pompeii
Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007 From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EbonyWood The natural tendency is to continue to (attempt to) promote ones own genomes into the population, using those most close to optimum age of procreation. I'm with EbonyWood ... the natural tendency of our instinctive sexual urges is to desire that which will provide the best chance of offspring surviving to reproductive age themselves. We've lost sight of that goal - but our genes haven't (it is instinct, after all). I'm sure of the goal itself, but, I'm not sure of what comprises that goal. There are slight variations on our instinct, and certainly proclivities exist. But, for the most part, I'd assume men will prefer something like - younger (better chance of ovulation) - attractive (better chance of offspring being successful themselves) - curvy (hips and thigh fat are good for the baby's nutrition I guess - certainly tits "appear" to be for milk ... but in reality, human tits sizes are not) - enjoy being treated like a dog (ok ... ok ... I added that one in 'cuz it's MY proclivity!) While women, I'm assuming, would prefer different characteristics - taller (better chance of meeting an alpha male better able to provide food & shelter & protection) - attractive (same as above) - strong & socially adept (strength in self and strength in numbers are good for a man's chance of providing food, shelter, & protection) - huge penis size (ok ... ok ... I threw that one in because I WISH women would choose men based primarily on cock size!) Summary ... perfectly natural to be sexually attracted to young'ish women of child-bearing age ... (notice I didn't say 18 ... as 18 is an arbitrarily large number which we speak of for legal reasons ... the true age of child-bearing, especially in this well-fed nutritionally early ovulating society ... is vastly younger I dare say.
|