Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:13:10 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:17:32 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:22:00 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Pretty sure its Burke's that also lists extinct noble titles - "Earl Of Somewhereorother" for instance. You could have yourself a great time with the right planning, by taking up one of these titles over in the US and putting yourself about a bit. Important to get the upper class British accent right though - put a plum in your mouth and repeat "how now, brown cow" until you enunciate like the queen.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:26:00 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Shouldnt let it bother you Julia - its 4/1 on that youre descended from the Godwinson clan too. Which would make us related. The only remaining questions then being, which of us is secretly pulling the strings in the NWO and do you want to come for the traditional family Christmas dinner this year?

E


That would be you, since you live closer to the Rothschilds  and The Square Mile than I do

I will throw Christmas next year though


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:27:11 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



so you are both in the book?



Probably


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:30:09 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Sorry Julia, that would be far too obvious dont you think? Better to have the agents of evil located far from the nexus where suspicion should fall more lightly upon them, and connection be harder to prove.

Mind you, the way some people think, the entire British population rules the world; those squalid high rise housing blocks where poverty and drug use are rampant do provide the ideal cover for world domination mind.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 9:31:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, eres da fing, guv....if we aww is Royawty, whos den lef to lick our arses?

Ali G

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 10:01:20 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"What the fuck does blue blood mean, currently"

Hard to say. My analysis indicates that it came from a myth that human blood is blue until it is exposed to oxygen, like in the air when you bleed. Further this tour of thought would indicate that their blood is not spilled in the wars they start, which can be a hot spark in a roomful of propane sometimes. It may also mean that they value their bloodline that much.

Well, I am decendent from the Urbans of Poland. I'm told that our clan was doing well in the old country, and came here for greater opportunity, and maybe saw WW2 coming. But my ancestors cavorting with royalty means nothing now. I have left alot of totally red blood on these streets in my time. Remember can't let air hit it. Or was it light ? Whatever.

This whole thing brings up other issues which, I am sure, you will appreciate me not delving into at this time. Don't embarrass the family ? You ain't seen nuthin. This old time bloodline thing is quite thick. I mean if I had a Wife who worked and made more money than me, they would never speak to me. Not that they do that much anymore, but at least they don't hate me at the moment, except for the fact that I have no kids. They are not very happy with that fact.

Fukum, I build my own life. I don't care if I am Jesus Chris's brother and the son of Stalin. It is what I do that counts now. And this family would rather see me be a suicide bomber than to marry a Ukrainian. No shit !

But this is MY life. Unlike royalty though, this family will only offer limited support and help. We are expected to succeed, and we have largely. None of us have ever been a check person, that is on welfare or even disability. When I become disabled I am expected to die well.

Maybe it's the same thing in a differnt form, but I don't get an allowance, and some mebers of the family are quite well off, spending $25,000 to save their dog and shit like that. You have to understand the mentality, which took me a lifetime to visualize. I could go ask them for a half million to start a business or something, but if I asked for a couple of grand to make ends meet they would spit on me. Not literally, but you know what I mean.

Royalty's family name may be "We got it" but my family's name is "We get it". Got it ? Just to understand these peole's view on life is a challenge. I had some Uncles or something in the Prussian army. Get thewm in the house, pour some beer in them and they still sit in a cushy sofa as if they were at attention. I suspect they slept at attention as well. Actrually I am not so well regarded because I have not done military service.

But then that doesn't change the fact thaty I would like to see the inbred aristocracy of this planet all catch a very nasty, incurable disease. You cry and dote over Princess Diana, I say fuck her, some Arab did !. She is dead so what. People cried when Kennedy died, if I was old enough to give a shit, I still wouldn't. Stupid fuck, if you don't know better than to write stupid letters like that to BenGurion, maybe the vice President would be better in the big chair. Dumkopf. But then the Kennedys were somewhat neuvoriche, as they made alot of their initial stake by moonshining. I'm not sure that Nixon belongs in this, but his initial stake came from the winnings in a high stakes poker game. I doubt his blood had much to do with that.

To finalize, I think we need some new blood, of whatever color.

T

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 10:39:36 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:03:56 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
this fits in with the eugenics that they push!


great find real one!

