CaringandReal -> RE: If you told your slave (2/23/2010 5:42:03 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: domiguy quote:
ORIGINAL: CaringandReal quote:
ORIGINAL: osf If you told your slave... ...to undress in a restaurant would you expect her to regardless of the consequences? OSF, reading your threads can be like watching the penultimate scene to Taming of the Shrew, over and over and over again. Not that I mind, in fact, I love that particular scene, but the "high" reponses ("I will intentionally miss the point of the question even if it makes me look dumb as shit because I so desperately need to villify this guy") you get in here are quite interesting as well as amusing. Your "inner daddy" seems to be bringing out all the angry rebellious teenage-girl feelings in the fem-snark population here, lol. But what is really interesting to me is that this sort of scenario (obeying without question) has dozens, if not hundreds of mudane and totally safe counterparts in an ordinary (is there such a thing? :) ) power exchange relationship. We (submissives who are controlled in any significant way) all face these situations in which for whatever reason (horrible day at work, losing an old friend, got a traffic ticket, burned the cassarole, etc.) we are in a terrible mood and just do not want to obey the order we have just been given. In those situations it's very easy to "turn all legal" on one's dominant and find all kinds of reasons and excuses for why simply obeying him or her would be the worst thing possible and, in fact, do you irrepairable psychic damage. That's what these thread protestations remind me of: that sort of weaselly reasoning that almost all of us on occasion to get out of simply obeying. I've had a lot of experience in the slave role, but the legal-weasel mindset is still something I have to be constantly vigilant for. It starts to creep in, interestingly, when you start to feel secure around your dominant, certain he's not going to abandon you or you accidentally alienate him. First off.....osf's "inner daddy" electrocuted himself years ago...While in the tub he was pondering, "what if I drop this toaster into the bathtub? Secondly, Your post was weak. The majority of what we do usually does not include others. We usually do not have people we don't know or who are not consenting to our thang participate. Sabe? (very confused look) No. No sabe at all. My post was only about the interactions between a couple. Dom and sub, or master and slave. Not about involving anybody else. Where did you get the non-willing participants bit from what I said? (re-reads it) The first paragraph was metaspeak: discussion of my perception of message board dynamics, but I don't believe it was about doing bdsm in front of forum members or involving any of them in a scene. That's the only place where I talk about people other than a dom-sub couple, I think. I don't care if my post is weak. My posts are often weak. But I do start to get concerned when people read things in them I wasn't aware I even said.
|
|
|
|