RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


Lockit -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:30:52 PM)

Basically... if you are bad, we are supposed to be good so that we look like finer people. Someone placing standards on how I am to conduct myself in response to how someone is acting badly. We have been nice, we have been snarky, we have been informative, we have done nothing. Now we are told... behave yourself with these bad posters and just show them disapproval for their words or actions by not responding to them.

All well and fine and I could agree... until the fucking point you are telling me what to do, how to do it and how I might look best to people. I think I will take my lumps of being judged unfair, snarky or less a decent human being who might need a few lessons myself. lol I think I am old enough to say and do what I wish and if I lose a submissive because of it... cool... he wouldn't have lasted long with my naughty mouth.

Call it attitude if you want. Call it anger... childish or anything else... I will take what you've got. I am still not going to temper my posting style or what I wish to say unless a mod requires it of me or my own standards are a factor. You don't like my standards... lol... you know what you can do with that. lol Just as I will judge and answer a troll, someone who hasn't a clue how to act with adult's or some wanker on a stroll... you can judge me the same. I will live with that... it's not like those who are complaining are going to mean anything to my in person life. Make my life hell here... because of it... but I am still going to say what the fuck I want to say, to whomever I wish to say it to.

No... I am not always nice and yes I do enjoy being snarky sometimes and sarcastic. Yes I think I can go overboard sometimes. Do I feel the perfect dominant? Oh hell no! Not going to happen. Best person awards... I doubt it... but the day I obey a social standard set by someone who hasn't walked a mile in my cyber shoes.. real life or online... and I am in line with the site... and a man is telling me how I can best to look to him... somebody can kiss my ass. lol

Sometimes my greatest lessons in life were taught by rude, snarky people and situations. lol Hell, I might even get one today in response to this post... but then again... I do what I do, it is what it is... eat me or get over it.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:35:10 PM)

Hey! I wasn't telling you what to do!

Just pointing out that there were some people on the thread who were complaining about the snarks, is all.




Lockit -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:38:12 PM)

LOL Not you darlin... I am sorry, I just post... rarely do that fast reply thing. I really am sorry, I didn't mean to say that to you!




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:45:27 PM)

No worries [:)]

I get what you're saying-how you post is your business.

I am starting to wonder how effective slamming people is as a style, though-the thing with pyschonaut, for example, would have finished a whole lot quicker if everyone (myself included) had stopped rising to the bait. And then we could have gone back to talking about gentlemen [sm=hearts.gif]

If your aim is to make the wankers realise that their behaviour is entirely unwelcome, snarking could be the way to go. But if your aim is to make them go away and stop posting, then I wonder if it's really the best option on the table.

edited because I realised I had used the word 'though' twice in two paragraphs, which made the stifled eng lang student in me start to cry.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:45:39 PM)

quote:

I think hardbodysub could have been more diplomatic, but he does have a point.


You're clearly right about the diplomacy. Sometimes (OK, a lot of times) I just decide to lay it out there unmitigated and unvarnished, and let the chips fall where they may. Sometimes the point gets across better when it smacks people on the nose. Other times they miss the point entirely because it gets their hackles up. No skin off my nose either way. Although it does make it easier to see who can intelligently discern the logic in a blunt or apparently rude post, and who doesn't have the ability to think straight when the chip on their shoulder gets nudged a bit.




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 2:45:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

quote:

Again...both ironic and hilarious.  Take a few more days to figure out exactly why.  Take a couple of weeks...you'll need them.


Gee, honey, your inability to see your own shortcomings and project them onto others has no bounds, does it? How ironic and hilarious your snipes are. Think about it. You won't only need time, you'll need some help. Maybe professional.


Your case of sour grapes because I ignored your attempt to insinuate yourself into my good graces some months ago in the hope I might be interested in having you as my sub finally rears its ugly, mishapen head.  I wondered how long it would take. 
 
Carry on...




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 3:06:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

I get what you're saying but in this case it's not strictly true-there are a few people on that thread objecting to the flamers. I would say there are more posters complaining there than on some of the male-generated wanker threads I've read.



I went back over that thread and found 2 people who had complained since last I'd looked at it.  However -- and I think this is very telling -- both of those people were soundly told off for having the audacity to presume to tell the regular posters they should STFU if they didn't have something nice to say. 
 
