Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Potentially dangerous activities


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Potentially dangerous activities Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 2:24:18 PM   
mummyman321


Posts: 2102
Joined: 10/31/2005
From: Dusseldorf
Status: offline
A TENS unit or a Violet wand can be perfectly safe to use on a healthy sub. It does require knowledge to use it. It also requires you to know the health of your partner. TENS units are used in the medical industry every day to repair broken bones, mend torn muscles, break up scare tissue. Most TENS units and Violet wands do not have enough amperage to interfere with the heart. But basic safety is alway to make sure the path of electricity to ground does not cross the heart.

Knowledge is power. Go read the medical literature for a TENs unit. Not the sex shop variety. Download a manual for a medical device. Read the uses and warnings a learn how to play safely with a TENs unit. They are terribly fun!


quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekal

While I am willing to do many things for a Mistress that may not be pleasurable in themselves, there are some things I would have to refuse to do.  Playing with electricity is one of those.  It just seems foolish and unnecessarily dangerous.  The risk/reward ratio appears way unbalanced.  And if things go very wrong, someone could end up dead while the other party could go to prison.  Am I the only one who feels this way?



_____________________________

Life - Its not about where you are but about the journey to get there - I prefer to choose the road less traveled

(in reply to slavekal)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 2:27:28 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii

Just to be clear, if you punctured each of your thumbs with a needle and pressed a normal 1.5VDC D cell battery into it, your heart would stop instantly (and probably be burned from the current, especially if it were a rechargeable battery rather than an alkaline). Your submissive heart beats to dc (which isn't good for pumping blood).



Just to be clear, this is utter, utter nonsense.

(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 5:25:18 PM   
TallDarkHndsmDom


Posts: 2
Joined: 6/17/2006
Status: offline
Just my two cents and I don't know if it really counts as electricity. I have used a shock collar on my slave. It has worked wonders and gets her attention very quickly. The unit I use is for a 50 lbs dog and I do not go above level 2. I have, of course, made sure that she does not have any history of heart problems in her family and after the first couple of shocks, I simply have to threaten to shock her and she gets back in line!

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 6:06:35 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marylynn
That's one of my hard limits. Electricity. I don't care how "safe" you might say that it is.. electricity is like fire. you can not control even in a controlled environment. it's too chaotic.

I might take your bald assertion more seriously if you weren't using a device that relies on the extremely precise control of electricity in order to write it.

(in reply to marylynn)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 6:19:14 PM   
Andalusite


Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009
Status: offline
Does that mean that cybersex is a hard limit for anyone who won't engage in electrical play?

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 6:33:28 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Cyber Sex = Electric Bonking.. 

_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Andalusite)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 6:44:48 PM   
pompeii


Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii
Just to be clear, if you punctured each of your thumbs with a needle and pressed a normal 1.5VDC D cell battery into it, your heart would stop instantly

Just to be clear, this is utter, utter nonsense.


Hi crazyml,
Do me a favor. Think before you post.
Better yet, take your 9v alkaline-battery ohm meter, puncture each of your thumbs with it, and tell us what happens.
Lem'me guess. You'll win a Darwin award. Just like this guy in the US Navy did.
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html
Pompeii

PS: You sound like the guy who wrote to me in my CM email saying that no way could a rechargeable battery be more dangerous than an alkaline battery because, he said, the voltage is even lower in a rechargeable battery. Of course, I reminded him of the "internal resistance" of a battery, which is what limits the current sourcing ability of the battery - which I'm sure he never even heard of. Point is, if you're gonna be stupid, don't try it with me please.


(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/10/2010 8:15:02 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekal
It just seems foolish and unnecessarily dangerous.  The risk/reward ratio appears way unbalanced.  And if things go very wrong, someone could end up dead while the other party could go to prison. 

Yet you don't feel that way about rope suspension.....

(in reply to slavekal)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 12:51:43 AM   
Honsoku


Posts: 422
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

What I'm saying is...from a guy who builds these things, he said it could happen even when the pads aren't near or crossing the chest area. I'm gonna take his word cuz he went to school for this stuff (well...not this stuff) and he's got more experience in it than most anybody else I know.


