crazyml
Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterK13 I watched a CSI epispode where the moral was that because a sub can end the relationship/session at any momment he or she wants that makes them the ones in control what do you think of this? I've really enjoyed reading this thread. Excellent responses from -= Loved this - quote:
ORIGINAL: catize I am in 100% control of myself when I follow his orders, accept his authority, submit to his will. and this... quote:
ORIGINAL: Smutmonger No matter how big or bad a "master/mistress" thinks they are-the only power they really have is what the sub gives them and this.. quote:
ORIGINAL: PrimalConsonance I think any Dom who spends a lot of time worrying about whether or not he's in charge, isn't. quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy In BDSM relationships, I would argue that "authority" is more important than "control." As applied to Simply Micheal's car analogy, I would say its the driver who has authority over the car, and the car is rather brainless in the relationship (unlike a person.) Good authority figures don't obsess over controlling others, because they already know they don't control anyone. In lieu of control, the authority figure pays attention to earning respect, instilling discipline, and setting goals for those seeking leadership. To me a Dom/Domme is more like coach or teacher, and less like a boss, warden or policemen. In BDSM control definitely lies with the sub (who decides what he'll do) but the authority is with the Dom (who sets forth a disciplinary structure.) In the end there is a fruitful commingling and humility from each: The Dom needs a follower and the sub needs a leader. This rocked... quote:
ORIGINAL: Focus50 Since neither Dom/me nor sub can function in their respective role without the existence of the other, both have EQUAL power and value to the other. But the *relationship* only works if the Dominant party is controlling the submissive. Focus. As one of the respondents pointed out - there is an apparent contradiction in the above statement - but to me that is kind of the point... and why D/s relationships can be complex. Personally, we're all somewhere on a spectrum in terms of a whole set of needs and wants (power/control/authority etc etc).. so it's hard to say "the sub is in control" or "the dom is in control". I've seen controlling subs, sure! And I've seen extremely controlling doms. Neither is wrong, provided the controlling sub hooks up with a Dom who doesn't mind being topped from the bottom, and the extremely controlling dom hooks up with a sub who wants that level of surrender. Personally I liked Focus50's comment because my ideal D/s relationship (I stress - my ideal, not "the ideal") is profoundly equal in the sense that her needs are as important as mine. How that equality manifests itself in the different elements of the relationship is where the D/s comes in for me. So part of what I find so crazy about D/s is that dichotomy - I am in a relationship that is fundamentally equal, but in which that equality is expressed in an unvonventional way. On safewords (which isn't quite on topic)... I always offer a safeword and would honestly be a little reluctant to scene with someone I didn't know well without one. Early on they're important, but if things go well they sometimes become redundant. But even when I've known someone very well I've occasionally (occasionally mind you..) got it wrong and my partner's used a safeword. I'm disappointed when it happens - with myself.
|