cadenas
Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WyldHrt quote:
No, the thread is about children born on US soil. Anchor babies are a common myth thrown out by anti-immigration zealots; they are an invention. A lie if you will. There is no such thing as "anchor babies" since there is no immigration category that would allow parents to immigrate based on having a newborn US citizen child. Yep, there's no such thing as an anchor baby, and women don't come to the US for the express purpose of having their kid born here so xhe will be a citizen, either: NONE of the articles you list is about anchor babies. Every one is about the child becoming a US citizen (and the parents getting nothing, immigration-wise). quote:
Nearly every civilized country in the world grants citizenship to children born in the country. Bullshit. quote:
Countries that Grant Automatic Birthright Citizenship Argentina, Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Spain, United States, and Venezuela. Countries that do NOT Grant Automatic Birthright Citizenship Algeria, Australia, Belgium, Columbia, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Kuwait, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and Zaire. That list came from a right-wing blog and is plain wrong. One of my cousins became an Australian citizen that way. The legal term is "ius soli" (law of the land). The only accurate ones on that list that I could spot are Switzerland and the Arab countries. Germany actually introduced ius soli recently (on that, my information was a bit dated). France also has it.
|