RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 8:51:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Yes, walked it with bag. Didn't break a sweat. Simply not a sport. If you can do it and smoke cigs at the same time. Sorry. Not a sport.


Um, you can't golf and smoke at the same time. Good luck doing a one handed golf swing.

If you mean you can walk from hole to hole while smoking, well sure. Just like football players can smoke while they're walking onto the field. But that's not exactly playing.


Have never seen  a football player smoke before they hit the field. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen. But, I am positive no one has ever kept one lit on the field during play




slvemike4u -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 8:53:30 AM)

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 8:57:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

If you want to go ahead but nobody I know of considers "tiger" an athlete. He was the kid we stuck in lockers.

And, no, he is so popular cause he is part black. Stop. you are starting to slide into the absurd


How.. belittling. Tiger was so popular, in the beginning, because he was biracial and good. He is now popular because he is just that damn good. Golf has leaped into the arena of a major sport because of Tiger. People want to watch him, not because he is part black, but because he plays the game well. He was the underdog... the black kid on the course. No longer. He is the one to beat... and his skin color doesnt have a thing to do with his ability or why millions of people love to watch him.


Wasn't belittling him. Just simply pointing out Golfers aren't athletes. Simple enough.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 8:59:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.


Obviously I disagree. And she was doing her best to "stick" it to this "boy". 




heartcream -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 9:10:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.


How set in bs concrete this line of thought is, how unloving and exclusive. Why not rail against the machine? Why not wish things were different? Sometimes when people succeed it has nothing, zero, zilch to do with overcoming unfairness. They are often the root of it.

You folks with this conditional view on responsiveness toward unfairness and the like show how mentally-polarized you are and that is not balanced. Open your heart man.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 9:15:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Funny.  I thought her comment on it all was dead on.  What good does it do to sit and cry over it?  What good does it do to point your finger like a child and say "Look, look....life isn't fair!!"  You can either make it your life's mission to keep yourself blameless by blaming everyone else and get nowhere...or try on your own.  You're either going to lose something you never had, or get somewhere on your own merit, and be going somewhere you never would have gone without the effort.

And just for the record, some people fail many, many times at a thing before they accomplish it.  But they succeeded by not giving up.




So basically shut the fuck up and quit complaining. If you were really "talented" then you'd succeed....


Basically what I'm saying is quit crying over spilt milk  Or...looking for sympathy?  Or...trying to prove a point that you think is valid and I don't.  Not only is the milk souring, but you aren't able to get what I'm saying, and I'm not going to waste time going over it.  If you want to believe you're destined to fail because you're black....so be it.


Fine, you don't. And you failed to listen to me as well. Equality




thompsonx -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 9:31:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair

When in fact it is inherently unfair to some and not to all...which is the fallacy of her post.


.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.

What unfairness did bill gates overcome?
What unfairness did Ted Turner overcome?
I could make this list last to forever but you get my point.







thompsonx -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 9:37:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

You really have missed my points.  I don't know how to help you understand my views. 

I already said all human beings are born equal in value as human beings.  But human beings are not equal to each other.  If we were, what a boring, Steppford-like existance!  How beautiful is the rose and how different it is from the bird-of-paradise.  They are not equal flowers.  Yet they are both beautiful.  Things (and people) do not have to be excactly the same to be absolutely wonderful.

I worked with a young lady who was the victim of thalmidihyde.  She has no hands.  She has no feet.  She is just as valuable to the world as you are.  But she has never walked.  Hell, she can't even flip someone the bird in traffic!  But she does not spend her time whining about what she does not have.  She took what she has and made a life for herself.  She works, supports herself, pays her taxes and has a delightfully wicked sense of humor.   She did not set her sights at being a world-renown tennis player nor does she whine about how unfair it is that she never had that opportunity.  Is she equal in ability?  No.  But I submit that she is superior in spirit than most people I know.

somehow in your mind this is exactly equal to institutionalized racism and bigotry.
This ladies coping with her physical disabilities is exactly equal to overcoming racism and bigotry in ones daily life?



Who should be "dispatched" when the world cannot support its own population is a strawman arguement.


I would posit that war is a method of retroactive birth control...so "dispatching" the "undesireables" has been with us for quite some time

  It has nothing whatsoever to do with the point I was making nor the topic of this thread.  There have been studies that show over-crowding of animals lead to self-distructive behaviors that reduce the population.  In other words, they thin themselves out in some pretty awful ways.  http://www.psychlotron.org.uk/resources/environmental/A2_OCR_env_crowdinganimals.pdf
How that would play out with humans I could not answer as I have no expertise in that area.  I would not want choose to "dispatch" anyone but if I had to choose someone it would be anyone who has been proven without a doubt to have willfully abused a child.  Sorry, but there I lose my objectivity in seeing equal value.  I can't see those people needing to use the same air I breathe.  When it comes to people who enjoy harming children, I will admit to being a bigot.

