Wheldrake
Posts: 477
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika For those who aren't familiar with Consensual/Non-Consensual (C/NC) play is, here is a definition based on my understanding of it. Before entering in this dynamic, the bottom (or submissive, slave, etc) consents to relinquishing their right to consent to the top (or dominant, mistress/master, etc) who is therefore is in a position to have total control over what happens next. The question, though, is how "total control" is going to be maintained. A mistress and slave (for example) might agree that the mistress can do anything she wants to the slave, for the rest of their natural lives, and perhaps that establishes a kind of implied consent. The mistress presumably won't feel a need to ask "can I pierce your cock" before pulling down the slave's pants and breaking out the needle and disinfectant, for example, because the slave has already given away his right to protest or even necessarily to be consulted. However, he could still pull his pants back up and walk out the door, unless the mistress took the precaution of restraining him beforehand. And unless her precautions were truly on a heroic scale, he would have the option of walking away (or calling the police for rescue, etc.) sooner or later. In the long term, consent can always be withdrawn, although the price of withdrawing consent might be the end of the relationship. I think it's this limitation on the concept of "total control" that puts C/NC pretty much in the realm of fantasy, at least as far as long-term relationships in our current social and legal framework are concerned. In the short term, however, I find the concept pretty hot. I've never quite had it happen, but I like the idea of being strapped down by a woman (someone I really, really trusted, obviously) and knowing that I wouldn't be getting up until she was through with me, no matter how much I might scream and struggle and beg her to stop. The straps and buckles would give her total control for those few hours. Perhaps the arrangement could even be extended for days or even a couple of weeks, given judicious use of chains, cages and/or muscular assistants. But the option to withdraw consent by walking away would still arise eventually. The only way to get around that reality, I suppose, would be to bring in voluntary, legally binding slave contracts. I might consider voting for a party that wanted to establish such contracts (if I was satisfied that adequate safeguards were going to be in place to protect people from being coerced into them, etc.), and once they were established I might consider signing one for the right person or even the right slave-trading corporation. If you want a real C/NC dynamic, maybe you should be lobbying the government!
|