Neither of them were people who regularly bitch and moan about the exact same thing in this forum.  So why is it that we even entertain the idea, however hypothetically, that anyone has the right to tell us how to post or not post as we see fit as long as we don't violate the forum guidelines?  See my thoughts about the existence of a double standard.




Lockit -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 3:10:21 PM)

I notice they tell us domina's far more than dominant men.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 3:15:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

I get what you're saying but in this case it's not strictly true-there are a few people on that thread objecting to the flamers. I would say there are more posters complaining there than on some of the male-generated wanker threads I've read.



I went back over that thread and found 2 people who had complained since last I'd looked at it.  However -- and I think this is very telling -- both of those people were soundly told off for having the audacity to presume to tell the regular posters they should STFU if they didn't have something nice to say. 
 
Neither of them were people who regularly bitch and moan about the exact same thing in this forum.  So why is it that we even entertain the idea, however hypothetically, that anyone has the right to tell us how to post or not post as we see fit as long as we don't violate the forum guidelines?  See my thoughts about the existence of a double standard.


Fair do's-if I'm honest I flicked through the thread fairly quickly when I read it; I registered that people were objecting-didn't register much more than that.

But I would also point out that there are some threads started by males where nobody complains at all...

(Cloudboy only seems bothered if there's feminization involved, for example :-P)




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 3:34:33 PM)

For those who think there's a double standard, I suggest that they're right, there is. Men are lambasted from head to toe whenever they chime in the way women do habitually.

Just imagine the OP being redirected a bit to discuss femdoms posting about something they want, and men responding that they don't like that, would never want to do that, and why. The response to the men in such cases would be overwhelmingly negative, bitter, and belittling. In such situations, the men are customarily denigrated as being "not real subs", and told to voice their opinions elsewhere.

Getting back to this thread's OP, however, I don't give a damn who writes the OP. If they're asking for opinions about a particular fetish, or whether people are into it or not, and why, then everyone should feel free to chime right in. If the OP is asking specifically just to hear from people who SHARE that fetish, then someone who just can't stop themselves from raining on the parade has a bit of a problem.




Lockit -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 3:47:47 PM)

God... it is a wonder any femdom can find a male submissive... we are so abusive here... so unfair.

I don't think that we all are insensitive to what submissive men want and many of us wish to know how they feel. How one presents things is often how things get treated on the boards.




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:13:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

Just imagine the OP being redirected a bit to discuss femdoms posting about something they want, and men responding that they don't like that, would never want to do that, and why. The response to the men in such cases would be overwhelmingly negative, bitter, and belittling. In such situations, the men are customarily denigrated as being "not real subs", and told to voice their opinions elsewhere.


I won't deny this is the case.  However, let's put it in perspective:
 
What do you think would happen if a sub, male or female, posted in the submissives forum and a dominant (male or female) told that sub s/he was wrong for posting that way?  Do you think the rest of the subs would stand back and do nothing?  Or do you think the Dumbinant would be run out of the forum on a rail?  Similarly, what do you think would happen if a dominant woman posted in the Master's forum, received replies along the lines of "nope, not into that and can't imagine ever becoming interested in it," then proceeded to pitch the sort of hissy fit many of the submissive men here throw when their own fetishes are dismissed?  Do you think the dominant men would sit silently by while the dominant woman bitched and moaned or do you think they'd tell her to put on her big girl panties and cope? 
 
It's all a matter of where you are, not who you are.  Granted, anyone can post anywhere on the forums, regardless of sex, gender, or D/s orientation.  However, one should expect, when posting to a forum dedicated to a particular group, for those who identify as belonging to that group to speak freely, regardless what their opinions happen to be.

For those who think there's a double standard, I suggest that they're right, there is. Men are lambasted from head to toe whenever they chime in the way women do habitually.


I disagree.  I have seen men respond in exactly the same way you claim the dominant women do and, not only were they not lambasted by women, in many cases their posts were supported. 
 
