Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/11/2010 6:36:42 PM)


Ok I put this in a new thread because it goes in a completely different direction to Elisa's original thread on democracy and as a credit to her for being the first on this board to make or elude to certain distinctions regarding the constitution that its rare frankly that people make. 

So I will repost my long post on the differences between democracy and republic for everyones review and then we can take it from there.

I have not seen a better more simple explanation than this anywhere on the net.

REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands,
one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."


SUMMARY
In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy. "Republic" is the proper description of our government, not "democracy." I invite you to join me in raising public awareness regarding that distinction. A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one. In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person. In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.

Republic. That form of government in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated. [NOTE: The word "people" may be either plural or singular. In a republic the group only has advisory powers; the sovereign individual is free to reject the majority group-think. USA/exception: if 100% of a jury convicts, then the individual loses sovereignty and is subject to group-think as in a democracy.]

Democracy. That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [NOTE: In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights. The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.]



The distinction between our Republic and a democracy is not an idle one. It has great legal significance.

The Constitution guarantees to every state a Republican form of government (Art. 4, Sec. 4).

No state may join the United States unless it is a Republic.

Our Republic is one dedicated to "liberty and justice for all."

Minority individual rights are the priority.

The people have natural rights instead of civil rights.


The people are protected by the Bill of Rights from the majority.

One vote in a jury can stop all of the majority from depriving any one of the people of his rights; this would not be so if the United States were a democracy. (see People's rights vs Citizens' rights)

In a pure democracy 51 beats 49[%].

In a democracy there is no such thing as a significant minority: there are no minority rights except civil rights (privileges) granted by a condescending majority.

Only five of the U.S. Constitution's first ten amendments apply to Citizens of the United States.

Simply stated, a democracy is a dictatorship of the majority.

Socrates was executed by a democracy: though he harmed no one, the majority found him intolerable.

SOME DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS

Government. ....the government is but an agency of the state, distinguished as it must be in accurate thought from its scheme and machinery of government. ....In a colloquial sense, the United States or its representatives, considered as the prosecutor in a criminal action; as in the phrase, "the government objects to the witness." [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 625]

Government; Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]

Democracy. That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 388-389. Note: Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, can be found in any law library and most law offices.

COMMENTS Notice that in a Democracy, the sovereignty is in the whole body of the free citizens. The sovereignty is not divided to smaller units such as individual citizens. To solve a problem, only the whole body politic is authorized to act. Also, being citizens, individuals have duties and obligations to the government. The government's only obligations to the citizens are those legislatively pre-defined for it by the whole body politic.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides in the people themselves, whether one or many. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives as he chooses to solve a problem. Further, the people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government being hired by the people, is obliged to its owner, the people. The people own the government agencies.

The government agencies own the citizens. In the United States we have a three-tiered cast system consisting of people ---> government agencies ---> and citizens.

The people did "ordain and establish this Constitution," not for themselves, but "for the United States of America."
In delegating powers to the government agencies the people gave up none of their own. (See Preamble of U.S. Constitution).

This adoption of this concept is why the U.S. has been called the "Great Experiment in self government." The People govern themselves, while their agents (government agencies) perform tasks listed in the Preamble for the benefit of the People. The experiment is to answer the question,

"Can self-governing people coexist and prevail over government agencies that have no authority over the People?" The citizens of the United States are totally subject to the laws of the United States (See 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution).

NOTE: U.S. citizenship did not exist until July 28, 1868. Actually, the United States is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law). The People enjoy their God-given natural rights in the Republic.

In a democracy, the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights). There was a great political division between two major philosophers, Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes was on the side of government. He believed that sovereignty was vested in the state.

Locke was on the side of the People. He believed that the fountain of sovereignty was the People of the state. Statists prefer Hobbes. Populists choose Locke.

In California, the Government Code sides with Locke.
Sections 11120 and 54950 both say,
"The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." The preambles of the U.S. and California Constitutions also affirm the choice of Locke by the People.

It is my hope that the U.S. will always remain a Republic, because I value individual freedom. Thomas Jefferson said that liberty and ignorance cannot coexist.* Will you help to preserve minority rights by fulfilling the promise in the Pledge of Allegiance to support the Republic? Will you help by raising public awareness of the difference between the Republic and a democracy?
* "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization,
it expects what never was and never will be."
Thomas Jefferson, 1816.






Real0ne -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/11/2010 6:37:46 PM)


First I suggest those interested in this topic go over the above post very carefully to get a good understanding of the difference between democracy and republic.  having notthing to do with republicans and democrats btw.