While I think it is great to trust your friend, keep in mind. I heard from a guy who used to make single tails, that it takes hours and hours of dedicated practice before you ever consider hitting human flesh. Now he has more experience than I ever will in single tails, but that doesn't mean he's right. Now this doesn't make your friend wrong, just saying, it might be something to think about.


BoiJen (and the friend) is right. Electricity is unpredictable. Generally speaking, it will take the shortest path or the path of least resistance. However, the exact path it takes in a conductive substance is not perfectly determinable.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 1:56:30 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii
Just to be clear, if you punctured each of your thumbs with a needle and pressed a normal 1.5VDC D cell battery into it, your heart would stop instantly

Just to be clear, this is utter, utter nonsense.


Hi crazyml,
Do me a favor. Think before you post.
Better yet, take your 9v alkaline-battery ohm meter, puncture each of your thumbs with it, and tell us what happens.
Lem'me guess. You'll win a Darwin award. Just like this guy in the US Navy did.
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html
Pompeii

PS: You sound like the guy who wrote to me in my CM email saying that no way could a rechargeable battery be more dangerous than an alkaline battery because, he said, the voltage is even lower in a rechargeable battery. Of course, I reminded him of the "internal resistance" of a battery, which is what limits the current sourcing ability of the battery - which I'm sure he never even heard of. Point is, if you're gonna be stupid, don't try it with me please.




AH! Now it's a nine volt battery? So you felt it necessary to up the voltage by a factor of six? And it's still nonsense.

You were good enough to let me know that you have a degree in Bio-med and that you know for a fact that the resistance from thumb to thumb through the heart is 50ohms. You also took the time to observe that I'm an idiot.

If I may, I'll deal with the physics, and then address my idiocy.

First, let's look at the question of resistance. I think you should write up the research you did that allows you to make his claim:

quote:


Assume the resistance of your blood from thumb to thumb through the heart is about 50 ohms (I know the Darwin award says it's higher but I have a degree in biomedical engineering and I know it to be around 50 ohms)


This is a startling new revelation for science, and it may well earn you some kind of prize. You see it is generally believed that the internal resistance (ie discounting the resistance of the skin) of the body is somewhere between 300 and 1000 ohms. Take this research paper from the journal nature - (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v60/n1550/pdf/060245a0.pdf) I'm assuming, given your evident erudition and your professional qualifications that you've probably got a subscription, but even if you haven't, you'll see that the resistance of blood, measured at a temperature of 60f, was found to be 550 ohms. I'm sure, since you're familiar with research techniques, that you'll also immediately note that in this experiment it seems that the electrodes were 75mm apart.

Your discovery that the resistance between thumb and thumb is in fact ten times lower than the science suggests is, well let's say "startling".

I'm just as certain that you're familiar with the fact that resistance is also a factor of length and cross-sectional area. This is wonderfully explained here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistivity).

The formula (and I only repeat this for the information of others, since I've no doubt you could do all this with your eyes closed) is;

R = p * l/a

(Where R is resistance, p is the static resistivity, l is the length and a is the cross sectional area.)

So very roughly speaking you can assume that given the same coss-sectional area if the resistance of blod over 75mm is 550 ohms the resistance of blood over a distance of 150mm will be 1100ohms. Now I have short stubby arms (and this is a bit rough, as I've had to use an old tape measure that's in inches and then clumsily convert to mm) and the distance I get is around 1600mm. Oh my... that's like 10 times farther than the 150mm that gave us 1050ohms. So now we're looking at something close to 11000ohms.

So, you can understand my excitement at your discovery - Your blood is 2000 times less resistant than regular blood!

