991)



(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 908
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 5:16:19 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

And if it were one person fucking with me, then that would be it.  But my issue is with the multiple people dogpiling on me, discussing me in the third person, dismissing me entirely as a human being and engaging in a process of outsidering that will leave me a pariah.



It hasn't left you a pariah. There must be more people that have followed the thread than me that found the personal slights and spitefulness distasteful.

You might be an aquired taste. I don't find you or your style of posting offensive, and the things you've said to others wouldn't have provoked me to attack you in a personal manner, even if they'd been directed at me.

I don't care how offensive other people have found you .....you've suffered far more at their hands, whether you brought it on yourself or not.

And yes......argueing JUST because you don't like someone, or the way they debate, is stupid. It depends what people are used to and how sensitive they are to certain *insults* implied or otherwise as to how they react.

A *for instance*........I wouldn't be at all *offended* if you informed me that I wasn't a feminist because I smile and make big eyes at the mechanic at my garage because I'm hoping they'll fit my car in for repair quicker than if I didn't. I KNOW I do it, it's deliberate, it's self serving and likely not *ethical* if I'm an out and out feminist. I happen to think that I'm obviously NOT a feminist because of my behaviour. I want to be treated equally as and when I choose. I would be miffed if I worked for four days on someone's garden and got paid less because I was a girl....I'm a hypocite in that manner. But I'm not going to attack you for spelling that out. It's the truth.

You are a little abrasive, but I'm quite robust and am used to all manner of *styles* of communication. I hope you don't bugger off..........but I also hope you find some way of being here that fits you as I've enjoyed your contributions.

agirl





(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 909
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 5:20:36 AM   
InvisibleBlack


Posts: 865
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

I left livejournal because [a] group...


Somewhere else you mention getting into a months long flamewar on ED and I believe you also discussed getting into a protracted back and forth on some other online venue. I'm in a rush since I have to head out towork soon and so I don't have the time right now to thread dive and find the relevant passages.

You're a bright guy. I think you've got a lot to offer. You're knowledgeable. I believe your underlying problem is the way you present yourself. Many people I know both in real life and amongst the posters on these forums can be abrupt, sarcastic, caustic, condescending, arrogant and self-important. I can manage these worthy attributes myself from time to time. Such behavior is tolerable (and often admired - even if grudgingly) when someone is making valid points or displaying expertise in an area or field that is clearly above the average.

I think the issue is, quite often you come across as judgemental. No one likes to feel judged and even less to be judged and found wanting. I will show two examples one I grabbed from clicking on a random page of this thread and one from your last post:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23
It a widely held opinion by people who know what they are talking about.


This is an implied insult. It isn't necessary to make your point (that your opinion in this matter is widely held), and it directly diminshes the person who disagreed with you by claiming that they don't "know what they are talking about" - in fact it pretty much implies that anyone who disagrees with your opinion doesn't know what they are talking about. This is neither necessary nor sufficient to win the debate, it's an attack on the character of the person(s) on the other side. The fact that it's a passive attack (the active form being "You obviously don't know what you're talking about") doesn't merit any leniency in the levelof response in most people's minds.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23
This is a good example of why I think they are stupid.


Nobody wants to be called stupid. Even in reference to an explanation of why they don't like you. Even if they are stupid - and (in all honesty) I don't believe any of the poster's here are stupid. Even the ones who post the most twistedly convoluted conspiracy theories in the P&ORS are obviously intelligent, I just believe they are operating from poorly understood premises.

It's possible to disagree with someone on multiple matters and still respect them. It's possible to think someone is completely and utterly  wrong and still allow for them to have arrived at their conclusions through a rational thinking process. Many people disagree with me. Obviously, I think they are mistaken. I may think that their opinions are foolish, uninformed, ignorant or just flat out insane - but it is insulting for me to tell them so and I fully understand that were I to do so they would be justified in feeling insulted. I would feel insulted if someone told me my opinion was just plain wrong and stupid. It's an underlying issue of courtesy. The basic formula of discussion I try to put forward is of the nature of "If you believe A, how do you account for B, C and D which contradict A?". I deliberately try and avoid responses or questions which, if you boil them down, are either "You're wrong" or an insult.

To my mind, once you've resulted in name-calling, you're tacitly admitting you've lost the arguement.

