MasterG2kTR
Posts: 6677
Joined: 8/7/2004 From: Wisconsin Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Its BPs oil, so BP are responsible. This is not the same as saying that the spill is due to any error or omission on the part of BP however - what BP are liable for is another variety of tort. Nevertheless I would expect BP to be sued for the entirety. As to who will end up with the bill though, thats a different matter. The rig owner and operator appears to be the first liable party and then Halliburton and maybe AN Other, who presumably contracted to them. I would expect BP to either counterclaim against these other parties or bring them front and square in the suit against them. As it would appear at this stage, BP ought to be able to recover from these others whatever it is judged to have to pay out. But now isnt really the time to be dealing with this stuff when the priority is to get the leak stopped and to limit the damage from what has already leaked. BP and many others are taking serious action in this regard but frankly the situation is beyond the capacity of the equipment available and despite efforts this is going to affect the area for decades. Compensation payouts to humans will be based on this lasting damage and go some way to providing for lost incomes and lost values. What no amount of compensation can do though is repair the eco system or provide for the fauna and flora. Let us also remember in discussing all this that several people died in the incident that preceded and caused the oil spill. E quote:
ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 BP is already throwing Transocean under the bus. The head of BP Group told CNN's Brian Todd in an exclusive interview Wednesday that the accident could have been prevented, and he focused blame on rig owner Transocean Ltd. They have publicly said that "Transoceans" blowout preventer which was being operated by "Transocean" failed. They are also positioning Haliburton under the bus as well with the suggestions that the well was capped improperly. From BP to TransOcean to Haliburton and every peon in between, they are ALL to blame. Why? For being complete morons, starting with the engineers that created this entire fiasco. For being so arrogant, ignorant and short sighted not to conceive the possibility of a catastrophic failure of this magnitude that they failed to put in a simple shut-off valve deep under the surface of the water. One that can easily be shut off by divers or even robotic submarines. A shut off valve is something common to the plumbing in every home. Several of them exist in most homes so that you can isolate various areas for repair and/or remodeling purposes. The concept here is no different. For discussion purposes here, lets say the total depth of their pipe is 5 miles down from the surface of the water. Place a valve at every mile of pipe!! It's a simple operation after that. I should add that I did have a V8 and I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night
|