Of course, you'll immediately want to point out that the cross-sectional area isn't constant - and you'll be absolutely right, the current will flow through the whole of the body, some will find its way to the skin, some will flow through bone, some through muscular tissue, and indeed a good proportion of the current will completely bypass the heart itself. I'm afraid I couldn't even take a stab at this one but let's see if we can agree that blood is the least resistive (I'm pretty sure that bone and muscle don't conduct electricity as well as good old blood). So I'm really looking at the worst case here - I'm assuming that you've jammed those probes into a proper full on artery/vein (my brain would explode if I had to figure out the average cross-sectional area of those teensy capillaries!)...

So now let's do V = IR.

We know V, it's 1.5. And we know R, it's (and I'm rounding it down for simplicity) 10000, so we're talking about 0.15 milliamps.

Holy crap! That would be nothing. Let's back off... let's say the total internal resistivity is just the 550 measured using a pot of blood with the probes 75mm apart - sheesh, that only cranks it up to 2.72milliamps.

But wait a second, you took the time to email me to tell me that I'm just an idiot,... and yet it seems your sums were out by like 2000 times! Or a little over 10 times if we assume that you're really really little and the distance between your thumbs is 75mm.

So now I'm pretty sure I've properly nailed that canard - and please, correct me if I'm wrong! Onto the "idiocy" thing.

I am often idiotic, and when I am it's either deliberate (I'm being a jackass on purpose), or because I've made a stupid stupid mistake. In the latter case, I'm really happy to be corrected - it helps me grow. So if someone challenges me in a forum, I'll either ignore it (you can't please everyone!) or I'll get into google and take the trouble to learn. I would never, ever, stoop to sending someone a whining email, because that's just pathetic.

[Edited to add the following disclaimer]

As usual, on re-reading my post I noticed a couple of typos. Why I can't proof my posts before I submit them I don't know - but on this occasion, I'm not going to go back and sub it, on account of my not giving a shit.

[Edited to add the following]

Oh and, rest assured, I wasn't the person who emailed you about the difference between a rechargeable battery and an alkaline battery (I certainly don't give enough of a shit to make that kind of distinction!)


< Message edited by crazyml -- 5/11/2010 2:07:05 AM >

(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 10:31:54 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
Did I say her friend was wrong?

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Honsoku)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 10:51:55 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Violet wands are the last refuge of the talentless, along with Hitachi's. Its a way of using money to substitute for talent all too often. I can't tell you the number of parties I have gone to where there are at least one violet wand in operation, they are like honey for attracticting vulnerable newbies to play.

In all those many years, I can only think of 10 or 20 submissives who died. Or is is 1 or 2? Or is it fucking ZERO! The amount of injuries of any sort are so few of all play combined that I tend to laugh when people start handwringing over safety. Hell I want MORE dangerious play just so things are at least interesting.

Last actual injury I know of was a broken finger and that was during a boot kicking takedown scene by the instructors in a class and they thought it was hot.

Yeah, electricity can kill but the actual risks during well thought out play are so minimal as to be non existant.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 12:02:39 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekal
Once again, using tools or appliances properly is not the same as hooking electricity to oneself for sexual thrills.  Yes, I know my computer uses electricity.  That is why I would never use it while in the bath.  If it electrocutes me while I am using it properly, then the manufacturer is liable.  It won't be because I was using it in an improper manner.

I'm not sure what you're getting at here, I bought an Erostek 232 and use it for it's intended purpose on my girl according to the manufactures instructions. "Sexual thrills" is the intended use of said appliance and I'm most definitely using it in the proper manner.

A properly made TENS unit is quite safe, when I was in High School I was prescribed one by my doctor to deal with muscle pain in my neck. Part of my fathers physical therapy after his knee replacement was to use one and he was just prescribed one for hip pain yesterday. These devices are constantly used medically and recreationally without indecent. If we're going to talk about "potentially dangerous activities" how about we talk about activities that are actually potentially dangerous, activities that people actually get injured doing. Shibari for instance, why are you alright with shibari and suspension. What's with the double standard?
 

(in reply to slavekal)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 12:31:41 PM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline
slavekal,
It's posts like this that just make me wanna slap my forehead. Electricity CAN BE dangerous, but like anything else you need to know about it, and understand what the Hell goes on.

