RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/22/2010 10:03:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
[sm=insane.gif]

Gosh Oliver Wendell, you sure do have a way with that there lawyerly type talk.

It's pure gibberish, but I'm sure you're impressing Pahunk and some of the other sycophants who dwell on your every word.



agreed pure gibberish to the uneducated



mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 5:44:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SohCahToa

I thought this was a thread about brain surgery, you mean it's about the law?


no, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the law, quite the opposite in fact.



Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 6:56:35 AM)



correction:   what ron brings to the table has nothing to do with law.



SohCahToa -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:21:40 AM)

I've never met a lawyer that gave free advice.



mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:25:49 AM)

And don't take any from RealZero there since he is poor at reasearch, in that it never was Johns to give.

This is the contract that is valid:

  When Anu the Sublime, King of the Anunaki, and Bel, the lord of Heaven and earth, who decreed the fate of the land, assigned to Marduk, the over-ruling son of Ea, God of righteousness, dominion over earthly man, and made him great among the Igigi, they called Babylon by his illustrious name, made it great on earth, and founded an everlasting kingdom in it, whose foundations are laid so solidly as those of heaven and earth; then Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak; so that I should rule over the black-headed people like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to further the well-being of mankind.

When Marduk sent me to rule over men, to give the protection of right to the land, I did right and righteousness in . . . , and brought about the well-being of the oppressed
A chieftain, man, or one subject to quit-rent can not assign his tenure of field, house, and garden to his wife or daughter, nor can he assign it for a debt.
According to my Black's Law Dictionary "A rent paid by the tenant of a freehold, by which he goes quit or free,--that is, discharged from any other rent."

Therefore we all are under control and disposition of Hammurabi. So Real was just misguided not knowing that the contract was in violation of the contract of the ruler of the heaven and earth. 




Arpig -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:37:50 AM)

quote:

Its always WHOEVER vs LADY ELLEN

If you think that is by accident try this sometime, WHOEVER vs :lady-ellen: and watch the attorneys shit. The paper will never leave the office.

Or do this :lady-ellen: vs :who-ever: aka WHOEVER and make sure the whoever is an attorney LMAO.
Apparently we do things differently here in Canada...I just checked my divorce papers (the only legal document I happen to have handy) and guess what.....My name is typed normally...not all capitals...kinda defeats your entire argument now doesn't it



Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:48:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

Its always WHOEVER vs LADY ELLEN

If you think that is by accident try this sometime, WHOEVER vs :lady-ellen: and watch the attorneys shit. The paper will never leave the office.

Or do this :lady-ellen: vs :who-ever: aka WHOEVER and make sure the whoever is an attorney LMAO.
Apparently we do things differently here in Canada...I just checked my divorce papers (the only legal document I happen to have handy) and guess what.....My name is typed normally...not all capitals...kinda defeats your entire argument now doesn't it


not at all.

That is the proper way to even according the government printing office styles manual to file a suit.

Keeping in mind you and your xwife were in parity.



Arpig -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:54:30 AM)

But I thought it was always WHOMEVER vs WHOMEVER...[8|]



LadyEllen -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 7:57:52 AM)

tell you what, the very next claim I file I will send in without capitalising the text (which I do so its clearly legible) and see what happens. odd though is, that all the papers sent me by the court for past or current cases have the names in lower case letters except the first letter of course as usual in English.

E



Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 9:34:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

tell you what, the very next claim I file I will send in without capitalising the text (which I do so its clearly legible) and see what happens. odd though is, that all the papers sent me by the court for past or current cases have the names in lower case letters except the first letter of course as usual in English.

E


That would indicate to me a shift into common law and proper venue.

You may have sent out torts it all depends on the venue, form and forum.

One word of caution: be very careful if you want to play around and do that on a brief because it will get kicked out and they will never give you a reason and you could severely fuck up someone defense.  There are very and I do mean very fine points in law here that you need to fully understand before you run out and play with this stuff.

If its a case you are in well no biggy if you dont mind losing before you start.

So for and on the record nothing I say is to be construed as legal advice and is for educational purposes only!




mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 9:37:32 AM)

no one is actually construing it as anthing other than demented bullshit, buddy, fear not.



mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 9:43:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
One word of caution: be very careful if you want to play around and do that on a brief because it will get kicked out and they will never give you a reason and you could severely fuck up someone defense.  There are very and I do mean very fine points in law here that you need to fully understand before you run out and play with this stuff.

