RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela

RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

slvemike4u -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 4:45:00 PM)
Said the pot to the kettle.....

DarlingSavage -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 4:48:40 PM)
Give me brie or give me death!

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 4:55:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage Give me brie or give me death! Give me Rossingnol or give me Head[;)]

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 4:59:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Said the pot to the kettle..... It's nice that you notice[;)]

slvemike4u -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 5:43:41 PM)
Is that the whole point thompson....make completly outlandish statements,baiting and engaging everyone who chooses to call you on the bullshit? In that case well done!

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 6:43:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Is that the whole point thompson....make completly outlandish statements,baiting and engaging everyone who chooses to call you on the bullshit? In that case well done! [/quote. I have no clue what you are talking about. I posted several questions for you and you,so far, have not felt qualified to answer. Calling me an asshole or anti-american does not constitute an answer. Either prove me wrong or appologize...it is just not that hard.

slvemike4u -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 6:48:45 PM)
Fuck that, and while we are at it FUCK YOU....not only have I answered your questions I have done so with the utmost patience(in consideration of your obviously diminished capacity). Now let me ask you a question...where did you get the idea that I was restricted to two,and only two,options(answer or apologise) this is the fucking internet asshole....there are a multitude of options open to me.

Marc2b -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 6:51:58 PM)
quote: Give me brie or give me death! I'll bring the chardonay.

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 7:11:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Fuck that, and while we are at it FUCK YOU....not only have I answered your questions I have done so with the utmost patience(in consideration of your obviously diminished capacity). Now let me ask you a question...where did you get the idea that I was restricted to two,and only two,options(answer or apologise) this is the fucking internet asshole....there are a multitude of options open to me. Wrong thread but since you jumped threads here are the questions you have not answered. quote: You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the "sandbox"? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Grenada? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Viet nam? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Nicaragua? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in El Salvadore? You do not wish to refute our military involvrment in Korea? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in WW II? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Dominican Republic? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hati? You do not wish to refute our militaryinvolvement in Panama? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Cuba (bay of pigs)? You do not wsh to refute our military involvement in Spain? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hawaii? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the Phillippines? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Mexico? You do not wish to refute our military involvement with the native Americans? With the exception of Alaska every inch of the U.S. was acquired by force of arms or the threat there of. When you say that a little bit of knowledge is dangerous I will pick danger over ignorance every time. and quote: Is it your position that the native Americans asked us to take their lands? Is it your position that Mexico asked us to take half of their country? Is it your position that Spain asked us to take Florida,Alabama and Mississippi? Is it your position that England asked us to take Oregon and Washington off of their hands? These are the questions that I have asked and you have steadfastly refused to answer. Instead you call me names and lie and say you have answered my questions.

slvemike4u -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 7:17:48 PM)
I answered the questions I chose too...I never signed up to argue every American action....all I asserted was that your blanket condemnation of American actions is as assinine as a blanket approval of American actions. Again this is the internet....you do not get to dictate my involvement.....free advice,if you don't like being called an asshole....stop acting like one!

Thadius -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 7:19:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx Wrong thread but since you jumped threads here are the questions you have not answered. quote: You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the "sandbox"? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Grenada? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Viet nam? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Nicaragua? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in El Salvadore? You do not wish to refute our military involvrment in Korea? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in WW II? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Dominican Republic? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hati? You do not wish to refute our militaryinvolvement in Panama? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Cuba (bay of pigs)? You do not wsh to refute our military involvement in Spain? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hawaii? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the Phillippines? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Mexico? You do not wish to refute our military involvement with the native Americans? With the exception of Alaska every inch of the U.S. was acquired by force of arms or the threat there of. When you say that a little bit of knowledge is dangerous I will pick danger over ignorance every time. and quote: Is it your position that the native Americans asked us to take their lands? Is it your position that Mexico asked us to take half of their country? Is it your position that Spain asked us to take Florida,Alabama and Mississippi? Is it your position that England asked us to take Oregon and Washington off of their hands? These are the questions that I have asked and you have steadfastly refused to answer. Instead you call me names and lie and say you have answered my questions. Hell I can answer all of those questions (including your additions to the list) with one word, NOPE. Your list of conquests and military involvement is rather short, you are missing quite a few other places we have had boots or bombs on the ground. I am not sure where you are going with those questions, or what point you are trying to make though. My simple mind quickly jumps to the assumption that perhaps we should annex Venezuela before they become a bigger threat to the region, oh and just think of how much oil we will be getting in the process (all without drilling on our prestine lands that were gotten by hostile means).

slvemike4u -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 7:26:05 PM)
Sorry for the cross polinization of threads Thadius.....but whatever else came of it your annexing of Venezuela seems like a capitol idea.....plus it was good for a laugh. Just for shit and grins I'm wondering why I would "refute" that which is undeniable history.....yes thompson we were militarily involved in all of those areas.....I had thought the argument was over motives and agression...I now see you were simply looking for confirmation of events....more free advice ,all of the question it seems you are in need of answers too...can be found using "google"

DarlingSavage -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 7:46:53 PM)
quote: Give me Rossingnol or give me Head You just want me to suck your dick. Well, you're going to have to do better than that! I'm not exactly sure I agree with your take on things.