Edited to add...
After working with the delightful woman I mentioned, it occurred to me that there are far too many people who have never had the sensation of walking or running.  I discovered http://www.narha.org/.   I donte.  It won't make people gain the use of their limbs, but it's something I can do, so I do.





eyesopened -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 5:08:15 PM)

Look, I am not afraid to be wrong.  But what exactly are you driving at?  




thompsonx -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/3/2010 6:05:13 PM)

My point is that there is more to the equation than you are willing to put into it.




eyesopened -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 2:52:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
My point is that there is more to the equation than you are willing to put into it.


Is there more to your point than you are willing to put into it?  I ask you questions and you provide no answers.  There is no discussion with you.




thompsonx -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 8:36:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
My point is that there is more to the equation than you are willing to put into it.


Is there more to your point than you are willing to put into it?  I ask you questions and you provide no answers.  There is no discussion with you.

I am sorry I was not more clear.
When you speak of the lady who was damaged by thalidamide, she was damaged from birth onward and she coped with that which is a good thing and I think you are absolutely correct to hold her up as a person who has triumphed over tragedy.
What people of color face is not just what they are born with but what came before. The lady in your example does not suffer from a history of subjugation of those with chemically induced physical abnormalities. People of color are seen in the light of 300 years of second class citizenship. When you fail to consider those sorts of factors it will necessarily color your conclusion.






tazzygirl -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:05:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

If you want to go ahead but nobody I know of considers "tiger" an athlete. He was the kid we stuck in lockers.

And, no, he is so popular cause he is part black. Stop. you are starting to slide into the absurd


How.. belittling. Tiger was so popular, in the beginning, because he was biracial and good. He is now popular because he is just that damn good. Golf has leaped into the arena of a major sport because of Tiger. People want to watch him, not because he is part black, but because he plays the game well. He was the underdog... the black kid on the course. No longer. He is the one to beat... and his skin color doesnt have a thing to do with his ability or why millions of people love to watch him.


Wasn't belittling him. Just simply pointing out Golfers aren't athletes. Simple enough.


yeah, you were.

its a shame people of his own color believe he is where he is today simply because of tht color.




tazzygirl -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:07:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.


Obviously I disagree. And she was doing her best to "stick" it to this "boy". 



The only one who sees a "boy" is you.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:21:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

If you want to go ahead but nobody I know of considers "tiger" an athlete. He was the kid we stuck in lockers.

And, no, he is so popular cause he is part black. Stop. you are starting to slide into the absurd


How.. belittling. Tiger was so popular, in the beginning, because he was biracial and good. He is now popular because he is just that damn good. Golf has leaped into the arena of a major sport because of Tiger. People want to watch him, not because he is part black, but because he plays the game well. He was the underdog... the black kid on the course. No longer. He is the one to beat... and his skin color doesnt have a thing to do with his ability or why millions of people love to watch him.


Wasn't belittling him. Just simply pointing out Golfers aren't athletes. Simple enough.


yeah, you were.

its a shame people of his own color believe he is where he is today simply because of tht color.


Read minds do you? Tell me what I am thinking now then.




tazzygirl -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:23:49 AM)

quote:

And, no, he is so popular cause he is part black. Stop. you are starting to slide into the absurd


your words speak for themselves.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:24:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

All well and good DYB...you have never actually participated in such behavior.But we know such behavior occurs...in one form or another millions of times a day the world over.
I think her point was life is inherently un-fair.....and tilting at windmills...is just that,tilting at windmills.Those who succeed do so despite lifes unfairness....not by railing against it and wishing it were different.


Obviously I disagree. And she was doing her best to "stick" it to this "boy". 



The only one who sees a "boy" is you.


Least you could do is putyour hood on when you say it




tazzygirl -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:25:45 AM)

rofl

you forget, im half indian. no one mentioned a "boy" here except you. Then you accuse another poster of treating you like a "boy".

The words are yours. Own up to them. The only racist here is you.




DomYngBlk -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:33:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

rofl

you forget, im half indian. no one mentioned a "boy" here except you. Then you accuse another poster of treating you like a "boy".

The words are yours. Own up to them. The only racist here is you.


Read the post I was referring to. I was commenting on someone else's words. Save me from you strange "Superiority" Complex.  And, you think a racist can't be half indian?




tazzygirl -> RE: African complicity in the slave trade.... (5/4/2010 11:34:24 AM)

A racist can even be black. Look in the mirror. But to suggest a native american would ever wear a hood....[8|]




Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875