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:24:38 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Nearly all US Presidents are descendant from the British and French Royal Families


Who cares?

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:27:22 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Well the Slovakians do MM,they feel they are under represented and are demanding their shot at the office.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:32:44 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Tell them to make sure they come from a swing state.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:36:56 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

this fits in with the eugenics that they push!


great find real one!



Thanks...

It helps put things into perspective for those with vision who have not been blinded by error.

as usual they fell on their asses trying to come up with anything what so ever other than their wild imaginations that would indicate we won the revolutionary war LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Here we are on an adult web site arguing with a moron whether  or not we a)won the Revolutionary War..and are indeed a sovereign nation...and b) whether or not as a result of not winning that war,but rather just negotiating a cease fire ,are stil a collection of British colonies....albeit secret colonies.....does that seem strange to anyone else?




like I said:

1) we paid the kings war debts

2) NOWHERE is there any verbiage to winning a war

and no one has been able to show that we did win that war or even make a point to that effect as I said.

All you can show is a treat was made to end hostilities like any 2 countries and or people make with each other where no war is required to prompt it.

3) it has NOTHING to do with secrets, only someone who completely fails to understand the meaning of a contract laid out for all to see.

and in as much as sovereignty goes, sovereignty was lost compltely when the UNITED STATES went insolvent as denoted by 3 executive orders by FDR in 1933.

Its contract no voodoo, no mystery, no amount of stupid slurrs will change that it is CONTRACT.

I rest my case.





so after they go down in flames out come the peanut gallery name calling brigades! 

BBWWHAHAHAHA


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:40:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No, there just is no significance to this whatsoever. That's all, so we are fuckin' with you, wanna see you go off.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:46:37 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
well-the US would be- -- ?doomed is an Arab- or Chinese- or Pakistani= or any number of such- become the leader of the free world.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:47:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and why is that?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 11:50:49 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Wait a minute....I've "gone down in flames"?....bullshit,I have gone down in elevators,parks,offices and abandoned buildings....but never,I repeat never have I gone down in flames.....shit I burn just like the next guy...and I have a full head of hair to boot,that shit smells when it burns!

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 1:02:26 PM   
susie


Posts: 1699
Joined: 11/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really



The US presidents are listed in Burke's because of their position. They do NOT have peerages of any sort. Burke's has now taken to list a variety of people in public life including Sir Michael Caine and Sir Cliff Richard. Neither of them have peerages either.

I think you need to go back and understand what the listings mean before you spout more rubbish.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British ... - 3/1/2010 1:44:19 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well you all need to go to the library and get the aforementioned book and look yourself up.  If you are not in there since the purpose of the book was to trace the baronege then you cannot make claim to the throne ot any derivative thereof.

It would be interesting to see if anyone was in there but I am betting that since there is only 120,000 names in there that no one here is in the book.

toodles


Burke's Peerage has funny rules about that stuff. My direct male ancestor was transported after Culloden in 1746 and was the eldest son of a Scottish clan chief. So the chiefdom and the associated fuedal title (baron in this case) went to the second son and descends through his line. But my distant cousin is certainly listed in Burkes (under the clan chief's and the fuedal title as well).


well and the presidents we are talking about "all" have peerage listed in the book. 


The Presidents are in Burke's because they are Presidents not because they are british title holders.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/welcome.aspx
quote:

There are over 1 million names in our more than 15,000 records of the peerage and gentry of the United Kingdom, historical families of Ireland, distinguished and presidential families of the United States, and the royal families of Europe, as well as many other prominent individuals.




yes and when you look up their lineage they are part of the peerage

that means that they list the presidents and they list the peerage and you have to turn the pages and compare the  presidents name to the peerage and see if there is a nexus and if there is a nexus then that means they are part of the peerage.

simple really



The US presidents are listed in Burke's because of their position. They do NOT have peerages of any sort. Burke's has now taken to list a variety of people in public life including Sir Michael Caine and Sir Cliff Richard. Neither of them have peerages either.

I think you need to go back and understand what the listings mean before you spout more rubbish.



well you see just because there is an exception it does not abrogate the rule.  go play with dom ken or something  ;)


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Nearly all US Presidents are descendant of British & French Royal Families Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094