If its a case you are in well no biggy if you dont mind losing before you start.

So for and on the record nothing I say is to be construed as legal advice and is for educational purposes only!




This is the only decent advice that droolingboy, esq et al has given:

To wit:  He has advised you not to take his advice.

That in and of itself is pretty sound, the electroshock must have calmed him for the moment.

Ron



Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 9:52:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

no one is actually construing it as anthing other than demented bullshit, buddy, fear not.


anybody:  idjits with head uppa la assa

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
One word of caution: be very careful if you want to play around and do that on a brief because it will get kicked out and they will never give you a reason and you could severely fuck up someone defense.  There are very and I do mean very fine points in law here that you need to fully understand before you run out and play with this stuff.

If its a case you are in well no biggy if you dont mind losing before you start.

So for and on the record nothing I say is to be construed as legal advice and is for educational purposes only!




This is the only decent advice that droolingboy, esq et al has given:

To wit:  He has advised you not to take his advice.

That in and of itself is pretty sound, the electroshock must have calmed him for the moment.

Ron


I am not a scumbag fucking attorney doesnt mean that I dont kick th eshit out of them in court.

Not that you have the mental capacity to process distinctions.


[image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/hit-with-club.gif[/image]





mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:02:00 AM)

oh, do cite a case for us, give us particulars so we may view the public record.  we shall research their glorious and tutored legal argumentations, and pore over them with great interest.



Real0ne -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:06:51 AM)



am I supposed to read your mind again?

for what



mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:09:06 AM)

I am not a scumbag fucking attorney doesnt mean that I dont kick th eshit out of them in court. <<<< didnt you say that right above me?



So, you havent the attention span of a gopher.....fine.

do cite us a case wherein you kicked the shit out of an attorney in court. we should be able to find it online, and a newspaper accounting of it.




Musicmystery -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:17:26 AM)

quote:

Apparently we do things differently here in Canada


Don't you mean "here on Earth"?



SaintIntensity -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:25:46 AM)

shit like this makes me giggle - did someone listen to Team Chucklehead? NONE of his "escape clauses" have EVER succeeded in a US court. He is spouting BS - and knows its BS - its for entertainment purposes, not educational - as learning lots of untrue things scarcely counts as "education".

e.g.

"Eddie Ray Kahn has been described by the Los Angeles Times as a "veteran tax protester".[1] Kahn served time in prison for tax crimes from 1985 to 1987.[2] Kahn founded the group American Rights Litigators and ran the for-profit businesses "Guiding Light of God Ministries" and "Eddie Kahn and Associates." According to the U.S. Justice Department, all three organizations are or were illegal tax evasion operations.[3]
On October 12, 2006, Kahn was charged, with actor Wesley Snipes and Douglas P. Rosile,[4] with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371,[5] and one count of making or aiding and abetting the making of a false and fraudulent claim for payment against the United States, under 18 U.S.C. § 287 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.[6]
Kahn went to Panama after the 2006 indictment, but was arrested and returned to the United States for the trial. During much of the trial, Kahn remained in his jail cell, refusing to participate and claiming that the court had no jurisdiction.[2] News reports indicated that Kahn "has no legal training but insists on representing himself and has made several missteps and peculiar motions. For example, he sought to be immediately freed because the indictment lists his name in all capital letters, and he claimed U.S. attorneys have no jurisdiction because Florida supposedly was never ceded to the federal government".[7] These motions were denied.[8]"




mnottertail -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:32:17 AM)

Yeah, well we have RealNone rustling his papers now, looking for one single case that won the majuscule/miniscule theory of not correct, but all we can find is many cases that didnt.



Arpig -> RE: Concession Of England To The Pope. 1213 (4/23/2010 10:32:43 AM)

More on the capitalization issue...I dug into my old papers and came across an old document...an issue between myself and none other than the Crown (in the person of Queen Bessie II), and guess what...neither her name nor mine are capitalised. I would have thought that in a case involving the Crown (which is the ultimate conspirator behind all these shennanigans...oh wait that's the Pope isn't it...so sorry) would be certain to employ the ALL CAPS ruse, but apparently not. In fact the only legal document I can find in my admittedly patchy files that lists my name in caps is a subpoena to appear as a witness...go figure.



Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875