Now, I myself have even done what the Little girl in this Video is doing. We're talking about thousdands of Volts too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS9ISUXBsa8

Here's something to think about too!! You can take a 12 volt battery that powers a smoke detector and stick in on your tounge and Pfffttt.. a little bitty jitter that does not kill you! This is way different compare to a 12 Volt Car Batter! Voltage and Current.

Personally, I'd rather be zapped by sticking a fork in the Wall outlet over getting Zapped by a Car Battery! DC vs. AC, DC voltage will bit and grab hold of you, different kind of shock compared to AC. None the less the Wall outlet and a Car Battery neither one it safe.

Yet, sticking your hand on a 250,000 volt Van De Graaff Generator.. That's kewl and well way safer than probally sticking a 12 volt smoke detector battery on your tounge.

TENS units ain't bad... Good lord.. Here's a link for you to read dude.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcutaneous_electrical_nerve_stimulation

Electric play does not equal plugging somebody directly into the wall outlet.

It's the dumb idiots that don't take the time to understand Electricity and get a grip upon the places to and best not to discharge electricity on the human body that get into fraking trouble and screw up.

_____________________________

Жизнь ума ебет.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0

(in reply to slavekal)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 12:45:13 PM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii
Just to be clear, if you punctured each of your thumbs with a needle and pressed a normal 1.5VDC D cell battery into it, your heart would stop instantly

Just to be clear, this is utter, utter nonsense.


Hi crazyml,
Do me a favor. Think before you post.
Better yet, take your 9v alkaline-battery ohm meter, puncture each of your thumbs with it, and tell us what happens.
Lem'me guess. You'll win a Darwin award. Just like this guy in the US Navy did.
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1999-50.html
Pompeii

PS: You sound like the guy who wrote to me in my CM email saying that no way could a rechargeable battery be more dangerous than an alkaline battery because, he said, the voltage is even lower in a rechargeable battery. Of course, I reminded him of the "internal resistance" of a battery, which is what limits the current sourcing ability of the battery - which I'm sure he never even heard of. Point is, if you're gonna be stupid, don't try it with me please.



Dude, you have a serious misunderstanding at the MilliAmp Discharge rates of a D battery. Let me explain this to you. There is volts, and current and a discharge rate of a battery. Unless you can magically drain all the Juice in that Friggen D cell in .5 second flats, you not gonna die from it. Dugh! Energizer D cell battery will discharge between 50 - 500 mA at 21 celcius depending upon how far drained or charged the Battery is.

The Current has to be around .1 to .2 AMPS to cause fibrillation in the human heart, currents much larger than .1 AMPs will stop the heart.... Grrrr... 50 to 500 mA is not even close. DUGH.

_____________________________

Жизнь ума ебет.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0

(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 12:53:28 PM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
Damn. In 12 years I've seen nails hammered through tits and testicles, people hanging from hooks, cunts and dicks and mouths sewed shut, and flesh set afire (none of the previous were mine); i've never seen anyone die or get injured.

However, when I was spanking brand new to BDSM, at my very first or maybe second play party, I let someone put a tens unit on my nipples. Yep one on each. That night I had irregular heartbeats that scared the shit out of me. I blame myself and the operator, not the implement. I've since played with a tens unit but I have a rule about it only being applied below the waist now!

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 1:18:01 PM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline
Okay, I was off by a decimal place. CrazyMl is right about this thing called resistence in the body. You can kill somebody with a D cell but you'd have to get the Discharge itself close to the heart. Like Jamming the Probes pretty damn close to the heart, with a freshy charged D-Cell.

the .1 to .2 AMP range is 100-200 mA... the internal resistence of the human body between 85 - 575 Ohms. Externally on the human body is around 1,100 Ohms when wet and in the 400,000+ Ohms when dry. The internal range is generall between 85-575 Ohms. Which will lower the Amprage.