Its a bit long and most will actually need to study it because frankly you do not already understand it well you wont get it at a glance.  Especially if you find yourself calling this republic a democracy.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

This adoption of this concept is why the U.S. has been called the "Great Experiment in self government." The People govern themselves, while their agents (government agencies) perform tasks listed in the Preamble for the benefit of the People. The experiment is to answer the question,

"Can self-governing people coexist and prevail over government agencies that have no authority over the People?" The citizens of the United States are totally subject to the laws of the United States (See 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution).


What do you mean by 'government agencies that hove no authority over the People'?

I don't know how well the frontier mentality works these days, independent self governance. Self reliance is a bit more difficult, we are specialists, not jacks of all trades. The citizens, the non citizens, the corporations, the government, we're all intertwined and we need to come to some sort of accord.

The Constitution is supposed to guard the Republic - but it's not the answer to every problem. Take legalization of gay marriage - is it a states' rights issue, or is it a minority rights issue? I have my own opinion that it's the latter, but that could just be because I think it should be legal and I'm more inclined to agree with the side that supports me. Either way, I can see the justification for both sides. So what do we do?



There are several points to be made here.

First without a second thought I will say that gays have way more rights in a republic and would not have any marriage problems what so ever in a republic but its impossible in a democracy. After studying the above post do you see how?


Second, I defy anyone to point out where either the federal constitution OR ANY constitution of the 50 has any jurisdiction over the people.


Lets simmer on that for a while :)





pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/12/2010 7:48:56 AM)

No govt can give me more rights then my creator.  they are unalienable.




tazzygirl -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/12/2010 8:10:09 AM)

RO

Just for arguments sake, would not the US be best described as a democratic republic?




Real0ne -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/12/2010 8:30:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

RO

Just for arguments sake, would not the US be best described as a democratic republic?


that is really a difficult one to nail down to everyones satisfaction.

Its difficult to answer in black and whiter terms due to the extenuating circumstances in our history.

The reason is that this country was created as a republic and the republic as can be seen from the excellent article above stands for individual rights in law.

Democracy on the other hand stands for the desires of the group or a body of people known as a body politic at law.

So when 2 parties get into a pissing contest in law will always beat up on at law because we are a republic in the final analysis.

The problem is however and what makes it so insurmountably difficult for some to wrap their minds around is the course this country has taken and that is the feds by means of putting us into debt and defaulting on that debt put us into bankruptcy.

They did not do that however until all the states and most of the larger cities were incorporated hence under corporate law.

Now the states signed on to support the debt and this country has been officially operating in bankruptcy ever since.

Seemingly innocent at a quick glance. However;

When a corp "the united states" and all the states that pledged to support the united states debt goes into chapter 11 they no longer have control over their business matters.  That is a crucial point.  

Its no different than when you tazzy defaults into bankruptcy, it works exactly the same way with states as it would with you, and you now have to follow the rules of the lender and that took the memebers of the corporation (us citizens) outside the original constitution and into merchantile.

Soooooooooooooo now...............that being the case they changed from public "law" as the governance of the republic to public policy, the governance of the internal affairs of corporations.

and.............you are a member of that corporation as a us citizen who has not authority to dispute the debt meaning they can tax the panties off your ass and all you can do is ask them if they want your hair too.

So in essence you have a republic people like me who are running side by side with the democracy (us citizens) people like you.  Your proof is that whatever congress does literally all the states adopt when the pot is juicy enough.

It nonetheless however makes it so there is not a direct easy answer to it and the best way I can sum it up for you is that we have a republic in terms of law and a democracy in terms of policy and the 2 really do not mix.

The problem is that people tend to see both and rather than distinguish one from the other join them and that is like oil and water and they do not mix at all.

Now if you want to limit this to the general election, yeh that is democratic, and "lets live with these rules" legislation is supposed to be democratic however you all have accepted your representatives as "leaders" so they no longer feel the need to ask you your opinions on matters.

It really depends on which world you choose to live in sort of like the matrix which has to be the second best movie ever created second only to the wizard of oz when they took us off the gold standard.





Termyn8or -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/13/2010 9:16:32 PM)

Real, without even reading all that I have a multi phase answer.

Let's go back to HFC and his support for the Iraq war. It was based on the information he recieved. Well many years ago the army manual expounded the virtues of a republic over those of a democracy. (just so you know I just typoed demkocracy) It described mob rule, in that the will of the people is paramount, but this is of course only in it's true form.

In a republic the rights of the individual are paramount. And people seem to think that no republic ever had elections. I'd like to see some proof of that.

So in a democracy the populace could decide they don't like you because you have green eyes. In the true form of democracy they could vote to burn you at the stake because of your eye color.

In a republic it would be within the government's rights, in fact their duty to protect the rights of that individual against that mob.

