LadyNTrainer
Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ChampagneMojito I watched 'Paranormal Activity' with my slave a fortnight ago, and was scared witless. Since then, I've been interpreting all kinds of run-of-the-mill household noises as evidence of household demonic possession. My boy laughs at me, but not when he's bent over our bed with my fingers buried deep in his pert little bottom... At the risk of expressing what may be an unpopular opinion, I don't believe that sexual control or sexual attractiveness is or should be a substitute for dominance, or the basis of dominance. And yes, I do absolutely believe a dominant should hold herself to a high standard of self discipline, self control, strength, courage, competence and leadership. That means coping with scary shit sometimes, even if it is scary shit. The popular stereotype is that when a man is dominant, it's because he has strength and courage, is a natural leader, is competent at taking control, and can protect those who give him their obedience and loyalty. He may be a guide or a teacher to his submissives, and someone worthy of respect in the real world. The converse stereotype about dominant women, which seems to be based in bad porn and male fantasy, is that she dresses like a hooker and teases men sexually. Her sexiness is the only power she has. What's wrong with this picture? A lot. A fuck of a lot, actually. Femdom stereotypes are actually remarkably insulting and demeaning to women if you stop to think about them. And to a great extent, they are No Fun for women, which is one of the reasons there tends to be an imbalance between the number of submissive men and the number of dominant women actively involved in the scene. This link, and the links in that article, are a good starting point for understanding why a lot of us are not really thrilled with the stereotypes of how we are "supposed" to be as femdoms. Cause a lot of it isn't actually sexy to us, or dominant either. I do respect that individuals can have all different kinds of relationships, including a sexual-only bedroom dominance play if that's what works for them. And no, I am absolutely not saying to the person I'm replying to that this is their situation; I'm just commenting on the issue of kinky sexual play being the same as dominance. It's fun as hell, but it's not the same. Dominance in the real world does mean self-control and self-discipline and generally having your shit together enough that someone else might think it's a good idea to turn over the driver's seat to you. I don't mean some silly thing like in order to be REAL and TWUE, dominance has to be 24/7 and involve your whole life. It doesn't. But for me personally, to meet my criteria of actually being dominant, there does need to be a standard of strength, ethics, leadership and general shit-together life competence to which the dominant holds him or herself. Otherwise it's not dominance to me, it's just kinky bedroom play. It can't all be about looking sexy in a latex dress or giving good anal. My standards may not be your standards, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with kinky bedroom play in a relationship that has a solid vanilla foundation. It doesn't make you better than or worse than anyone else if you handle your relationships this way. YMMV. ChampagneMojito also made an excellent point about human weaknesses. We all have them. Dominants too, both male and female. Submissives who can't cope with their dominants being human are also probably living in a bad porno stereotype, and that doesn't tend to work so well in actual human relationships.
< Message edited by LadyNTrainer -- 4/30/2010 12:51:44 PM >
_____________________________
Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.
|