leadership527 -> RE: The essence of tolerance (5/22/2010 12:08:34 PM)
|
OK, once again I am going to try to give serious answers to your questions. quote:
ORIGINAL: SocratesNot You turned someone who didn't even want to be a slave into a slave. You changed the worldview and the hardwiring of a woman for 180°. How is this even possible? It is possible because of what Carol actually is. Within her is a very strong drive to be perfect for the man she loves coupled with a highly malleable personality. It's not that Carol has no boundaries. It's just her boundaries are very different than yours or mine. I ran into one of those hard limits quite abruptly just recently when I tried to get her to stop being my slave. The problem was, I still wanted a slave. She knew that. So in her mind, that translated to, "Stop trying to be as perfect as you can be for the man you love." She had no trouble saying quite assertively "No." I effectively gave her a command which actually DID run against her nature. I gave that command repeatedly, forcefully, and with all the leadership skills I could muster over a period of 5 days. It was rejected flat out. quote:
If she never consented to become a slave, then how is this different from outright manipulation and abuse? One at a time. It is not at all different than manipulation. I will point out though that the word "manipulation" typically implies some sort of covert action. There is nothing covert going on between she and I. She is full well aware of the goals and works aggressively to help implement them. But those goals were set by my desires, not hers. She'd probably really like it if I wasn't so grooving on this whole "total obedience" thing. It'd make her life a lot simpler. But that's not how it is and so she does what she must according to her own nature. We already talked about abuse in a previous comment. quote:
Also, do you consider yourself to be all-knowing and all-wise so that your worldview is always superior to Carol's? Or you think that you are WAY more intelligent than she is? I do not consider myself either all-wise or all-knowing. In fact, the danger I previously alluded to in my previous comments is the danger of the law of unintended consequence. But that is a danger that I accept and she does because I do. Carol and I are intelligent in different ways. If you mean intelligence as measured by IQ (a measurement I think is idiotic), then yes, I am more intelligent than her. What I can tell you is that I greatly value her insight, wisdom, and input and it almost always is a substantive part of what shapes my end decisions. quote:
So whatever you think is wrong in her likes, dislikes, tastes, attitudes, opinions, you can change just like that, even without her consent? yes. Good thing for her that she chose wisely when she chose a life partner, eh? If you really want to understand this, I highly encourage you to go to find Star Trek, The Next Generation, Season 5, Episode 21 - "The Perfect Mate". (as a hint, it's available in pieces on youtube last I checked) Yeah yeah, it's a fictional story, but it is also the best portrayal of Carol and I that I've ever run across. Ask yourself how much "consent" Kamala had. The show explores that specific thing in great detail.
|
|
|
|