LuckyAlbatross
Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveladyj Its not that I won't call him what he wants to be called. It's just that in my mind, using first names, or at least me calling him by name, puts us on more of an equal footing. It could just be my own mind, but you call friends by name, co-workers, children acquaintances by first names. To me, it is more respectful to address him as sir, no matter how well you know him or don't know him. Let's put it in this perspective- you're calling him what he wants to be called. You're giving authority over that to him and obeying that authority. It's also just plain courteous in general to call someone what they prefer to be called by- as long as what they prefer does NOT assume a relationship that is not there. If you refuse his express preferences, you're disrespecting him and saying that how you feel is more important than his own feelings about his own name. To me dominance is a personal relationship orientation, not a social status. Don't presume a relationship that doesn't exist just because it doesn't give you that yummy sub fuzzy feeling.
_____________________________
Find stable partners, not a stable of partners. "Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication
|