I haven't even thought about Immanuel Kant in probably a decade. I'm glad you brought him up in this thread. We had a discussion at work about the nature of ethics and whether there can be a universal ethic yesterday based solely on your initial position vis a vis Kant. Thank you for that. I think your underlying arguements, which were intelligent and informed, weren't what people were taking objection to.

I tend to wax too verbose. My ten cents of advice is to extend to others the courtesy you seek for yourself and, when it isn't offered to you, to rise above another's incivility. Acceptance in any social circle takes time and sometimes you have to go through a fair amount of ribbing to earn your way "in". Post without insult or rancor and let your ideas and your method of expression stand for themselves. The rest comes with time.

Now I've got to run. Catch y'all later tonight.

_____________________________

Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff.

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 910
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 5:59:53 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
I never figured you were gone, just hid your profile, and pulled a dramatic flounce. Your communication skills still need some work, because if you are in a medium, that you are supposedly a professional at (writer), you are failing to convey what you actually mean.


I find that a very useless criticism.  I don't think anyone is really making any effort to understand what I mean, and I think many people are very intentionally reading my posts with malign intent, seeking to distort, twist and ridicule everything I say.


Some may well be twisting your words once the flame wars started, but not before that. Some have tried to engage you in discussion, and you have either attacked them, or written in a way that did not convey what you intended. You have to own your words, especially as a writer, so the error in communication is not one sided. Ignoring that means that when ever you run into this situation, it will likely happen the same way each time. If you make a change on your side though, then the outcome has a chance of changing. Do you see what I am saying?
quote:


quote:

BTW, you are failing as a psychonaut as well, because you are creating an internal image, rather than discovering what is there. You seem to cast no "shadow", but in fact we all do. You have created the "Wise Old Man", when in fact the "Fox" is prevelant within the Wise Old Man's guise. This is at least what I am seeing from your posts, which sometimes is not a true measure of a person, but often it is what they really are without filters. If you are truly interested in being a soul sailor, might I suggest a bit of ego death to assist you. Some may not understand what I have said in this last paragraph, but if you are as educated as you portray yourself to be, you will know exactly what is being said.


I do understand what you're saying, but I think you're entirely out of line.  You don't know me, and to assume you have the sort of deep insight into me that you would need to tell me that I'm "failing as a psychonaut" from internet posts that you are reading with a fair amount of prejudice is an act both condescending and pompous.


If that is how it is coming across, allow me to try again slightly differently. On the internet people often come across without the same societal filters they would face to face. This has different effects, and one of them is that often it shows many of the personality traits or inner workings very blatantly. These are observations, based upon your words.

quote:


The problem is that if I act from an egoless space on an online forum, you know what happens?   It's called lurking.  Forever.  Everyone here has some bit of their ego on the line, and not a single one of you would enjoy being treated like I'm being treated.  And I'll believe you'd deal with it better when I see it happen to you.  I'm really not any more pompous than anyone else here, Mr. I Can See Into Your Soul Through The Internet.   I'm not any more sexist or crass that Aynne and her lovely "Psychotwat" monkier.  I'm not any more long winded or a posuer than Anwar.   I haven't done anything extraordinary to deserve to be ganged up on and given the treatment.


I am not saying act from an egoless space, I am suggesting leading with your ego a little less. Whether we would enjoy being treated like you are being treated, matters not. You wrote certain things, and acted in a certain way, and now the consequences are happening. That is called life, and it is often harsh, but my beliefs are that it is supposed to be harsh. Looking at the word choice and approach in this paragraphs shows, at least subconsciously, that you want things to continue as they are.

quote:


You know what I think I did wrong?  I think I'm guilty of being new and not wanting to play forum bitch for the amusement of this small group of extra nasty collered subs who seem to think they have to prove they are only submitting to one man by attacking any self-proclaimed dominant male who doesn't treat them like Dommes.


If your hypothesis was correct, then everyone that is new would be treated the same way, and they are not. Try researching the approach some of those new people made. Own up and take responsibility for your words and actions, this is one of the place I observe that you are failing on that inward journey. Even here in this paragraph you are attempting to excuse how you have acted, and create something that is not accurate so you do not have to face the portion of all of this that you created.

quote:


And I think there's a lot of dickheads here, like Ebony Wood, that know they can look dominant by attacking once the forum hags have selected a target.  It's whole lot of very obvious social politics and monkey-mob mentality.  And the people who got caught up in it should be far, far more embarassed and ashamed at joing in with a mob frenzy than I should be (and am) at getting defensive when I'm actually being attacked by a mob.


