Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:28:37 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/09/elena-kagan-emerging-as-s_n_532319.html


I was into it till I seen the word "Harvard".    Get someone who is not freaken skull and bones--Ivory tower BS bobble head.

On second thought. Dissolve the court.  It values corporations over humans.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:36:08 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		skull and bones is Yale. at least you are within the united states, which is pretty goddamn close for you.

They did not allow females until 1992.

So, except for the word FUCK, you pretty much called it all wrong.

Ron

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 4/10/2010 7:38:43 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:39:50 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I suppose the 2nd choice runner up is from   (coughs)  Yale.


I think  checker at a grocery store would do better at this point.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:42:51 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
So, except for the word FUCK, you pretty much called it all wrong.

Ron


Then it is a banner day.    lol.      Tho- my point is why the Ivory Tower trash?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:44:15 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Pastor manning should run!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 7:45:05 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		How about we put someone in there that doesnt take their meds, is factually incorrect near universally, has the attention span of a gerbil, cannot cogently argue their tinfoil theories, just elides to jingoes for all answers when pinned down, and if possible, a gay male?


You got anybody you could nominate hunkster?

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:12:09 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Remember that when you bow before the corporation.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:13:22 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Pastor manning should run!!!


For what reasons?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:15:34 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		He is able to be judge and jury, pahunk.... would that not entitle him to lead the SC?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:18:44 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

He is able to be judge and jury, pahunk.... would that not entitle him to lead the SC?


I am sorry.  That is NOT constitutional, thus NOT acceptable.

We have the rule of law.

And knucklehead Ron,  I am fully medicated- see potassium thread in off topic for details.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:21:16 AM   
WantingToServe11


Posts: 93
Joined: 1/17/2010
Status: offline 		I'm sorry if this sounds bad, and  I know this is a pit off topic but that women is ugly has hell. 

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:23:57 AM   
subfever


Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline 		Good grief... may I suggest that you have an hour to edit your post?

(in reply to WantingToServe11)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:25:54 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I would rather have an ugly person with a brain, the a bimbo head- for this slot- anyhow.

(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 8:58:24 AM   
belladevine


Posts: 437
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
The article says that the woman is "supremely" intelligent.

Intelligence is the single most important factor that seperates Humans from others animals.

I think that it is a wise choice to have someone of supreme intelligence protecting my Human Rights.

Harvard Rocks!

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:07:34 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Please apply that to your trial by Manning then Hunky....

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:10:26 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		my thoughts exactly, Lucy

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:15:19 AM   
belladevine


Posts: 437
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline

In reality, if you must know the truth of the matter, Harvard rocks and rules!! [;)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:25:15 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Hmmmm... HuffPost insists repeatedly she isn't ideological....

Others take a different view

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/05/elena_kagan_radical.asp



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:30:23 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Please apply that to your trial by Manning then Hunky....


Manning is not on the Supreme court.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:32:13 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Isnt Manning holding a trial... Columbia... to prove Obama isnt entitled to be President? Your words, i do believe.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078