As I see it, trolls looking for wank fodder are treated the same, regardless of whether they're male or female.  However, there are far more complaints about that treatment to be found on the Mistress board than in other sections of the forum.  I don't think I've ever seen anyone on the Masters, Gorean, or Submissive boards suggest that they should consider softening their posting styles or simply refrain from posting so as not to offend anyone and have the suggestion be taken seriously.  This is where I see the double standard come into play.

quote:

Getting back to this thread's OP, however, I don't give a damn who writes the OP. If they're asking for opinions about a particular fetish, or whether people are into it or not, and why, then everyone should feel free to chime right in. If the OP is asking specifically just to hear from people who SHARE that fetish, then someone who just can't stop themselves from raining on the parade has a bit of a problem.


This wasn't the topic of the OP.  The OP was about complaints of (predominantlly) sub men when the dominant women express their distaste for a particular fetish and those same individuals then telling us, the dominant women for whom this board was created, to shut the fuck up if we don't have anything positive to say.  The OP went on to express the view that those who voice a negative opinion (in the sense of saying they aren't into X, Y, or Z fetish, not negative = snarky) are actually giving the poster valuable information from which he can benefit if he takes the time to read and analyze the responses.
 
I happen to agree with Aakasha that there is something to be learned, even from the snark.  I also agree with you that we could do things a bit differently and try to help new posters more.  Hence the reason I suggested the FAQ, which will include links to threads about common topics and suggestions for how to write a post that won't get a body lambasted for appearing to be a troll.
 
What I don't agree with is that anyone other than the mods has the right to tell the dominant women on this board how they should post, and I posit that anyone who thinks he has that right will, and should be, verbally shredded for his unmitigated gall and overweening arrogance.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:22:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

God... it is a wonder any femdom can find a male submissive... we are so abusive here... so unfair.

I don't think that we all are insensitive to what submissive men want and many of us wish to know how they feel. How one presents things is often how things get treated on the boards.


I don't believe that I said either of those things. But I definitely believe that if there is any double standard in regard to negative responses and flames, dommes are much more on the giving than on the receiving end of it. There are probably more males asking stupid questions in the OP, but that's not the topic here.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:32:21 PM)

quote:

our case of sour grapes because I ignored your attempt to insinuate yourself into my good graces some months ago in the hope I might be interested in having you as my sub finally rears its ugly, mishapen head.  I wondered how long it would take. 


Ummm... delusions of grandeur on your part. I never, ever, attempted to be your sub. Now you're really making me think you need professional help. Projection again.

I had an brief interest in your profile, and there was NEVER any attempt to be your sub. Even if I had been interested, the distance was prohibitive. And anyway, the more I saw, the less I liked. You never rejected me. I decided I wasn't interested in you. And, by the way, you really should avoid any future TV interviews. All you did was make the lifestyle look ridiculous.




Lockit -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:41:25 PM)

LOL... Oh... that explains watching you trying to impress her on the boards. You forget some of us were around and saw all that buttering up/flirting. I remember watching it and laughing about it, thinking she was sooooo the type you went for.... younger than you and pretty. So I guess I projected too or I am just silly revengeful becasue it wasn't me you were after! lol

I was positive at the time you had contacted her... but can't prove that or how I came to conclude that.

Delusions... I think not.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:41:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

quote:

Getting back to this thread's OP, however, I don't give a damn who writes the OP. If they're asking for opinions about a particular fetish, or whether people are into it or not, and why, then everyone should feel free to chime right in. If the OP is asking specifically just to hear from people who SHARE that fetish, then someone who just can't stop themselves from raining on the parade has a bit of a problem.


This wasn't the topic of the OP.  The OP was about complaints of (predominantlly) sub men when the dominant women express their distaste for a particular fetish and those same individuals then telling us, the dominant women for whom this board was created, to shut the fuck up if we don't have anything positive to say.  The OP went on to express the view that those who voice a negative opinion (in the sense of saying they aren't into X, Y, or Z fetish, not negative = snarky) are actually giving the poster valuable information from which he can benefit if he takes the time to read and analyze the responses.
 
I happen to agree with Aakasha that there is something to be learned, even from the snark.  I also agree with you that we could do things a bit differently and try to help new posters more.  Hence the reason I suggested the FAQ, which will include links to threads about common topics and suggestions for how to write a post that won't get a body lambasted for appearing to be a troll.
 
What I don't agree with is that anyone other than the mods has the right to tell the dominant women on this board how they should post, and I posit that anyone who thinks he has that right will, and should be, verbally shredded for his unmitigated gall and overweening arrogance.


