vincentML
Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML Then Elisabella relies upon historical and scientific logic as a process to come to her conclusion "that the most logical cause was an intelligent creator." My conflict here is: what if I proceed through the same process of examining history and science and come to an opposing conclusion that matter is eternal, i.e. it always existed and always will exist, that there was no first cause outside of matter, and that the human body being made of matter will decompose after death and that the personality, not being made of matter, will cease to exist. Is my existential conclusion a belief or an opinion, or is it an opinion that has become a personal belief? I would be interested in your replies ladies. Thank you very much. Your existential opinion would be an opinion, to me, until it reaches a point where you view any new evidence in light of your opinion - in other words, if you see something that might possibly contradict your opinion, and your reaction was to make the evidence fit your opinion, rather than make your opinion fit the evidence, at that point, to me, it would become a belief. Oh, I think I understand what you mean. Simply put by me, it is an opinion if I am willing to change it but a belief if I am unwilling to change it in the face of new evidence. Opinions are flexible while beliefs are resolute. I hope I have your meaning correct. Thanks.
_____________________________
vML Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.
|