I can see perhaps a slight chance if a personals body chemistry being very low Ohm, with a fresh D-Cell and if they by chance managed to jab themselves in just the right magic places (neuro network) for current to directly pass through the heart itself.

The ODDs are pretty damn low of everything being lined up just right order though.

Most people playing with electricity, are doing on the skin which is extremely resistive...
400,000+ ohms and 1,100 when wet.

The ODDs of a D Cell battery killling you is extremely extremely low.





_____________________________

Жизнь ума ебет.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0

(in reply to mummyman321)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 1:28:00 PM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline
That NAVY Dude, would have to had a very low internal ohms (due to body chemistry), would have to have had a heart that weak or weaker than average. The Battery would have to had been fully or damn near fully charged, and he would have had to jammed those probes inside his body to take a path of lease resistence where the current went through his heart.

Now, here's something I was not aware of that could have effected him. Timing! Like they say timing is everything.

Here's something I just read, cause I'm looking a few things up.

"A frequent question that arises is why some people are relatively unaffected by currents between 100 mA and 1 A. Research on the heart has shown that ventricular fibrillation as a result of electric shock is also a matter of timing (9). The contraction cycle of the heart proceeds through various phases, each of which occupy a different amount of time. Although it is possible to induce fibrillation during each phase, the difficulty of doing so is dramatically lower during the reset portion of the systole phase. If a lethal amount of current enters the heart during this phase, there is a very high likelihood that the heart will go into fibrillation. The odds of being shocked during this phase of the heart cycle are approximately 20%. Thus, the majority of people shocked by a lethal amount of current will live through it, but it is truly a game of Russian roulette.


Fracking go figure, this NAVY dude managed to roll in all the right ODDS to kill himself. Just like the people that drown from drinking a glass of water...






< Message edited by Whiplashsmile4 -- 5/11/2010 1:37:16 PM >


_____________________________

Жизнь ума ебет.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0

(in reply to mummyman321)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 2:34:43 PM   
Whiplashsmile4


Posts: 2305
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline
OKAY, this is sad. We went from D battery cells and the Navy Dude that managed to kill himself was with a 9 volt battery. Hanging my head down low in stupid shame, in a previous post, I had intended to use 9 volt battery on the tounge as an example. Instead I had banged out 12 volt battery, because I was comparing a 9 volt (lower Amp) battery to a 12 volt (high Amp) car battery. I trying to express the conceptual difference between the two. Seriously, Smoke Detectors (most) use 9 volt batteries.

I'm looking at the 9 volt battery discharge rates, in terms of millamps per hour (mAh)rates and such. Serious, this ain't the D cell battery example that was first tossed out. It's like comparing apples to oranges here.

If the Battery has under 6 service hours of use, it will have enough mA to do the job. If that 9 volt battery has seen more than that, the mA output is less than 100 mA, Around 10 hours and the it's only cranking out 75 mA or .075 Amps in the discharge rate.

A 9 volt battery that has seen less than one hour of use will discharge at around 200 mA (.2 AMPs). Around the hour mark about 150 mA.. then finally around the 6-7 hour mark it's 100 mA, after that the fucker is safe (won't causeheart fibrillations).

< Message edited by Whiplashsmile4 -- 5/11/2010 2:39:08 PM >


_____________________________

Жизнь ума ебет.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUzJI4Palq0

(in reply to mummyman321)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Potentially dangerous activities - 5/11/2010 3:35:45 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Grinning - so this has brought out the nerd in you too? I've been pondering this on and off all day.

This evening it occurred to me that, while I'm happy (more or less) with the analysis thus far - we actually have to convert our final volts and amps into joules - which is what actually nails the heart.

120V (or 240v here in devil-may-care Europe) at 100mA is plenty juicy at (12 joules) to cause some upset. 9v at 100mA is a puny .9 of a joule. pah!

It would seem to me that the most reliable way to kill a person with a 9v battery, or the original 1.5 v battery would be to shove it down their throat and hope they choke ;-)





(in reply to Whiplashsmile4)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Potentially dangerous activities Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094