Not precisely true. The topic of the OP was ambiguous. It did not make distinctions between OPs that simply ask or talk about a fetish and those that specifically ask for responses from those who SHARE the fetish. My response clearly made the distinction, and stated that sniping negatively when the OP was asking for responses from people with shared interests was counterproductive. I didn't say that there was anything wrong with replying negatively to anything else.

Some people found it easy to comprehend what I wrote. Others, obviously not.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:45:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

LOL... Oh... that explains watching you trying to impress her on the boards. You forget some of us were around and saw all that buttering up/flirting. I remember watching it and laughing about it, thinking she was sooooo the type you went for.... younger than you and pretty. So I guess I projected too or I am just silly revengeful becasue it wasn't me you were after! lol

I was positive at the time you had contacted her... but can't prove that or how I came to conclude that.

Delusions... I think not.


I think your memory is quite twisted. I have paid compliments to many people on here, but that certainly does not equate to asking to be their sub.

Even if you misinterpret simple compliments as attempts to be accepted as a sub, the simple fact of geographic distance precludes me from having any such interest in anybody here. You're flat wrong. Period.




MsHValentine -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:45:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan


Over on the Masters forum is a thread in which the OP came to the forum, ostensibly under the direction of "her" dominant, to inform the general public of her loyalty to her "master" and the details of their sex life plus a request for ideas for her master to try out on her.  The thread in question has reached five pages of people, dominant and submissive, male and female, essentially pissing all over her, her master, and the thread.  From my quick skim, there is absolutely no one taking exception to the caustic responses generated by the OP.  Not one single voice of dissent or anyone lamenting the cruel dominants who have to rain all over the poor sub's parade and why can't they all just STFU instead.
 
Because, you see, in the back of many minds, it's okay for a woman to get chastised for "bad" behavior, and it's okay for a woman to be told to sit down and shut the fuck up if she doesn't have something pleasant to say, but it's not okay for a woman to tell an equally ill-mannered and uncouth man the exact same thing.  I certainly don't see any of the people who are bitching about women's behavior in this forum running over there to stick up for her and her master or chastise the forum regulars for bad behavior -- Kevin, Hardbody, Cloudboy -- yes, I'm calling all of you on your bullshit double standard. 
 
I'm not suggesting that responses can't or shouldn't be diplomatic whenever possible.  However, that doesn't mean any of us should feel obligated to be diplomatic or remain silent because OH. MY. GAWD. someone's delicate sensibilities might be offended.  Ever hear the saying "if you're bored, then you're boring?"  If you're offended, perhaps it's because you were offensive.



Exactly my point. I imagine hardbodysub wouldn't dream of telling another male poster that he's being too rude to the OP, yet he won't hesitate to try and reprimand the women for expressing her feelings in a less than polite way. It makes you wonder if he harbors some disrespect for woman in general.



quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

So why is it that we even entertain the idea, however hypothetically, that anyone has the right to tell us how to post or not post as we see fit as long as we don't violate the forum guidelines? See my thoughts about the existence of a double standard.


Good question.




LadyPact -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:52:36 PM)

Let's also keep something else in mind.  This section of the boards gets a heck of a lot more trollish, wanker type posts than any other.  When it does happen in the general, Master, or sub section, it's shot down and it's shot down quick.  The other boards don't put up with it and neither should we.




hardbodysub -> RE: Lame posts: "No, I'm not into that. Sorry" Why bother? (1/24/2010 4:57:02 PM)

quote:

Exactly my point. I imagine hardbodysub wouldn't dream of telling another male poster that he's being too rude to the OP, yet he won't hesitate to try and reprimand the women for expressing her feelings in a less than polite way. It makes you wonder if he harbors some disrespect for woman in general.


That's not true at all. You've missed the point entirely. I don't care if a woman expresses her feelings in a polite way or a rude way. Often I love the rudeness. My only issue is with OPs that ask specifically to hear from people who SHARE THEIR FETISH, and people who don't simply can't resist jumping in and disparaging them. I've stated this more than once on this thread, and several people have clearly understood it, yet still there are some who don't get it.

I don't respond to threads on "Ask A Master" because I never read anything there. It doesn't interest me in the least. I don't respond very often to idiot males in ohter forums because 100 dommes have already beat me to it, so why bother?

You would do better to read what I wrote and try to understand what I said instead of using your imagination.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875