Look you stepped on your dick, and when it got pointed out, you started on the attack as much as any other. You could have taken a different approach without appearing submissive or a "bitch". You are the one that chose this tactic, and you are continuing with it. So as long as you continue, it is going to continue. Now the question becomes what do you find more important, for it to stop, or for your ego to be satisfied? Your choice, people are not puppet masters unless you allow them to be.

quote:


I want to be able to use this site for what its intended, and I want to be able to participate in the forums  -- and be just as snarky, stupid, and often wrong as anyone else -- so that I have an increased chance of meeting someone.


If that is your priority then here is my advice, ignore the baiting and flames. Move onto other topics and post positive contributions.

quote:


But I'm just a human  being.  If people here are going to choose to make me the forum bitch and start mocking me all the time over every piddly thing I say just because it's "funny" to make someone a pariah, then I'm pretty much fucked, aren't I?  I can't compete against a dozen people determined to make me look like a fool.  Just the fact that they agree with each as part of the process makes it appear true, and often the appearance of truth has more effect than what is true.


Look you have to own some of your own behavior. You will find that several of us that has/had a problem with you and what you said, have been at each other before and likely will again. I am going to leave my comments about this there, as I would like for this to have a positive impact (hopefully).

quote:


I just wish people would be aware of how they are acting collectively.  Not organized, but still collectively.  How would any of you feel being treated like this?


You cannot control others, just yourself. Many here would like for you to be aware of how you are acting. Try to eliminate any duplicity in your examination of actions.

quote:


And fuck the first person who tries to say that a mob ganging up on one person for utterly piddly shit is fair or right.  You're a fucking creep if you think that.



Fair and right exist only as ideals, and is rarely reached in life. This is why fair and right mean less, then how things are. We are not going to create some utopian world where the meta-ethics of Kant actually apply. Look at the fact that you own some of this, and work on what you own. The rest will work itself out.

Well there is my advice, and last attempt to try and be positive to you, until I see some effort. You say you are a smart guy, so now it is the time to show it. Try reading some Tao Tzu, it really would help in this situation.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 911
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 6:02:42 AM   
lusciouslips19


Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I wasn't, as InvisibleBlack suggests, citing my IQ as a relevant factor in the consideration of anything I was saying. You sarcastically asked me if I thought I was a genius because of some inane thing, and I just as sarcastically quipped back that I thought I was a genius because my IQ scores at 154. One of the technical definitions of a genius is "Anyone with an IQ over 130." Since I am over that threshold, I can claim official genius status and join MENSA. Woo hoo.


Thats not true. You said it in response to me and I never said anything about that. Go back through the posts. I would expect someone with such "high intellect" to have a better memory and a better grasp on what they said to whom and for what reason.

_____________________________

Original Pimpette,
Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes
Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags,
Member of the Subbie Mafia
Princess of typos and it's my prerogative

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 912
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 6:10:51 AM   
twistedreality


Posts: 64
Joined: 5/22/2008
Status: offline
ewwwww you made an error! That's such a good argument against intellect.

(in reply to lusciouslips19)
Profile   Post #: 913
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 6:22:13 AM   
lusciouslips19


Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88



Nihilus, I get you are truly trying to help him, and you are a better person than I. I don't give a fuck anymore, he insulted far too many of my friends here repeatedly and went after me with a creepy vengeance, I'm with EbonyWood and SexyRed on this one. I don't give a fuck. Sorry, well not sorry, but yeah, no olive branches for him. He needs some therapy, and soon before he turns into Michael Douglas' character in falling down. Issues galore and anger...wow. It's scary. The sad scary kind.


I agree with Nihilus's comments. At least he could reach Psychnaut with it. I too enjoyed his discussions with Elizabella far back when talking about racism. I thought,"wow, these 2 are really smart".

I am blown away by intellect. But not insults and narcisssim. Because high reasoning should stand on its own and if you have a position you should be able to reason with it or say, "I concede on this point". Elizabella is an example of one who has been gracious coupled with high intellect a and sound reasoning. That earns my respect more than anything.

