thompsonx
Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
quote:thompsonx So it appears that your position is that Vegas was doing just fine till the president cautioned people against spending the rent money on gambling and booze. quote:
Merc No, you'll have to quote where you used to make that assumption. I said it reflected on his ignorance about the impact of his words affect markets. This from your OP quote:
It was only one year ago that the Vegas collapse started as a result of this comment:"You can't go take that trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on taxpayers' dime," Yup, and the President's words were, and are, contributory, as documented. Yet, he was too stupid, or insensitive, to not say the same thing again. What's your problem with reality? Your documentation is simply your opinion and of course Oscar Goodman's. As has been pointed out to you Vegas was in the tank more than two years ago but in the above quote of yours you say it only happened on the presidents admonishment to be fiscally responsible a year ago. All the references, the people, the mayor, the unions, the hotels are wrong, and Obama words should be on a billboard for Vegas tourism? Do you have any understanding of the subject matter? Do you understand that you are suggesting that people spend their rent and grocery money on drugs and gambling so that rich people can become richer? The president admonishes people to be fiscally responsible and you disagree with that so that rich people can become richer. So it is your position that it is a prudent fiscal policy for people to spend their rent and grocery money on drugs and gambling? Is it your position that those who cannot afford it should go to vegas and spend their rent and grocery money so that the casinos can make more money...and oh yes lets not forget your deep concern for the tiny amount of that money that will trickle down to a maid or a cook or waitress.
|