AnimusRex -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 8:05:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage You just want me to suck your dick. Well, you're going to have to do better than that! So, like, hypothetically, what would a guy have to say to make that happen? Hypothetically.

Marc2b -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/17/2010 8:19:19 PM)
quote: So, like, hypothetically, what would a guy have to say to make that happen? Hypothetically. Well, it appears chardonay won't cut it. Judging from her profile pics, I'd say that cake batter should to the trick. [:D]

DarlingSavage -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/18/2010 7:25:26 AM)
quote: So, like, hypothetically, what would a guy have to say to make that happen? Hypothetically. Hypothetically, and actually, he'd have to be single, for starters. Then some sort of relationship with me should be in place. I need a lover so I can suck his cock. [sm=cute.gif] YAY!

DarlingSavage -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/18/2010 7:28:20 AM)
quote: Well, it appears chardonay won't cut it. Judging from her profile pics, I'd say that cake batter should to the trick. Vosges, champagne, strawberries, home made whipped cream, bubble bath in a fancy bath tub. YUM![sm=cute.gif]YUM! [sm=candles.gif]YUM!

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/18/2010 7:50:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage quote: Give me Rossingnol or give me Head You just want me to suck your dick. Well, you're going to have to do better than that! I'm not exactly sure I agree with your take on things. Rossi and Head are ski manufacturers. The blow job does sound enticing though. You do not have to like the truth to acknowledge it.

thompsonx -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/18/2010 8:00:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Thadius quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx Wrong thread but since you jumped threads here are the questions you have not answered. quote: You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the "sandbox"? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Grenada? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Viet nam? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Nicaragua? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in El Salvadore? You do not wish to refute our military involvrment in Korea? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in WW II? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Dominican Republic? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hati? You do not wish to refute our militaryinvolvement in Panama? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Cuba (bay of pigs)? You do not wsh to refute our military involvement in Spain? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Hawaii? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in the Phillippines? You do not wish to refute our military involvement in Mexico? You do not wish to refute our military involvement with the native Americans? With the exception of Alaska every inch of the U.S. was acquired by force of arms or the threat there of. When you say that a little bit of knowledge is dangerous I will pick danger over ignorance every time. and quote: Is it your position that the native Americans asked us to take their lands? Is it your position that Mexico asked us to take half of their country? Is it your position that Spain asked us to take Florida,Alabama and Mississippi? Is it your position that England asked us to take Oregon and Washington off of their hands? These are the questions that I have asked and you have steadfastly refused to answer. Instead you call me names and lie and say you have answered my questions. Hell I can answer all of those questions (including your additions to the list) with one word, NOPE. The question was not simply were we there but were we there for the purpose of national agrandisement. Since your answer to the last four questions was no then you agree that we took those lands by force or threat of force. Your list of conquests and military involvement is rather short, you are missing quite a few other places we have had boots or bombs on the ground. Please show me where I suggested that the list was all inclusive. I am not sure where you are going with those questions, or what point you are trying to make though. From my first post I was clear that every war that the U.S. has been in we either started or instigated our involvement in for the purpose of national agrandisement My second point was and is that every part of the U.S. with the exception of Alaska was taken by force of ar ms or the threat there of. So far neither you nor Mike nor anyone else have been able to show where my statements are untrue. My simple mind quickly jumps to the assumption that perhaps we should annex Venezuela before they become a bigger threat to the region, oh and just think of how much oil we will be getting in the process (all without drilling on our prestine lands that were gotten by hostile means). Since this is not labled as sarcasm I will take you at your word. That word is that you are an impearlist. The more common term is thief.

Marc2b -> RE: Hugo Chavez & Venezuela (2/18/2010 8:03:43 AM)
quote: Vosges, champagne, strawberries, home made whipped cream, bubble bath in a fancy bath tub. Oh Yeah! I would greatly enjoy all that while you gave me head (just be sure you come up for air, now and then)! [:)]

Page: << < prev 8 9 10 [11] 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125