_____________________________

Original Pimpette,
Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes
Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags,
Member of the Subbie Mafia
Princess of typos and it's my prerogative

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 914
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 7:05:04 AM   
kiwisub12


Posts: 4742
Joined: 1/11/2006
Status: offline
Interestingly, most humans realise that style of communication affects how people react to them very early - like kindegarten.
It would seem that PN has yet to come to this realization - he himself says he has been run out of other forums, for personality issues would be my guess. One sign of intelligence is to acknowledge the problem, look at the problem, come up with some solutions and test them out. If he wants friends online in this community, perhaps this is a process that coudl be implimented.

There are any number of quirky characters on this forum, and most are enjoyed, tolerated or snarked at. Every individual has to decide which reception they get - but if you enjoy throwing the shit in the fire and watching the peons scurry, then you have to reap what you sow - to mix metaphors terribly.

(in reply to lusciouslips19)
Profile   Post #: 915
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 7:13:31 AM   
lusciouslips19


Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:


I was excited when she used the dictionary fallacy and leapt for the kill. That's it.


Why? You said you only attack when provoked? So you perceive me as weaker than you? I am hardly dead. I may admit a lesser IQ, but I am hardly dumb. I rather enjoy being perceived as a ditz and then tripping you up with it myself. I have yet to insult you though.

Funny, how later you went on to use a definition yourself and when I called you on it, you said it wasnt the same fallacy because you used a philosophical source. Seriously? Wikipedia is a better source? When others do it their "idiots", but when you do it, its righteous. So in your quest to be right and superior you made yourself look like a hypocrite and a fool.

< Message edited by lusciouslips19 -- 1/5/2010 7:49:06 AM >


_____________________________

Original Pimpette,
Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes
Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags,
Member of the Subbie Mafia
Princess of typos and it's my prerogative

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 916
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 7:45:06 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
What the fuck, starts out about guys who hate cunts, now its a fuckin zombie thread, the guy rises from the dead........and none the wiser for having gone down to sheol.

Woot!!!!!!!

GAWD!!!!!!! I love this town!!!!!!!!!!!

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lusciouslips19)
Profile   Post #: 917
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:22:51 AM   
lusciouslips19


Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007
Status: offline
One more thing to add Psychonaut,

When you go in for the "kill", dont expect us to not fight back.
And don't underestimate your "opponent".



By the way, I love your intellect. Just take away the grandiosity and superiority complex, and the insults of peoples intelligence. If those flaws are tempered, you would be most welcomed here.

_____________________________

Original Pimpette,
Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes
Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags,
Member of the Subbie Mafia
Princess of typos and it's my prerogative

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 918
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:38:37 AM   
MsDDom


Posts: 368
Joined: 1/1/2009
From: GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy519

I'm new to the forums, and maybe its just the small sample size but I see some disturbing trends where posters seem to have a strong misogynistic leaning.

There's a part of me that thinks they are merely trolls seeking reaction, and if that's how they enjoy filling the emptiness in their lives the more power to them.

But...there is a part of me that wonders if some who truly hate women see BDSM as an outlet for their anger?

It lends credence to some articles I've read by the anti-BDSM crowd that all dominants are misogynists (these articles exclusively attribute dominance to males).  But we all know that's bullshit.

Is this a new phenomenon, Where places like CM have become venues in which misogyny can be worn like a badge?




...some do, some don't...that is the thing, we don't really know why people TRULY enter the lifestyle.  Sometimes, it is just a "crap shot" and the outcome is not to get "snake eyes"...


_____________________________

...:: MsDDom ::...

... live Life honestly ...

(in reply to Daddy519)
Profile   Post #: 919
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:51:18 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

One more thing to add Psychonaut,

When you go in for the "kill", dont expect us to not fight back.
And don't underestimate your "opponent".



By the way, I love your intellect. Just take away the grandiosity and superiority complex, and the insults of peoples intelligence. If those flaws are tempered, you would be most welcomed here.


THIS.....font size increased by me for emphasis. Psychonaut, there is no disgrace in saying you were wrong or backing down, if anything it will make us respect you more for having done it.

Lushy, I would have used the word "traits" or "actions" instead of "flaws" which might get his back up. Aside from that, perfect post.


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to lusciouslips19)
Profile   Post #: 920
Page:   <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125