A pure democracy is not achievable anyway, because there still would have to be some administration of the people's will. Such people will achieve power because it is human nature. But the lawful protection of an individual's rights, no matter how unpopular they may be, is the Law in a republic.

Of course, with the fuddie duddies of the past, religious types and all, we never had a true republic in the first place.

But the word "gives" is not appropriate for the title. A republic is not there to give rights, but to protect them. However even in this imperfect republic, the "leaders" did not see alternative sexual practice as a right.

So the answer is in theory that a true republic would be better for homsexuals, but there is no such thing and probably never will be. A true democracy actually does not exist either, except maybe on a desert island somewhere.

T




Dubbelganger -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:33:17 AM)

Term: "Let's go back to HFC and his support for the Iraq war. It was based on the information he recieved. Well many years ago the army manual expounded the virtues of a republic over those of a democracy. (just so you know I just typoed demkocracy) It described mob rule, in that the will of the people is paramount, but this is of course only in it's true form. "

What army manual is that? I have a couple, and my brother, who had over 400 troops under him in his 2+ tours in Nam on the front lines, has a whole shithousefull.

Do you have a title, chapter, and page number?




Dubbelganger -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:42:32 AM)

BTW, The US is a Republic because it is not a Monarchy.




SirAldwyn -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:48:57 AM)

Jeez everyone needs to go back to HS and study history.
We are what we are, regardless of the talking points.  Read our History and stop listening to those who wish they had power




Termyn8or -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:58:48 AM)

This predates Vietnam by quite a bit. A quick look through google means I am probably going to have to go back to my paper stuff. When I read of it there was a number and page, so from there I can probably find it online, but there are ALOT of manuals out there. I think it was from the early 1930s.

I'll look. I am pretty sure it is there somewhere, I wouldn't throw it out.

(that wasn't a quote really though, but I think it is good historical material)

T




NorthernGent -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:08:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

No govt can give me more rights then my creator.  they are unalienable.



Load of old arse. You get a gang together to challenge the establishment and you'll see that you have no rights whatsoever.




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:45:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

No govt can give me more rights then my creator.  they are unalienable.



Load of old arse. You get a gang together to challenge the establishment and you'll see that you have no rights whatsoever.


you miss the point.   the govt cant give me more rights then the govt.




mnottertail -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:54:27 PM)

I think democrats give them more rights, but more republicans are gay.




NorthernGent -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 1:56:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

No govt can give me more rights then my creator.  they are unalienable.



Load of old arse. You get a gang together to challenge the establishment and you'll see that you have no rights whatsoever.


you miss the point.   the govt cant give me more rights then the govt.



No you miss the point....you said "unalienable"....you tell me what 'rights' the government can't take away from you given certain circumstances....they can jail you for a crime you didn't commit....they can intern you where you don't fit the bill...they can spy on you when they feel it's necessary....in extreme circumstances they can kill you....you wouldn't be the first to be bumped off by the secret services because you've become a high profile liability.....you ain't got the rights you seem to think you have....




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 2:37:42 PM)

I said rights, not penalties.




mnottertail -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 2:44:49 PM)

the govt cant give me more rights then the govt. --- hunkie.


That is, at the very least, what we in the cogently aware world call intuitively obvious, those with advanced thinking skills would call that a tautology.

thanks for nothing.




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 2:55:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

the govt cant give me more rights then my creator --- hunkie.


That is, at the very least, what we in the cogently aware world call intuitively obvious, those with advanced thinking skills would call that a tautology.

thanks for nothing.


re-read it.




realcoolhand -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/14/2010 3:50:52 PM)

If John Rawls couldn't figure it, I can't . . . at least not as I'm starting into beer number 2.




NorthernGent -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/15/2010 4:58:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I said rights, not penalties.



Well.....having your life terminated....is a high price to pay...and a bittter pill to swallow....and moving from alive to dead suggests you don't even have the right to a life. Similarly being interned as the American-Japanese were in WW2 suggests you don't have much right to anything except being penned in like hens....given certain circumstances. Now that to me is not a penalty....it is changing the circumstances of your life...by government dictat...so the rights you assume....such as the right to a fair trial...or the right to property....or whatever other rights you put down in detail once you move from the broader picture of 'unalienable rights'....are no more than assumed.

We come together and create and manage institutions and statute.....out of convenience for all of us........not due to supposed 'rights'. Though I imagine it's comforting to believe we have 'rights'....gives us some stability I suppose in our minds and furthers the illusion that we as individuals are in control.




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy or Republic -- Which Gives Gays More Rights? (5/15/2010 6:26:05 AM)

So the govt can give me more rights then my creator?



I doubt it.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02