Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy ...so all subsidies to industry are liberal initiatives? One of the problems i have with many right wingers is that they appear to see a qualitative difference between subsidizing an industry and helping out an individual. They're both entitlement programs. Liberals tend to want to help individuals........conservatives tend to want to help industry. I would agree with your definitions in the macro for both the conservative "right wingers" and liberals, which I guess since you added the modifier to the other side, should be appropriately labeled 'left wingers'. I distinguish myself from both of them because the only "subsidizing" I seek from the government for myself or my businesses is to NOT subsidies, and subsequently encumber me from succeeding. I'm ready for the consequences of failure and will be happy to accept them. I'm not ready for the current administration's consequences for success which is why I, and many other so inclined investors, are not expanding or investing. quote:
You're wrong. In your mind; and without any substantiation of your position to compare it too. Really MM - is that the totality of your position - "you're wrong"? quote:
You've ignored the reality and the hard evidence that the economy is rebounding, spinning it bizarrely with nothing to back it up but your friends. My friends? I represented the actual condition of the State of California, The State is a "friend"? The city of LA? The owners of mall? It's not about me, because I'm not in that condition. The "bad business climate that doesn't exist" is all around you - refusing to see it is your decision. Believing in the "all is well" and working attitude would seem to be in direct contradiction with the President's position. Where is the practical 'regular guy' thriving? quote:
To repeat--if they're not doing well, they made crappy business decisions, and should take responsibility. No matter who's in Washington. Couldn't agree more! I would like the same exact attitude applied to the crappy business decisions made by burocrates to suffer the same consequences. Why don't you? quote:
You have two claims--the economy sucks, and liberals dodge personal responsibility, asking the government to bail them out I actually had one claim. Based upon his words and actions; President Obama is not a smart man nor has he any ability to manage people, or the issues he's facing. On the tangents that have been raised... Check your facts - who raised the labels liberal or conservative? You seem to need a label before deciding whether an action or position merited your agreement. I'll attempt to make my position perfectly clear. Regardless of the label any individual, corporate entity, or limited liability partnership wears, if they requests a government bail out or intervention to protect them from the consequences of their decisions or actions; that request should be denied. Hand outs and bail outs, are the provision of charity - not government. quote:
I'm pointing out that your argument is baseless. You've made no argument against the original argument, directed to the ability and intelligence of the President. You attempted to create diversions, and I've enable you to do so by reponding directly. Should I take as a directed reply to the OP, your comment; "you'll also notice that nowhere in that did I defend Obama or his policies."? Okay - I guess that's as direct as you get. To the other factors of the discussion; without any substantive base to the contrary other than two quarters of statistics, which the source itself qualifies in the narrative; your position of "you're wrong" is noted as the best you can do in contrast to my "friends". Noting that my "friends" based on your position, must be defined as given in the examples provided; the State of CA, the City of LA, the mall across the street, the taxi drivers in Vegas, the pit bosses, the card dealers, the waiters, and my landlord, to name a few. (Damn-If they all show up, I'll need to order more food for my Superbowl party!) Tell you what I'll even agree with you. ALL of them, especially those running CA and LA, have made extremely "crappy business decisions" and should be allowed to fail without any further contribution from those of us succeeding.
|