hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/23/2010 9:14:08 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha quote:
ORIGINAL: hardbodysub I'm going to go against the tide here. I expect to get flamed, but so be it. I'd rather speak the truth, tell it like it is, and catch hell for it if that's the result. The concept that when dommes spout off about not being into a sub's expressed interest, they're doing the guy a favor and educating him, that's nothing more than a rationalization allowing them to bitch and moan about not getting what they want. I'm not saying that it's intentional. A lot of women actually believe that they're helping when they do this. But they're not. What they're doing is dominating the thread with unnecessary negatives, and discouraging positive responses from people who actually might consider responding affirmatively. What they don't seem to get is that silence is a very good negative response. If a guy asks how many femdoms are into X, Y, or Z, and nobody responds, that answers his question just fine, without the self-centered, self-righteous explanations of why someone doesn't like it. If someone asks "How do people feel about X?", then it's appropriate for anyone to respond about whether, how, and why they like or dislike it. If the questions is "Who likes X, and why?", then there's really no good reason for hordes of dislikers to chime in and disparage X. If you think you're providing an educational service, you're just being self-delusioinal. I think femdoms could do a better job (myself included) of not bringing past baggage into a thread when a new sub posts what appears to be a selfish question, a request for wanking material, or a gleeful disregard for reality. I think subs still do underestimate just how much, how often and how intensely femdoms are objectified - daily - by men who think this is ok. As a result, we may come off as heavy handed when a man comes strongly from a position of fantasy-land (his own). Or, we're just impatient, fed up, and it was the 10th message like it we've read that day (remember, a lot of us are reading a dozen emails a day that are much more objectifying and rude). I do think women should respond and tell subs "No, that's not what I am into," but I think we could make a better attempt to show an alternate POV of when we *may* be into that kind of scenario and how it works, so the sub gets an idea of the reality vs. the fantasy. I think a lot of us are discouraged at the idea of taking that much time and effort, because many of us have done that one-on-one with a guy, only to have him still turn around and use us as a sex object, or just give a virtual blank stare and contact us again a week later with the same come-on. Akasha Thank you so much for understanding what I wrote and responding so eloquently. I don't object to retorts against foolish remarks, nor to voicing disagreement about just about anything. I also agree with you that giving alternatives and clarifying reality vs. fantasy can be productive, as long as we remember that realities as well as fantasies aren't the same for everyone. However, I think it's unnecessary, and often counterproductive, to reply negatively just because the OP is into something that you're not. You obviously get it, but evidently not everybody did. Responding negatively just because your kink isn't their kink either clutters up a serious thread needlessly, or feeds a troll who was just trying to stir things up. No responses sends a pretty clear picture, IMO.
|
|
|
|